Channel
@Urdu_Tahrir_Telegram
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,632subscribers
+29 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001427009325 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Urdu_Tahrir_Telegram |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Urdu_Tahrir_Telegram |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:35 | 3,632 | +5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 3,627 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 3,626 | +17 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:35 | 3,609 | +6 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 3,603 | no change |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:47 | 3,603 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 September 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,709 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 01:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 76.9% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دعا: 🤲 اے اللہ پاک! ہم سے اپنے پردۂ ستر و پوشش کو نہ اٹھانا، اور ہمیں ایسی آزمائش میں مبتلا نہ فرمانا جس پر ہم صبر کرنے کی طاقت نہ رکھتے ہوں۔ اے اللہ! ہم تجھ سے جسم میں راحت، دل میں سکون، اور نفس میں اطمینان کی دعا مانگتے ہیں۔ 🤲🤲🤲🤲 https://t.me/Urdu_Tahrir_Telegram/5174
❤1
نون غنہ کب گرایا جاتا ہے اور کب نہیں؟ ❗️👇 قاعدہ: 👇👇👇 اردو زبان میں منادیٰ مفعول بہ جب جمع کا صیغہ واقع ہو نون غنہ کےساتھ تو (منادیٰ مفعول بہٖ واقع ہونے کی صورت میں اس سے) نون غنہ گر جاتاہے، مثلا: 👇 اے مسلمانو! ✅ اے مسلمانوں! ❌ اے لوگو! ✅ اے لوگوں! ❌ اے بندو! ✅ اے بندوں! ❌ امامِ اہلِ سنت قدس سرہ فرماتے ہیں: 👇 سائلو! دامن سخی کا تھام لو کچھ نہ کچھ انعام ہو ہی جائے گا شعرِ مذکور میں سائلو! منادیٰ مفعول بہ ہے او…
❤1
अल्लाह तअ़ाला हम सब को सरकारे अ़ला ह़ज़रत व फ़तावा रज़विय्या शरीफ से इ़श्क़ की ह़द तक मह़ब्बत अ़त़ा फ़रमाए, आमीन 🤲🤲🤲 अल्लाह तअ़ाला की अ़ता है फ़तावा रज़विय्या मेरे नबी ﷺ का तोह़फ़ा है फ़तावा रज़विय्या शहंशाहे बग़दाद की करामत है फ़तावा रज़विय्या तो फिर मैं क्यों न पढ़ूँ फ़तावा रज़विय्या मेरी जान है फ़तावा रज़विय्या ❤️ जो रज़ा से जितना क़रीब है, वो बग़दाद वाले आक़ा से उतना ही क़रीब है, सिर्फ़ इतना ही नहीं! बल्कि वो …
Allah Ta‘ala ham sab ko Sarkar-e-A‘la Hazrat wa Fatawa Razawiyya se ishq ki had tak mahabbat ata farmaye, Aameen 🤲🤲🤲 Allah Ta‘ala ki ata hai Fatawa Razawiyya Mere Nabi ﷺ ka tohfa hai Fatawa Razawiyya Shahenshah-e-Baghdad ki karamat hai Fatawa Razawiyya To phir main kyun na padhun Fatawa Razawiyya Meri jaan hai Fatawa Razawiyya ❤️ Jo Raza se jitna qareeb hai, wo Baghdad wale Aaqa se utna hi qareeb hai, sirf itna hi…
اللہ تعالیٰ ہم سب کو سرکار اعلیٰ حضرت و فتاویٰ رضویہ سے عشق کی حد تک محبت عطا فرمائے آمین 🤲🤲🤲 اللہ تعالیٰ کی عطا ہے فتاویٰ رضویہ میرے نبی ﷺ کا تحفہ ہے فتاویٰ رضویہ شہنشاہِ بغداد کی کرامت ہے فتاویٰ رضویہ تو پھر میں کیوں نہ پڑھوں فتاویٰ رضویہ میری جان ہے فتاویٰ رضویہ ❤️ جو رضا سے جتنا قریب ہے وہ بغداد والے آقا سے اتنا ہی قریب ہے، صرف اتنا ہی نہیں! بلکہ وہ مدینے والے مصطفیٰ ﷺ سے قریب ہے۔ کیوں کہ میرا رضا نبی کا معجز…
❤1
سوال: 👇👇👇 جماعتِ ثالثہ کے طالبِ علم کے لیے کون سی کتابیں خارجی مطالعہ میں رکھنا مناسب ہے؟ جواب: ✍️👇 جماعتِ ثالثہ کے طالبِ علم کے لیے خارجی مطالعہ میں درج ذیل کتابیں مفید اور مناسب ہیں:👇 📚 فتاویٰ رضویہ، جلدِ اوّل، ابتدائی ۲۰۰ صفحات 📚 بہارِ شریعت، حصہ سوم و چہارم 📚 جاء الحق اور امامِ اہلِ سنت، سرکار اعلیٰ حضرت رضی اللہ تعالیٰ عنہ کے دیگر رسائلِ مبارکہ، مثلاً:👇 🌹 تجلی الیقین شریف 🌹 خالص الاعتقاد 🌹 الأمن والعُلیٰ و…
पहले सब सुन्नी ही थे! ❗️👇 तक़रीबन दो सौ साल क़ब्ल बर्रे सग़ीरे हिन्द के अ़ाम मुसलमान अहले सुन्नत व जमाअ़त ही थे, और उनके दरमियान फ़ातिह़ा ख़ानी, ईसालने सवाब, दुरूद व सलाम और दीगर मामूलाते अहले सुन्नत राइज थे। ✅ फिर जब नज्द से उठने वाले एक बात़िल फ़ित्ने और गुमराह-कुन तहरीक के असरात बर्रे सग़ीर तक पहुँचे तो बाज़ लोगों ने इन्हीं मामूलाते अहले सुन्नत को बिदअ़त व शिर्क क़रार देकर मुसलमानों के दरमियान एक नया फ़ित्ना बरप…
Pahle Sab Sunni Hi The! ❗️👇 Taqreeban do sau saal qabl Barre-Sagheere-Hind ke aam Musalman Ahle-Sunnato-Jama'at hi the, aur unke darmiyan Fatiha Khwani, Isaal-e-Sawab, Durood-o-Salam aur deegar mamoolate-Ahle-Sunnat raaij the. ✅ Phir jab Najd se uthne wale ek baatil fitne aur gumrah-kun tahreek ke asaraat Barre-Sagheer tak pahunche to baaz logon ne inhi mamoolate-Ahl-e-Sunnat ko bid'at-o-shirk qarar dekar Musalmano…
پہلے سب سنی ہی تھے! ❗️👇 تقریباً دو سو سال قبل برصغیرِ ہند کے عام مسلمان اہلِ سنت و جماعت ہی تھے، اور ان کے درمیان فاتحہ خوانی، ایصالِ ثواب، درود و سلام اور دیگر معمولاتِ اہلِ سنت رائج تھے۔ ✅ پھر جب نجد سے اٹھنے والے ایک باطل فتنہ اور گمراہ کن تحریک کے اثرات برصغیر تک پہنچے تو بعض لوگوں نے انہی معمولاتِ اہلِ سنت کو بدعت و شرک قرار دے کر مسلمانوں کے درمیان ایک نیا فتنہ برپا کرنا شروع کردیا۔ نتیجتاً مسلمانوں کے ایمان…
شادی کی غلط رسموں کے خاتمے کی ابتدا کہاں سے ہو؟❗️👇 شادی بیاہ میں رائج غلط اور غیر شرعی رسم و رواج کو ختم کرنے کے لیے سب سے پہلے ہمارے علمائے کرام کو اپنی ذات سے عملی مثال قائم کرنی چاہیے۔ اگر کوئی عالمِ دین اپنی شادی میں فضول خرچی، مطالبات، غیر ضروری رسم و رواج اور دیگر غلط طریقوں سے خود اجتناب کرے گا، تو یقیناً اس کا یہ عملی اقدام دوسروں کے لیے بہترین نمونہ بن سکتا ہے۔ کیونکہ صرف تقریروں میں غلط رسموں کی مذمت کرن…
अच्छा बर्ताव भी नेक अ़मल है! ❗👇 एक शख़्स की बीवी से खाने में ग़लती से नमक तेज़ हो गया, उस के शौहर ने उसे कुछ नहीं कहा, बल्कि दिल में सोचा:👇 "अगर मेरी बेटी से नमक तेज़ हो जाता तो मैं यही चाहता कि: 👇 मेरा दामाद उस की पिटाई न करे, बल्कि उसे माफ़ कर दे।✅ ऐ ख़ुदा! ये भी किसी की बेटी है, और सब से बढ़कर ये कि तेरी बंदी है, मैं तेरी रज़ा की ख़ातिर उसे माफ़ करता हूँ।" जब उस शख़्स का इंतिक़ाल हुआ तो एक वली ने उसे ख़ाब में …
Achchha bartao bhi nek amal hai! ❗👇 Ek shakhs ki biwi se khaane mein ghalti se namak tez ho gaya, us ke shauhar ne use kuchh nahin kaha, balki dil mein socha:👇 "Agar meri beti se namak tez ho jaata to main yahi chahta ke: 👇 mera damaad us ki pitai na kare, balki use maaf kar de.✅ Aye Khuda! Ye bhi kisi ki beti hai, aur sab se badh kar ye ke teri bandi hai, main teri rizaa ke liye khaatir use maaf karta hoon." Jab…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Urdu_Tahrir_Telegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فیضانِ اعلیٰ حضرت چینل✍🏻عقائدِ اہلِ سنت، ردِّ وہابیہ دیابنہ” (@Urdu_Tahrir_Telegram), 3,632 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Urdu_Tahrir_Telegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.