Channel
@UnidentifiedLegendarry
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001812227895 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UnidentifiedLegendarry |
| Description | Manage |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UnidentifiedLegendarry |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 8 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 8 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 1 post, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2024 to 21 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗟𝗲𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝘆 pinned «🗡 𝗕𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀: ☠𝗠𝗲𝗵𝗱𝗶 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗪𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵𝘆 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗥𝗮𝘆𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗧𝗿𝘆𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗭𝗲𝘂𝘀 ☠𝗩𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗠𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗺𝗮𝗱 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗨𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗕𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗦𝗮𝘃𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ⚠️𝗢𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗳𝗮𝗸𝗲 ! …»
𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗟𝗲𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝘆 pinned «🗡 𝗕𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀: ☠𝗠𝗲𝗵𝗱𝗶 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗪𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵𝘆 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗥𝗮𝘆𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗧𝗿𝘆𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗭𝗲𝘂𝘀 ☠𝗩𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗠𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗺𝗮𝗱 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗨𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗕𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ☠𝗦𝗮𝘃𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ⚠️𝗢𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗳𝗮𝗸𝗲 ! …»
🚨- اینوایت فمیلی 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 باز شد 🔴 • شرایط عضویت : - شرکت در وار و آرپی ها - بلد بودن قوانین مافیا و گنگ - لول بالای +10 و سن بالای +15 • فرم عضویت : - اسم شما : - اسم گیم شما : - سن شما ( +15 ) : - لول گیم ( +10 ) : - اسم شما با تگ ( 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 ) : - آیا سابقه مافیا یا گنگ دارید : - ریک ایم شما از ( Dmz / War ) : ☑️ Pv : @Spowrex ☑️ PV : @lIKnockOutIl
❤3👍1👏1🔥1
𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗟𝗲𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝘆 pinned «𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱(𝗙𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗹𝘆) 🔙 🆕 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚕 𝙾𝚕𝚍 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚕 𝚆𝚊𝚜 𝙳𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚢𝚎𝚍 𝚂𝙾𝙾𝙽...»
𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙚𝙙 𝙇𝙚𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙖𝙧𝙮 𝖱𝗂𝖿𝖺 𝖦𝖺𝗇𝗀 Arius_Unidentified 𝖲𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗍 - 22 𝖤𝗇𝖽 - 47 𝗛𝗲𝗹𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀 | Hispanic Dispoke Esquirewzz
𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙚𝙙 𝙇𝙚𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙖𝙧𝙮 𝖱𝗂𝖿𝖺 𝖦𝖺𝗇𝗀 Arius_Unidentified 𝖲𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗍 - 22 𝖤𝗇𝖽 - ××× 𝗛𝗲𝗹𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀 | Ruthless × Esquierwzz ×Friedrich
𝑀𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑦 𝑈𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐿𝑜𝑠 𝑆𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑉𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝚂 : 22 𝙴𝚗𝚍 : xXx 𝑯𝒆𝒍𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒔 : 𝑫𝒆𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒍𝒚 𝑯𝒊𝒔𝒑𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒄 𝑼𝒏𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒆𝒅 https://t.me/Uncorage_Empire
𝐃𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐒𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐢𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐑𝐢𝐟𝐚 𝐆𝐚𝐧𝐠 𝐒𝐫𝐞𝐛𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐚 𝐃𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭 ~ 22 𝐄𝐧𝐝 ~ 𝐱𝐗𝐱 𝐇𝐞𝐥𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐬 | 𝐇𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 × 𝐔𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞 × 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐝 https://t.me/DefinitelySoldiers
𝑳𝒐𝒔 𝑺𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒐𝒔 𝑽𝒂𝒈𝒐𝒔 𝑺𝒖𝒇𝒍𝒆𝒙 𝑯𝒊𝒔𝒑𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒄 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓𝒕: 57 𝑬𝒏𝒅: 102 𝑭𝒖𝒍𝒍 𝑮𝒉𝒆𝒕𝒕𝒐 𝑮𝒐𝒐𝒅 𝑱𝒐𝒃 𝑩𝒐𝒚𝒔: 𝑼𝒏𝒄𝒐𝒓𝒂𝒈𝒆 , 𝑫𝒆𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒍𝒚 , 𝑼𝒏𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒆𝒅 𝐄𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐨𝐫: @PharaohEditz https://t.me/HispanicBrothers
𝘓𝘰𝘴 𝘚𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘴 𝘝𝘢𝘨𝘰𝘴 𝘚𝘶𝘧𝘭𝘦𝘹 𝘏𝘪𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘤 ( @Levieroze ) 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵 : 57 𝘌𝘯𝘥 : 𝘟𝘹𝘟 𝘏𝘦𝘭𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴 : 𝘋𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺 × 𝘜𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦 × 𝘜𝘯𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘦𝘥 ×
× UNIDENTIFIED LEGENDARY × × L.S VAGOS × × ZEPHYR UNIDENTIFIED × START 22 END 57 HELPERS : @XCHOZONECLAN EDITED BY : @Xtront
𝑇𝑖𝑓𝑜 𝑈𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐸.𝑆 𝐵𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝚂𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚝 : 22 𝙼𝚊𝚡 : 32 𝙴𝚗𝚍 : 30 𝚃𝚑𝚡 𝙵𝚘𝚛 𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚙𝚜 : @Silvacherzzclwn 𝚊𝘭𝘱𝘩𝘢𝘙𝘗 Editor:@SheynOff https://t.me/Uncorage_Empire
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @UnidentifiedLegendarry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,033,629 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@UnidentifiedLegendarry named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗟𝗲𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝘆” (@UnidentifiedLegendarry), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UnidentifiedLegendarry.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.