Video message, posted without a caption
👍15

Channel
@VIPctrateg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
331subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001370306630 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VIPctrateg |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VIPctrateg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 331 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 336 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 335 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 335 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
81 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 81 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2022 to 14 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
👍15
💲Разбор сделки на + 715% #apt Шаг 1. Оцениваем глобальный контекст Если мы когда-нибудь напишем книгу, то в главе “Объёмный фиксинг крупного капитала” обязательно будет размещён пример APTOS с дневного таймфрейма Шаг 2. Поиск сетапа Сделка открыта при пробое и тесте объёмной аномалии. Объём, которым пытались удержать инструмент, не выдержал натиска селлера Шаг 3. Поиск точки входа Была локальная залочка покупа…
👍21
💰 Анализ ликвидности Ликвидность расположена в диапазоне 16.800$ - 17.000$, с повышенной долей вероятности btc сходит к этим отметкам Основная долгосрочная ликвидность находится от 15.000$ до 10.000$. Это наши долгосрочные цели
👍18
Часть выплат по закрытым ордерам 💵 Благодарю всех инвесторов за сотрудничество и доверие 🤝 И жду всех остальных у себя в личных сообщениях 📩 ❗️Напоминаю , я предоставляю возможность подписать официальный договор , также свои документы❗️
👍11
#TWT ракета 🚀
👍6
📌 Паника в индустрии крипты передается и на USDT Пока что падение 1,6% Это золотая ниша для арбитражников - можно купить за 0,98 а продать за 1 доллар и так крутить объемы пока Илон Маск не позвонит и не выразит почтение
👍4
#IOTX/USDT 3-5х ЛОНГ Максимально спекулятивный лонг. В твиттере IOTX постятся какие то интересные предстоящие события, которые будут на этой недели, вдруг что и отыграет. Вход по рынку без усреднения. Цели: 0.03574 - 0.03697 - 0.03804 - 0.03922 0.04044 - 0.04194$ Стоп на уровне 0.03044$
👍3
Подведем итоги дневной сессии? 🟢 AUD/USD: +445$ 🟢 AUD/USD: +390$ 🟢 AUD/USD: +890$ 🟢 AUD/USD: +1670$ Чистыми получилось заработать +3395$ Сегодня что-то я дал жару дико, после вчерашней тестовой сессии. И такие результаты тоже бывают если как следует напрячься и сменить мани-менеджмент на более высокую ставку. Но нужно понимать, что банк должен быть тоже большой для таких сделок. Так как необходимо инвестировать н…
👍2
Video message, posted without a caption
👍1
Итак, летом, после заседания ФРС, где опубликовалась статистика по инфляции в США, BTC отреагировал ростом на 7%. При этом объявили лишь о замедлении темпа инфляции. ☝️ В канале про это уже говорил, но повторюсь: Если не вдаваться в подробности геополитики, то сейчас в США проходит политический кризис: - Предыдущего президента обвинили в шпионаже; - Текущий сдаёт позиции из-за роста цен на топливо, агрессивной по…
Приветствую!✋🏻 После последней новости по поводу сотрудничества SOL с Google актив резко вырос к 40$ в моменте...🚀 Однако после того как горячие головы остыли, цена стабилизировалась, НО, не упала. 💪 В данный момент ожидаем пробой актуального сопротивлений в районе 45$, с дальнейшим ростом!
Сегодня встреча с участниками личного менторства в Сочи Разберём тему: "Жизнь из легкости. Учимся мотивировать команду" Сижу на солнышке, готовлюсь.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @VIPctrateg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,348,100 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@VIPctrateg named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Strategy MLM | Здесь про инвестиции 🚀” (@VIPctrateg), 331 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VIPctrateg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.