Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
16 measurements spanning 50 days, net -72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 997–1,116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 10:16
1,011
-17
17 Sept 2026, 06:15
1,028
-6
13 Sept 2026, 11:19
1,034
-2
9 Sept 2026, 17:55
1,036
-11
4 Sept 2026, 18:16
1,047
-6
1 Sept 2026, 09:08
1,053
-9
29 Aug 2026, 04:03
1,062
-7
26 Aug 2026, 06:56
1,069
-9
22 Aug 2026, 21:43
1,078
-15
19 Aug 2026, 13:17
1,093
-5
16 Aug 2026, 20:56
1,098
-4
13 Aug 2026, 11:37
1,102
+2
10 Aug 2026, 03:51
1,100
+11
6 Aug 2026, 17:40
1,089
+6
6 Aug 2026, 12:21
1,083
no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:00
1,083
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
254 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 99.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
253
99.6%
👎
1
0.394%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 254 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
چیزی که حالا بیش از هر زمان دیگهای مشخصه، اینه که Bad Omens بیش از اونکه در حال ساختن یک آلبوم جدید باشه، در حال ساختن یک جهان جدیده. اونا دیگه خودشون رو صرفا یک گروه موسیقی نمیبینن. بلکه یک پروژه هنری میدونن که موسیقی فقط یکی از اجزای اونه.
گروه تا امروز درباره این چهار اثر هیچ توضیح کاملی نداده، درباره آلبوم یا آثار بعدی هیچ اطلاعیه رسمی منتشر نکرده و هیچ مصاحبه یا گزارشی هم وجود نداره که دقیقاً مشخص کنه قدم بع…
قطعه Dying To Love نشون داد که گروه همچنان به هویت سینمایی و داستانمحور مرموز خودش وفادار خواهد موند. همون Bad Omensای که طرفدارا میشناسن. تئاتریکال، سنگین و مجذوبکننده.
حتی از نام آهنگ هم میشه چندین برداشت داشت، هم «از شدت عشق در حال نابود شدن» و هم «اشتیاق شدید برای دوست داشتن». به نظرم این دقیقا همون ابهامیه که نوآح و گروه عمدا به دنبال خلقش هستن.
برای توصیف این اثر، منتقدا بارها از کلمه Anthemic (سرودگونه و…
بعد از چند ماه کنجکاو کردن مخاطبا درباره فصل بعدی فعالیت گروه با پیامها و ویدیوهای رمزآلود، Specter بهعنوان اولین سینگل این دوره منتشر شد؛ قطعهای که عملا آغاز دنیای جدید گروه رو رقم زد.
وقتی برای اولین بار به این قطعه گوش کردم، با خودم گفتم: «پسر، صدای نوآح، صدای یه قدیسهست.» شگفتانگیزه که اون چطوری آلبوم به آلبوم، سینگل به سینگل و اجرا به اجرا، صداش بهتر میشه.
از نظر موسیقایی، Specter ترکیبی از یک بالاد احسا…
بعد از موفقیت The Death of Peace of Mind در فوریهی ۲۰۲۲، که بزرگترین موفقیت دوران حرفهای Bad Omens تا اون زمان محسوب میشد، گروه در می ۲۰۲۴ پروژهی CONCRETE JUNGLE رو منتشر کرد. پروژهای که یه آلبوم استودیویی رسمی نبود و بیشتر مجموعهای بهصورت Remix و کامیکطور به حساب میآد.
اما آثار مورد بحث ما حالا چهار سینگلی هست که گروه سال ۲۰۲۵ و تقریبا با فاصلهی یکماهه از یکدیگه، بههمراه چهار موزیکویدیو بهشدت جذاب عر…
سخن نهایی؛ یک بیانیه شاعرانه و ماموریتی:
به Loathe شش سال فرصت دادیم و گفتیم وقتی این آلبوم بیاید باید چیزی بشنویم که همه چیز را درباره بند با آن حس کنیم. این بند ما را ناامید نکرد و از یک اثر مترقی در سبک خودش و همچنین خارج از آن، به ما یک مجموعه آزمایشی موفق را ارائه داد. دریای خلاقیت بند را شنیدیم و در عین حال در جسارت و جنجال آن شرکت کردیم و برای کارهای جدیدتر مشتاقیم.
آلبوم A Stranger To You یک بلوغ عاطفی موفق …
شش سال انتظار برای آغاز یک جنجال:
در دنیای موسیقی همیشه یک قاعده وجود دارد:
نوآوری همواره همه را راضی نمیکند.
این را میتوان در طول تاریخ موسیقی بارها مشاهده کرد و برایش مثالهای متعددی آورد ولی اکنون فقط چند روز از یک اثر خارقالعاده و نوآورانه در دنیای موسیقی متال میگذرد که نماینده یک جنجال قابل انتظار بود.
بند متالکور Loathe، که کار خود را از ده سال قبل آغاز کرده است، اکنون با سومین آلبوم خود به نام A Stranger To Y…
یک جهش الزامی و جسورانه در آهنگسازی:
بند Loathe به عنوان یک خالق آثار منحصربفرد و تازهوارد از آلبوم پیشین خود گفت که قرار نیست اثری که میسازند با دیگران قابل مقایسه باشد. گیتاریست از بندهای اولیه ژانر نو-متال بسیار الهام گرفته، وکالیست صدایش پر از تنوع است که میتوان از کلین های نرم تا اسکریمهایی در سطح Chino Moreno را ایجاد کند، درامر در هر ژانری تبحر دارد و بیسیست استاد ساخت دیوار صوتی پست-متالی است.
این بند هما…
نتیجه یک تولید جنجال برانگیز؛ اشتباه یا هدفمند؟:
استانداردهای یک تولید خوب برای دیده شدن از نظر هر شخصی ممکن است متغیر باشد. ما در طول میکس و مسترینگ یک آلبوم حضور نداریم و درنهایت حاصل را میشنویم و اگر بخواهیم ویدیو پشت صحنه را میبینیم. گاهی این مسیر تولید میتواند خیلی متفاوت باشد و بارها باعث تغییرات پایهای شود. بند Loathe هم به عنوان بندی که خودش همواره این مسئولیت را به عهده میگیرد، این بار نیز خواسته است اثرش …
👍8
Signed ᛑᛗᛛ𒆜ɱર.λ.ε.ʃΨ⌀
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @UploadMagazine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Upload Magazine” (@UploadMagazine), 1,011 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UploadMagazine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
