Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мыслильня

Channel

Мыслильня

@UnholyAbode

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

306subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001956014335
TypeChannel
Username@UnholyAbode
Created18 May 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/UnholyAbode

Growth

306313309.57 August 2026 — 313 subscribers8 August 2026 — 313 subscribers15 August 2026 — 310 subscribers22 August 2026 — 306 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 305–314 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 02:05306-4
15 Aug 2026, 03:39310-3
8 Aug 2026, 07:35313no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:02313first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

403 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥9924.6%
🔥8320.6%
🏆6115.1%
custom 53638194672372430326014.9%
custom 53460046300882017725012.4%
💅389.43%
🍾81.99%
👏40.993%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 403reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 17 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @UnholyAbode. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 February 2026 to 17 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 May 2026, 09:34 UTC514 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Продолжая разговор, хочется упомянуть, что СХС ОЧЕВИДНО набирают аудиторию самым лёгким образом (у них, безусловно, и сюжеты крутые, но, как правило, многим игрокам абсолютно похую на это, дайте только красивых мужиков, и даже самую стрёмную историю можно читать и терпеть), однако чем это чревато? Ну тем, что у них мужчинки буквально на одно лицо, и я даже не преувеличиваю. Для меня это на самом деле не то чтобы мину

🔥9🏆1💅1

17 May 2026, 09:34 UTC381 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Никак не могу смириться с тем, что люди, вместо того, чтобы играть в оба приложения, хуесосят одно или другое. Давайте честно и откровенно — везде есть свои достоинства и недостатки. "Носатые", "горбатые", как круто хуесосить КР за реалистичность и детализированность, инаковость и уникальность персонажей. Вот ни одного "носатого" героя (или героиню) я не считала некрасивым (взять ту же Теодору, которую по сей день х

🔥5💅2🏆1

16 May 2026, 12:02 UTC339 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Типаж как будто бы есть и как будто бы и нет 🫪 #кр

💅7🔥2

10 May 2026, 10:39 UTC426 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Играю теперь ещё и в схс (приложение по типу кр). И сука как же меня бомбит я уже красный культурно не получится. У этого приложения есть свои достоинства я обнову майскую ждала даже больше чем у кр (хотя кр я безусловно предана так же как и раньше). Но блять меня прям разрывает и от всей ситуации в целом и от людей которые схс защищают. Обнову обещали В НАЧАЛЕ месяца и ну собственно где? Не я всё понимаю началом мож

💅4🏆2🔥2

9 May 2026, 06:33 UTC347 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hinatasunshine

Сейчас пересматриваю аватара аанга, и, знаете, невольно, естественно, проскакивают некоторые ассоциации с персонажами "naruto". Я думаю, вы уже понимаете, к чему я клоню. Зуко и Хината, конечно, персонажи совсем разные, однако некоторое сходство есть, например: оба были лишены титула наследника, оба из-за отца. И вот ни у одного смертного не возникала мысль, что Зуко виноват сам, что он был слишком, якобы мягким, а н

🏆12🔥6

9 May 2026, 06:23 UTC337 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Фансервис который мы заслужили, фансервис который я одобряю 🫪

❤‍🔥15💅5🍾4🔥2

8 May 2026, 15:07 UTC316 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну и пж о реакциях не забывайте смотрите теперь их сколько 🤭

💅19🍾4🔥4❤‍🔥2

8 May 2026, 15:02 UTC660 views50 reactions8 Starsread 8 August 2026

https://teletype.in/@er-157365/waCXie18qat Совсем небольшая статья про Учих 🥀 #статья #саскеучиха #итачиучиха

❤‍🔥32🔥10🏆8

1 May 2026, 09:30 UTC400 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Отрицаю романтизацию сакуино 🤩 Только токсичный юри, только хардкор 🥰 #thread

custom 534600463008820177218❤‍🔥8custom 53638194672372430326🔥3

15 Apr 2026, 11:34 UTC987 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Тупа Саске когда Итачи (после правды) 🤩

custom 534600463008820177213❤‍🔥4custom 53638194672372430323🔥2

15 Apr 2026, 11:11 UTC502 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Когда речь заходит о НОРМАЛЬНОЙ мужской дружбе в "naruto", первые, кто приходит на ум, — это Шикамару и Наруто (после — Гай и Какаши, ну и напоследок Шикамару и Чоджи, естественно). Но давайте поставим пусть и похожий, но все-таки другой вопрос: кто первый всплывает в памяти, говоря о нормальных, не побоюсь этого слова земных братских отношениях? Хаширама и Тобирама, очевидно. Если мне память не изменяет, это единств

🏆12❤‍🔥6custom 53460046300882017722custom 53638194672372430321

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @UnholyAbode. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мыслильня” (@UnholyAbode), 306 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UnholyAbode.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.