Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Vita Nuova

Channel

Vita Nuova

@VITANU0VA

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

34subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003592025995
TypeChannel
Username@VITANU0VA
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/VITANU0VA

Growth

333433.510 Aug 2026, 07:00 — 33 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 01:16 — 33 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 04:21 — 34 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 07:0011 Aug 2026, 04:21
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 04:2134+1
11 Aug 2026, 01:1633no change
10 Aug 2026, 07:0033first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
76.5%
avg views ÷ 34 subscribers
Avg views / post
26.0
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total520
Reactions total55
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2850.9%
💯814.5%
😭712.7%
👏59.09%
👎35.45%
🔥35.45%
🤣11.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC19 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

باز زندگیمو دست خودم گرفتم به عجیب ترین حالت ممکن دارم خودمو بگا میدم عالی

Signed Virgil

10 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026

عا الان درست شد ولی خوابم میاد حیف

Signed Virgil

10 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC18 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

متاسفانه این انقد رو مخم بود از وقت خوابم گذشتم و نمی‌دونم چطوری بعد پونزده ساعت سگ دو هنوز انرژی داشتم در موردش حرص بخورم و برای کسی که فردا سیزده ساعت پشت هم کلاس داره و میانترمم داره و هشت ساعت وقت داره بخوابه زیادی گوه خوردم

😭3

Signed Virgil

10 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC20 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

زیادی با من موافقین احساس میکنم کالت جمع کردم باهام موافقت کنن حال نداد

😭1

Signed Virgil

10 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC22 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

خلاصه اینکه وقتی خودت اگه شرایط شبیه قرار بگیری و نتونی اون منطقی که از بقیه انتظار داری رو عمل کنی با توجه به چیز جدیدی که یاد گرفتی یا اصن هنر کنی بدترشو انجام ندی گوه میخوری تعیین تکلیف میکنی خودتو جمع کن

👍2

Signed Virgil

10 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC54 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

بله پدوفیلیا و گرومینگ بده هیچ شکی درش نیست ولی وقتی چیزیو که خودت نمیتونی در زندگی واقعی انجام بدی درست نیست با اون قانون تازه یاد گرفته بقیه رو شلاق بزنی و قضاوت کنی یا بگی وای چرا عقب نشینی کرد میخواد جمعش کنه خودت تو همچین شرایطی قرار بگیری روشنفکر میشی میگی بله بفرمایید بهم فحش بدین با کمال میل قبول میکنم؟ ضمن اینکه طرف فاصله هم گرفته حتی مجبور شده تاکسیک عمل کنه که طرف ازش فاصله بگیره (کار درستی نیست ولی اگه با

👎3🔥3👍1

Signed Virgil

10 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC45 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

حالا میگن اوکی اینکه بعدش فهمید طرف ۱۶سالشه و خودش ۱۹ چرا رابطه رو در لحظه کات نکرد نمیگم کار درستی کرد منطقی ترین کار هم اینه که سریع عقب بکشی ولی آدم کی همیشه منطقی رفتار می‌کنه؟( کسی که همیشه سعی می‌کنه منطقی رفتار کنه در واقع تراماتایزد تر از کسیه که انتخابات احساسی و یهویی هم داره بنظرم) شما خودتون بخوای با یه دوست تاکسیک قطع ارتباط کنی کلی کونت پاره میشه حالا بخوای یه رابطه رو در نوجوانی کات کنی نوزده سالگی واق

👏5

Signed Virgil

10 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC25 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

چندسالیم هست که بحث پدوفیل واقعا جا افتاده مردم دقت میکنن مثلا یادمه حتی تا موقعی ابتدایی و راهنمایی بودم افتخار بود بچه راهنمایی دبیرستانی با پسر بالای بیست سال باشه بعد حالا فکر میکنید جا افتاده اصلا جا نیفتاده همین الان کلی اندرایج رابطه احساسی و جنسی با بیست به بالا دارن

👍6

Signed Virgil

10 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC25 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

سرفه مثلا سلطنت طلبایی که بخوای باهاشون بحث کنی بهت میگن عرزشی سرفه

👍5🤣1

Signed Virgil

10 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC25 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

بعد حالا این چیز جدیدی که یاد گرفتن که مثلا خلاف نرم جامعس و میخوان متفاوت باشنو درست یاد نگرفتن درکش نکردن فکر میکنن هرکس به چالش بکشه ضدشونه

👍6

Signed Virgil

10 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC24 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

مگر نه اگه کنسل کردنتون خوب بود دستشویی زنونه و زوربای صورتی رو درست کنسل میکردین یدونه منتالی داغون تر از خودتون گیر اوردین میخواین تازه سیستم درست کنین

💯7

Signed Virgil

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @VITANU0VA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 804,382 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vita Nuova” (@VITANU0VA), 34 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VITANU0VA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.