маякните в комм свой канал, если остаетесь, ибо я должна отписаться от тех, кто больше не в моем фандоме, да
Signed valentiá

Channel
@VS7HERTXX
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
44subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002204295292 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VS7HERTXX |
| Description | I've been dodgin' death in the six-speed. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VS7HERTXX |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 44 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:19 | 44 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 8 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
830 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5188230247715192795 | 270 | 32.5% | |
| custom 5265227848712473091 | 266 | 32.0% | |
| custom 5267277183767824143 | 128 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5426853403705750254 | 86 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5436024395833295376 | 80 | 9.64% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 830reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2024 to 1 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
маякните в комм свой канал, если остаетесь, ибо я должна отписаться от тех, кто больше не в моем фандоме, да
Signed valentiá
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 542685340370575025423custom 543602439583329537621
Signed valentiá
MISS JENNIE KIM)
custom 543602439583329537621custom 542685340370575025419
Signed valentiá
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed valentiá
Video, posted without a caption
custom 542685340370575025420custom 543602439583329537617
Signed valentiá
- I’m sorry if i seem uninterested
custom 542685340370575025418custom 543602439583329537616
Signed valentiá
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed valentiá
when I'm coming down
custom 518823024771519279550custom 526522784871247309150custom 54268534037057502546
Signed valentiá
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed valentiá
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 518823024771519279529custom 526522784871247309125custom 54360243958332953765
Signed valentiá
I always want you 💋
custom 526522784871247309131custom 518823024771519279528
Signed valentiá
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed valentiá
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @VS7HERTXX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,312,693 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ljós lífsins” (@VS7HERTXX), 44 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VS7HERTXX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.