Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VIP 24/7

Channel

VIP 24/7

@VIP24_uzz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,887subscribers

-94 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001977569067
TypeChannel
Username@VIP24_uzz
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/VIP24_uzz

Growth

3,8873,9813,9347 August 2026 — 3,981 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,981 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,978 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,967 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,946 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,932 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,926 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,911 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,898 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,887 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 26 days, net -94. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,873–3,995 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 18:263,887-11
31 Aug 2026, 00:143,898-13
27 Aug 2026, 13:343,911-15
24 Aug 2026, 17:143,926-6
20 Aug 2026, 17:223,932-14
17 Aug 2026, 22:033,946-21
14 Aug 2026, 14:573,967-11
11 Aug 2026, 15:583,978-3
7 Aug 2026, 13:473,981no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:383,981first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 27s
Average length
8m 27s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5549.1%
👍3329.5%
🔥1614.3%
🎉65.36%
👀10.893%
👏10.893%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 October 2025 to 28 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Jan 2026, 09:48 UTC≈12,200 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

💰EXNESS orqali tez va ishonchli treyding boshlang! 💰 📈 0.0 spread | ⚡ Instant yechib olish | 24/7 ishlaydi 📌 Ro‘yxatdan o‘tish uchun: ✅ Faqat telefon yoki email kifoya ✅ 2 daqiqada tayyor hisob ✅ Minimal depozit — o‘zingiz belgilaysiz! https://one.exnesstrack.org/a/7ootrl9lys 🔥Boshlash uchun eng qulay vaqt — HOZIR! 🔥

19

8 Oct 2025, 05:50 UTC≈7,200 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Nma u ogzimdan chiqsa bozor shuyoga ketvoti a

🎉32🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @VIP24_uzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Nazirov FX🦅
@nazirov_fxf · 31,257
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 6 September 2026
𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘 𝗜𝗡𝗩𝗘𝗦𝗧
@Trade_InvestUz · 50,923
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 26 August 2026
𝑰𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒅𝒆𝒓.𝒖𝒛
@trader_uuz · 34,365
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 4 September 2026
XAUUSD | KILLER
@XAUUSD_KILLEER · 33,005
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 4 September 2026
𝗛𝗬𝗕𝗥𝗜𝗗 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘
@hybrid_scalp · 50,210
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 25 August 2026
BEK TRADER
@bektrpro · 33,541
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 4 September 2026
R.S.T | INVEST
@RST_invest · 31,652
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VIP 24/7” (@VIP24_uzz), 3,887 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VIP24_uzz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.