Channel
@UkraineNaziWatch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,095subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001677291748 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UkraineNaziWatch |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UkraineNaziWatch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 1,095 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 1,098 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 1,098 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 13 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (13 March 2025 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 225 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
163 reactions across 9 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤮 | 47 | 28.8% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 13.5% | |
| 😱 | 16 | 9.82% | |
| 🤣 | 16 | 9.82% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 9.20% | |
| ✍ | 10 | 6.13% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 5.52% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 4.29% | |
| 😡 | 7 | 4.29% | |
| 😈 | 4 | 2.45% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 1.84% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.613% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.613% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.613% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.613% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.613% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Arbejderen (Denmark): The laundering of a Ukrainian variant of fascism, 2025 The article dissects recent laundering attempts to whitewash the Ukraine history as a struggle for democracy. Stetsko, and the OUN-B wanted a sovereign Ukraine is a Ukrainian satellite state of The “Third Reich”, and they had, according to the Swedish-american historian Per A. Rudling adopted the “national socialist worldview” and the idea …
👍3✍2🤮1🦄1
Bellingcat: Ukrainian nazis trained by major European Security Firm, 2018 For those interested what was going on in Ukraine from 2014 to 2018 and the reasons for the Civil War in Donbass. But, please, after reading the article and seeing the photos be very cautious when making this logical leap: to paint Azov as 100% Nazi organization within Ukraine military. I bet there is someone in Azov who is not Nazi affiliate…
✍8😱3🔥2😢2😁1😈1
NYTimes: Ukraine is eager to highlight its advances in drones [yet highlights advances in the Nazi arts], 2026 Another New York Times article, another Ukraine nazi with The Black Sun in the photo. Just in case here is the Archive link ( keep in mind: the archive compresses the images, and the emblems will be virtually unrecognizable. For a HD photo, please visit the original article). P.S. More on the topic of "t…
🤮14❤1🤝1
Official President's account: "But the president is a Jew" awards Ukraine soldiers wearing SS patches, 2025 During his trip to Myrnohrad, Zelensky awarded soldiers from the 4th Rapid Reaction Brigade of the National Guard "Rubezh". The brigade's number 4 is stylized as the "ᛋᛋ" runes of the Nazi SS battalions of the WWII. Let's be clear here, the brigade number is 4 not 44, and why pick such a font? Must be a coinc…
🤮16❤3😱3
🇨🇦🇺🇦 CBC News filmed a report at “an elite training facility in Kiev,” where the 3rd Assault Brigade — the rebranded AZOV battalion — conducts its drills. They blurred out the instructor’s swastika in the video itself but forgot to remove it from the thumbnail. Given that Canada proudly applauded an SS Galicia veteran in its Parliament, there’s hardly any point in blurring Nazi tattoos anymore. They clearly don’t m…
🤣16🤮4👎3
Junge Welt (Germany): The Nazi movement colonizes Ukrainian society with war ideology, 2025 The 3rd Separate "Azov" Assault Brigade, (currently being expanded into a corps) has been at the vanguard of Ukraine's fascist reorganization for years. It seeks to form state and nation into an "organic unity"... Oleksiy "Consul" Reins, head of its Center for Ideological Training and its Rainshouse publishing house, promote…
😱10😡7❤3⚡1🤮1
Le Monde (France): Key element of the Ukraine military is full of neo-nazis, 2025 [the 3rd brigade is] heir to the Azov regiment. Today, the unit is a key part of the Ukrainian military. However, behind a tightly controlled social media image, some of its soldiers continue to display symbols and other references to Nazism. The investigative video of which the article is about (in French): For English use the auto …
👍18🔥4🤔1
Foreign Policy: The truth is that a sizable portion of Kiev’s government are fascists, 2014 quote: But while Western governments and pundits are correct to dismiss Putin’s pretenses for invading Ukraine, they are wrong to presume his Ukrainian opponents are necessarily in the right. The uncomfortable truth is that a sizeable portion of Kiev’s current government — and the protesters who brought it to power — are, i…
😁13🔥3
Jerusalem Post: Ukrainian Security Service General threatens to "destroy" the country's Jews, 2017 Vovk, who still holds a senior reserve rank with the Security Service of Ukraine, posted on Facebook: “I am completely against Jews,” and “You are not Ukrainians and I will destroy you along with Rabinovich” – an apparent reference to Vadim Rabinovich, a Ukrainian Jewish businessman and politician. And another article…
🤮11😈3👍1😁1🙈1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @UkraineNaziWatch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 881,741 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UkraineNaziWatch” (@UkraineNaziWatch), 1,095 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UkraineNaziWatch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.