Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VIRT KGB

Channel

VIRT KGB

@VIRT_KGB

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

553subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002590767849
TypeChannel
Username@VIRT_KGB
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/VIRT_KGB

Growth

553562557.57 August 2026 — 562 subscribers8 August 2026 — 562 subscribers8 August 2026 — 558 subscribers15 August 2026 — 553 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 552–563 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 15:03553-5
8 Aug 2026, 15:42558-4
8 Aug 2026, 03:34562no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:58562first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 27 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

361 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 546564322474592970218551.2%
custom 546560562660222109013738.0%
custom 5465124122113633301174.71%
custom 5280946677396566353102.77%
custom 546522444395973069282.22%
custom 518859114952211954041.11%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 361reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 29 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Apr 2026, 14:35 UTC≈1,500 views89 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☣️ Обоссаны ✅ Мы видимо все же дошли до стадии, когда антирейдухи растеряли достоинство и уважение к себе, ибо как тогда объяснить то, что они буквально ВЫПРАШИВАЮТ извы по шб? Цитирую: -извинись! -нет 👍 -ну и иди в пизду. ☹️ 😁 — я не вникаю че эта носатая хотела донести. 🤢 — а вот если бы еще поумоляла - я бы непременно подумала, а так иди нахуй

custom 546564322474592970254custom 546560562660222109026custom 54651241221136333017custom 52809466773965663531custom 54652244439597306921

28 Apr 2026, 23:51 UTC≈1,220 views88 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☣️ Может это я ебнулась? Я думала эра: а я чон чонгук в рж, я владею компанией Самсунг, живу в сеуле на своей пятиэтажной вилле — прошла. Нет, ошиблась.. 😁 — а за экраном деваха 12 лет, которой разрешили лишний час в интернете перед сном посидеть 🤢 — в принципе я сама виновата, что оплатила интернет, скачала телеграмм, подписалась на этот канал

custom 546560562660222109046custom 546564322474592970234custom 52809466773965663534custom 51885911495221195402custom 54651241221136333011custom 54652244439597306921

28 Apr 2026, 18:59 UTC≈1,090 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☣️ Последние новости вирта! Админы дна вирта обнищали, или как объяснить то, что после засера матухи оппонент соглашается со всем выше написанным. А что вы думаете на счет этого? 😁 — бедолага уже устала оправдываться просто и приняла неизбежное 🤢 — вот она, неизведанная мощь, которую они копили годами

custom 546560562660222109029custom 546564322474592970217custom 54651241221136333017custom 51885911495221195401custom 54652244439597306921

27 Apr 2026, 21:15 UTC943 views70 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☣️ Бойтесь, запирайте детей, прячьте дома.. бегите, не спасется никто Она же примерно понимает, как комично это выглядит со стороны? Тёлок уже обхаркали все рейдухи и поэтому ничего умнее, чем пойти выебываться на мирных — они не нашли 😁 — иди нах#й, я маму твою иб#ла 🤢 — ЧТО ОНО ПЫТАЛОСЬ ДОНЕСТИ АХХААХХА

custom 546564322474592970240custom 546560562660222109023custom 54652244439597306924custom 52809466773965663532custom 54651241221136333011

27 Apr 2026, 14:19 UTC≈1,010 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☣️ Новая рубрика: Разбор нищуганских виртушных халуп. Сегодня очередной шалашевень в чате выебывается тем, что «ЕБАЛ ЭНКАНТО», это теперь главный понт виртух? (Ес че, я ее впервые вижу). Решаю вскрывать карты, почти что прямо говорю кто я, ответ владельца этой нищеты УБ/Л НАХУЙ: но ты же не Энканто… Цель захода в кф: услышать все то же самое в лицо. Цель выполнена? Нет. Подгоны? Мут. 😁 — Я ебал Энканто 🤢 — Теперь

custom 546564322474592970240custom 546560562660222109013custom 52809466773965663533custom 51885911495221195401custom 54651241221136333011custom 54652244439597306921

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @VIRT_KGB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,270,845 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VIRT KGB” (@VIRT_KGB), 553 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VIRT_KGB.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.