Channel
@UnknownsCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
187subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001710220829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UnknownsCalls |
| Description | Contact for promo: @WeUnknownn Channel: @UnknownsCalls 帝 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 7 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UnknownsCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 187 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 187 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
48 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 47.9% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 25.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 10.4% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 8.33% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2023 to 14 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Moonuel Macaron - SOL project here some real good backers on this one and marketing also they’ve got some very nice designs and meta it suits the theme ongoing right now! More marketing is coming too can see it doing well over the next few days also their telegram is getting hyped each day that passes, would recommend you guys joining and get ready for this one! https://franc.cc/ https://t.me/moonuelmacaron
❤4❤🔥1👍1🔥1
Some bangers on the way chads! @UnknownsCalls 帝
❤1❤🔥1🔥1
1,000 blocks remain until Bitcoin halving.
❤2
A ludomaniac trader liquidated his entire portfolio for 1.148 million $. He put the whole deposit in long on PEPE (meme-coin) with X3 leverage 🤦♂️. He writes that he doesn't even have 1 thousand dollars on his bank account, everything was on Binance. Just woke up and realized I was liquidated overnight. I was long 3x PEPE. I lost everything I had. I don't even have $1000 in my bank account but I had $1M in bin…
❤1👍1
Book Of Jeeters - bullish looking SOL play good narrative with the meta right now also some very good callers already supporting and more will come, can be a good runner I’ll ape a bag in myself I think with the right momentum can see it sending very easy! @UnknownsCalls 帝 https://dexscreener.com/solana/dxv5pqcxkk7lo2ise8ogjfrwrn3dno2dgg4ngketowas https://t.me/BookOfJeeters
Shazam God Meme On Cardano chain just launched looks promising good marketing and previous project was good and over 50 KOLs on board! they have lots more marketing coming including partnerships, could go from 2 mil to 5 mil also aped some myself. Cool looking memes and photos in their chat also it’s a big telegram team is doxxed looks like a solid buy opportunity to load up can see this doing good long term too wi…
❤3👍1
More coming chads be ready!
🔥2❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤1
MicroStrategy announces plans to become "the world's first Bitcoin development company." The company says it will develop applications and software for the Bitcoin network.
❤1
25% of Ethereum's total supply is now blocked in staking. The total eth supply has also become deflationary since the launch of the Merge update.
❤1
If Bitcoin reaches $50,000, it will liquidate $1,170,000,000,000,000 short positions.
❤1
🪓💀MEME REAPER - $REAPER 💀🪓 🩸'Here to disrupt the current crypto meta by putting an end to the endless cycle of meme coins'🩸 🅾️ Built on a robust blockchain platform, Meme Reaper takes a stand against the superficiality and volatility often associated with meme coins, offering a more stable and sustainable investment alternative. With a strong emphasis on long-term value, Meme Reaper focuses on fundamental principle…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @UnknownsCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,113,549 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@UnknownsCalls named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Unknown 神” (@UnknownsCalls), 187 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UnknownsCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.