Channel
@VEBAsammeln
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
142subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001327481623 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VEBAsammeln |
| Description | In diesem Kanal teilen wir wichtige und hilfreiche Infos zum Unterschriften sammeln während der zweiten Sammelphase (Jan-April 2026) |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VEBAsammeln |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 142 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:20 | 142 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
15 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 40.0% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 26.7% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 6 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Nach dem Kampf ist vor dem Kampf für eine echte Verkehrswende. Gründe, um an dem Thema dran zu bleiben, gibt es genug. Und sicher wird auch dieser Kanal zukünftig noch dafür genutzt. 🤳 Allerdings wird er nicht mehr von unserer bisherigen Social Media Managerin bespielt, deren feste Stelle nun endet. Bis eine geordnete Übergabe an andere Aktivist*innen stattgefunden hat, wird hier wird hier nichts mehr gepostet. Bye …
🔥1
Ganz weg vom Fenster sind wir noch nicht und laden doch noch einmal zum Plenum ein, bei dem wir wir die Frage diskutieren wollen, wie es nach den Volksbegehren mit unserer Initiative weitergeht. ⁉️ Dafür sammeln wir eure Ideen in einem Pad - trag eure Wünsche und Vorschläge doch bitte bis Sonntagabend ein! Für das Ummweltfestival am Sonntag sucht unsere AG Aktion noch Menschen, die sich vorstellen können, eine Schic…
In der neuen Podcast-Folge ziehen unsere Aktivist*innen Bilanz: Was ist das Resümee nach vier Monaten Unterschriften-Sammelphase? Was bleibt von einer Kampagne, die ihr Ziel am Ende knapp verfehlt hat? Einige unserer Aktiven erzählen von den Gesprächen auf Berlins Straßen, den politischen Debatten, die angestoßen wurden, gefrorenen Kulis im kalten Winter, von Stolz, Frust und der Motivation, jetzt nicht aufzugeben. ✊
🔥2
In den letzten Wochen stellten sich viele die Frage, warum unser Volksbegehren gescheitert ist. Einige behaupteten pauschal, es habe an unserem Gesetz gelegen. Es sei ja klar, dass man mit so einem radikalen Vorschlag keine Mehrheiten gewinnen kann. Wir haben uns mit der Kritik auseinandergesetzt und wollen unser Fazit mit euch teilen.
👏1
In den letzten Wochen stellten sich viele die Frage, warum unser Volksbegehren gescheitert ist. Einige behaupteten pauschal, es habe an unserem Gesetz gelegen. Es sei ja klar, dass man mit so einem radikalen Vorschlag keine Mehrheiten gewinnen kann. Wir haben uns mit der Kritik auseinandergesetzt und wollen unser Fazit mit euch teilen.
❤6
Heute bekamen wir das offizielle Ergebnis unserer Unterschriften-Sammlung: 145.667 Menschen konnten wir von unserem Gesetz für weniger Autos in Berlin überzeugen. ✍️ Das sind nicht genug für einen Volksentscheid, aber es ist eine ganze Menge! Und viele von uns wollen sich weiter für eine sozialere und klimagerechte Verkehrspolitik in Berlin einsetzen. 🚌🚲🚃 Aber erst mal wollen wir feiern - uns und all das, was wir ge…
🎉2👍1👏1🔥1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @VEBAsammeln. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 943,878 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Verkehrsentscheid Berlin 2026 - Unterschriften sammeln” (@VEBAsammeln), 142 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VEBAsammeln.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.