Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Unification

Channel

Unification

@UnificationCommunity

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

301subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003476136768
TypeChannel
Username@UnificationCommunity
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/UnificationCommunity

Growth

301324312.512 August 2026 — 324 subscribers12 August 2026 — 324 subscribers20 August 2026 — 318 subscribers27 August 2026 — 301 subscribers12 August 202627 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 298–327 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 22:23301-17
20 Aug 2026, 01:41318-6
12 Aug 2026, 05:30324no change
12 Aug 2026, 05:16324first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

301 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥11337.5%
6621.9%
🤔4214.0%
🫡4113.6%
🙉3913.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 301reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC709 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Подарок передан✅

🙉159🔥2

Signed 𝐒𝐚𝐠𝐞

23 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC678 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Результаты конкурса: 🥳 Победитель: 1. Sама (@Samaban0) Проверить результаты ✅

🤔16🫡9🙉2🔥1

Signed Best Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]

21 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC293 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥1610🤔2🫡2

Signed 𝐒𝐚𝐠𝐞

20 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC218 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @anpeakPhoto

Друзья, всех приветствую!!! Я рад вам сообщить новость о том, что мы объединяемся с парнями из Unification. Мы совместно будем продвигать и вести коммьюнити A New Peak! Что вас ждет у нас: - База, которая нужна каждому: Графический анализ, свечной анализ, индикаторы, классика - То, что сейчас популярно и работает. S&D zones, Ликвидность, Orderblock, Imbalance, и многое другое - Психология - Новости, обучающие пост

🤔10🔥4🫡4🙉2

Signed 𝐒𝐚𝐠𝐞

14 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTC318 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В розыгрыше по прежнему высокие шансы на победу, и они могут быть еще выше, если поделиться им с друзьями😜

🔥17🙉11🤔2

Signed HA7ER

14 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC235 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#2 Количественная торговля ⭐️ Большинство ребят, которые занимаются количественной торговлей, тратят дикие ресурсы на системы, которые сутками работают с рынком без перерыва. Такие системы состоят из математики и статистики, они отлично оптимизированы и постоянно дорабатываются и подстраиваются под те или иные условия для извлечения максимальной выгоды Быть среди них задачка со звездочкой. Сначала матаппарат, затем

🔥15🫡9

Signed HA7ER

13 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC108 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📈Mitigation block Я продолжаю изучать блоки в SMC и сегодня мне на глаза попался Mitigation block Он очень похож на брейкер блок, и основным отличием mitigation-а является отсутствие аномальной активности. Если брейкер своим ложным движением обновлял максимумы и минимумы, то этот не производит таких захватов ликвидности но все равно обеспечивает разворот. Когда входить в сделку? При первом касании, реакция уже може

8🔥2🤔1

Signed 𝐒𝐚𝐠𝐞

11 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC153 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📈Breaker block Недавно решил продолжать изучать SMC, и первое на что я наткнулся стали различные блоки. Хочу рассказать вам о Breaker Block-e , ведь он один из лучших. Его преимущества перед OB: •Легче определить •Выше точность •Лучше отработка Минус: хуже RR(1:1) Как его определить? -Появляется после боковика(флэта) -Появляется аномальное, резкое движение которое является ложным и потом почти сразу перекрывается Ка

🔥63🤔1🫡1

Signed 𝐒𝐚𝐠𝐞

9 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC753 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💎РОЗЫГРЫШ NFT Условия: подписка на: @UnificationCommunity @vsvtm проявление активности Chill Flame Модель: Bear market🐻 t.me/nft/ChillFlame-325627 🏆1 призовое место Итоги: 23 июля в 12:00

19🔥19🫡10🙉4

Signed Best Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]

8 Jul 2026, 19:18 UTC145 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Пожалуйста, реализуйте мою идею: когда вы покупаете криптомонетку, 1 бургер автоматически доставляется вам прямо домой. Это будет гораздо более мотивирующим для инвестиций в проект, чем развитие сети, ускорение транзакций и всякая другая ерунда. Просто бургер домой. Уверен, DeFi способен на такое

🤔3🙉3🔥2

Signed HA7ER

3 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC116 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

3

Signed HA7ER

3 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC104 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#1 Инженерия циклов Как я понял, смысл в том, чтобы вывести практика (тот, кто занимается торговлей) из позиции того, кто непосредственно работает с рынком, и поручить это самосовершенствующемуся циклу. Работа практика - за этим циклом следить По сути работа хедж-фондов тоже представляет собой цикл, только в нем участвует команда, которая из-за своих размеров становится инертной и дорогой (5-10 инженеров, 30-60 ква

🔥62🫡2

Signed HA7ER

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @UnificationCommunity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 201,910 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Unification” (@UnificationCommunity), 301 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UnificationCommunity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.