Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝖵𝖠𝖭𝖨𝖳𝖠𝖲 𝖦𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗍𝗍𝖾 | сетка

Channel

𝖵𝖠𝖭𝖨𝖳𝖠𝖲 𝖦𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗍𝗍𝖾 | сетка

@VGazette

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

30subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004475889805
TypeChannel
Username@VGazette
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 3 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/VGazette

Growth

2430279 August 2026 — 24 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29 subscribers9 September 2026 — 30 subscribers9 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 30 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23–31 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 00:0030+1
31 Aug 2026, 09:1629+1
25 Aug 2026, 03:2728+2
17 Aug 2026, 14:3426+2
11 Aug 2026, 10:3124no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:4524first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5276279950616304528940.9%
custom 5276316569507470415940.9%
❤418.2%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC12 viewsread 11 August 2026

#щп Йоханн слёзно ждёт Данте и Риче Роланд слёзно ждёт егерей Оливье слёзно ждёт Гано и Миру Хлоя слёзно ждёт Жан - Жака И остальные ждут гг

9 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC13 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @fandomykvPhoto

Блин, какой фд можно пошарить? Откуда этот персонаж? Пж, кто-нибудь, объясните лор игры Я новичок в этом фандоме, помогите мне!!! Знакомо ли вам это? Тогда добро пожаловать в кф по фандомам, здесь вы можете найти себе новых фд или узнать что-то но Навигация

9 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC15 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @twstnetPhoto

❌💚💚❌⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️ 🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️ 💙 ищешь сетку по твистеду с возможностью взять своего ос? 💙 хочешь вести канон персонажа? 💙 а может у тебя просто слишком много свободного времени? ❌❌💙💙❌𝓜ы ждём тебя !❌❌💚💚 ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌клик

8 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC21 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @ANNIMDDSPhoto

──── 𝘏𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘰 ! ʾ ۪ ㅤׂ ────── . ╰─ ₊ ˚ – Хочу контент по сериалу «Участок» но его сейчас так мало,особенно каких-то проектов! ⬋⬊ . . . .𝓩накомая ситуация?𓂃 ໋ ⊹ ᜔ 𝓜ы ищем участников в нашу сетку по сериалу «Участок» открылись,мы,совсем недавно и ждем именно тебя ! 𝓩аинтересовали? Тогда ждем вашу анкету у нас !❀ ׅ ⺀

8 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC17 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @kagetsksetPhoto

➖➖➖➖➖ по ➖адетству. 1 сезон! 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🔤обро пожаловать в «🔤адетское дело» •не можете найти сетку по любимому фд ? •хотите понаблюдать за жизнью любимых героев? • хотите вести тгк от лица любимого персонажа ? 🥬огда вы попали по адресу! 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🥬ут вы можете вести канал от любимого персонажа или просто наблюдать за ними и их взаимодействием с другими.

8 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC20 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

❌❌❌🙄😆🫣🫢😰😆😶🤩🤩 ❌❌🤩🤩😍😆🫠😅😰😰😅😘 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🎼📖 🙃жидаемые 😘ерсонажи😘 Не можете определиться, кого именно хотите занять? Не беда — выбор можно оставить на потом. ВАНИТАС | НОЙ ЖАННА ЖАН - ЖАК ДАНТЕ | РИЧЕ АСТОЛЬФО …

custom 52763165695074704154custom 52762799506163045282

7 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC24 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🫥🫥😀🫢😅🫣🙄😅🫣🤥😅🤩🤩🤩 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🤩🤩🤩😄😂😖🙄😅❗️ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 😘 На страницах сегодняшнего выпуска появляется новое имя... ❌ ХЛОЯ😘 ☕️ @ChloedApchierVNK_VG @ChloedApchierVNK_VG 😘вери нашего города вновь открываются ...для нового жителя. …

custom 52763165695074704153❤1custom 52762799506163045281

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @VGazette. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝖵𝖠𝖭𝖨𝖳𝖠𝖲 𝖦𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗍𝗍𝖾 | сетка” (@VGazette), 30 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VGazette.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.