Channel
@V4NTAEGGUK
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
531subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001244115290 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @V4NTAEGGUK |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/V4NTAEGGUK |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 531 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 537 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 537 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 22 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2023 to 7 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
♡ ❍ ⌲ •• ⎙ Liked by @OFCCIRCLEGZ and 1.336.907 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀 ㅤㅤㅤ─────────────────── ㅤ 𝐂𝐈𝐑𝐂𝐋𝐄 𝐆𝐄𝐍 𝐙 .. 𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐋𝐀𝐁𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 ─────────────────── ╭┈──────────────── ✦ : ✦ │ We are very grateful for the interest │ of 30 sq who are interested │ in joining JJ COOLLABORATION │ this time. Your joining and your │ enthusiasm will be a very valuable │ addition to our team. We really │ …
Sticker, posted without a caption
♡ ❍ ⌲ •• ⎙ Like by @OFCRAIDERSS and 985.346.567 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ㅤ ㅤ 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 𝗥𝗔𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗥𝗦 𝗖𝗢𝗟𝗟𝗔𝗕𝗢𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝟭𝟬 𝗦𝗤 📍𝐒𝐏𝐄𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋 𝐓𝐀𝐆 : @Offclembuswana @OFCTHERODERIC @OFCDEVINTIONZZ @VERLAGOSUNITEDSQ @drvgsquad @OFCBIKERS @OFCAMEOUROUX397 @WTMOFC @OFCVALERIOUS @V4NTAEGGUK @ELPHIDRAGENCY @rescurosq View all 200.099 comments 5 minutes ago • 𝗦𝗲𝗲 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 ──────────────────────
File, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
♡ ⌂ ⌲ •• ⎙ ────────────────────── Liked by @OFC022KTH , and 5.197.745 others Masion KTH with 19 Squads displays amazing video content as a result of Collaboration. This Collaboration was held to build closer togetherness, thank you for participating in the Collaboration we are currently holding. View all 15.950.872 comments 9 minutes ago • view translation ─────────────────────…
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ Christmas is a time to touch every heart with love and care. Christmas is a time to receive and send blessings. It's time to breathe the magic in the air. We, the entire V4NTAEGGUK family, wish you a Merry Christmas 2023. May God bless you with the gift of love and the gift of peace not just on Christmas, but for the entire year! #SKIT ⠀
❤1
♡ ㅤㅤ ❍ㅤㅤ ⌲ •• ⎙ Liked by @OFCESCAPE and 42.719.306 others ㅤ 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 𝗘𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗣𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗟𝗟𝗔𝗕𝗢𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 ━━━━━ • • ✦ • • ━━━━━ 🪱💥 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 𝗘𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗣𝗘 big yearbook special mensive collaboration. thankyou to our beloved colleagues for accepting the invitation that we sent. 🪱💥 there's a big hope that in the future we can always maintain unity among ourselves. see y…
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @V4NTAEGGUK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 196,956 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 126 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@V4NTAEGGUK named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“V4ПƬΛΣGGЦK” (@V4NTAEGGUK), 531 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/V4NTAEGGUK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.