Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

VL (cover dance solo artist)

@VLcoverdance

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

82subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001936868266
TypeChannel
Username@VLcoverdance
Descriptionbe strong solo cover dancer pre debut in solo - 24.12.2023 debut in solo - 20.01.2024
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/VLcoverdance

Growth

828 Aug 2026, 10:00 — 82 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 18:17 — 82 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:009 Aug 2026, 18:17
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 81–83 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 18:1782no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:0082first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
91.3%
avg views ÷ 82 subscribers
Avg views / post
74.8
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held14 (7 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total898
Reactions total75
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
146
Videos
75
Links
70

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6m 16s
Average length
2m 05s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥2932.2%
2325.6%
1820.0%
💋910.0%
🔥910.0%
🙏22.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC23 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mommomliyueVideo

НЕРЕАЛЬНАЯ КАЗАХСКАЯ СВАГА 🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏 🃏🃏🃏 🃏🃏🃏🃏 🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏 WTFest 2026 🌟 Сокка 🌟 Зуко 🌟 Азула 🌟Народ огня Приятного просмотра! отдельное спасибо за съемку — @liizsi

2❤‍🔥2🔥21

2 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC109 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

случилась неожиданная работа с самыми крутыми косплеерами смоленщины и ребятушками из NAVY🙏🏻 в безумном восторге от конечного результата, сколько было пережито вместе и не зря, тысячи слов благодарности были сказаны, но пожалуй ещë один раз лишним не будет, поэтому хотелось бы сказать спасибо всем за работу, за поддержку, за немеренное количество сил которое было вложено, всë было не зря🫂💗 🤍 @WTFest2025 🤍 @mommomli

22❤‍🔥2

2 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC39 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mommomliyuePhoto

МЫ НАКОНЕЦ-ТО ПРОСНУЛИСЬ…🥺🥺🥺 я искренне люблю каждого человека на этой фотографии и поздравляю нас с призовым местом! народ огня и голубого мальчика в массы никогда бы не подумала, что у нас выйдет что-то настолько по-настоящему фемели френдли… я благодарна тому, что всё сложилось именно так, потому что этот проект потерпел достаточное количество изменений, чтобы в конечном итоге получился такой достойный результат

22❤‍🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 18:30 UTC60 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

немного обновлений в тик ток🤲🏻 1. мини фанкам 2. прекрасные закадровые комментарии

❤‍🔥431🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 19:33 UTC230 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

спасибо всем, кто пришëл на инпаблик🤲🏻🤍 так же спасибо команде Fenixs Home за приглашение в проект, это была безумно классная работа и очень тëплая атмосфера🫂💗

❤‍🔥3💋321

30 Jul 2026, 19:15 UTC32 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @madcdtVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥211💋1🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 19:15 UTC34 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @AERgirls1000Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥211💋1🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 19:15 UTC29 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @canphanycdtVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥211💋1🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 20:36 UTC35 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @FenixsHomePhoto

🌟 ИНПАБЛИК ⤵️ 🕷️CORTIS - TNT ; 🕷️30.07 ; 🕷️19:00 ; 🕷️массовое поле.

32🙏2❤‍🔥1💋1

15 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC105 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🫢ойëй, куда качу

1❤‍🔥1🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC91 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @fest1yPhoto

BOYS PRO

21❤‍🔥1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @VLcoverdance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 604,033 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VL (cover dance solo artist)” (@VLcoverdance), 82 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VLcoverdance.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.