Yes..Finally!
⚡3👍2

Channel
@Uaithne14
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
114subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001881853939 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Uaithne14 |
| Description | 14 Words |
| Created | 30 January 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Uaithne14 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 114 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 114 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 14 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
151 reactions across 17 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 18.5% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 17.9% | |
| 🤮 | 16 | 10.6% | |
| 💯 | 13 | 8.61% | |
| 🤬 | 12 | 7.95% | |
| 👎 | 9 | 5.96% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 4.64% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 4.64% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 3.97% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 3.31% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 3.31% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 3.31% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.99% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 1.32% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.662% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.662% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.662% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.662% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 0.662% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.662% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2024 to 17 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Yes..Finally!
⚡3👍2
An important little video here by Gareth Icke. I don't align with Gareth or his dad on everything, but I think they're both insightful men doing good work, overall. In this video, Gareth mentions that the only people going to prison for 'hate speech' are those who plead guilty to it, or plead guilty to anything. I don't know enough about the numerous cases of this happening to know if it's true, but it would make s…
👍1
5,200 people from 132 countries are being granted Irish Citizenship today and tomorrow in Co. Kerry. Applicants from India make up over 20% of those attending the ceremonies (1,188), followed by applicants from Brazil (572), Romania (462), the United Kingdom (416), Poland (382), Philippines (271), South Africa (199), Pakistan (186), Nigeria (176) and China, including Hong Kong (154). Since the introduction of citiz…
🤮7🤬2
The UK has announced Digital IDs will be mandatory to work. (Above Central Bank Digital Currencies status by economy) No ID = No job. This isn't just an idea. This is happening. Not for convenience. Not for safety. But for control. Agenda 2030 is unfolding before your eyes. What is a digital ID? A government-controlled profile that links: Your biometric data (face, fingerprints, iris) Passport, bank accou…
👍2
Nationalist protests show strength, but without strategy, they become background noise. The regime waits it out, runs a smear campaign, and resumes its agenda. This is their cycle and you are meant to be trapped in it. The real enemy does not sit in the Dail. They do not wear robes in the four courts. They sit behind NGO logos, university walls, and “equality” commissions, designing the chains that bind your tongue,…
👏5👍3💯2🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
🎉6💯3🤡2🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤬10
18 years old. Andy O’Donoghue took it upon himself to petrol bomb a facility meant to house third-world invaders in Dublin. He risked everything to do what needed to be done. Because of one boy, the enemy won’t be sleeping in warm beds at our expense, but we can sleep better knowing that. Thanks to that one kid. For his actions, he has been sentenced to five years in prison, punished not for a crime, but for resisti…
🔥23🫡5⚡4💩2💯2❤1👍1💊1
Jewish subversive tactics revealed. Trump's EO on South Africa doesn't mention "Whites" at any point--but it mentions Israel in the first paragraph! The purpose of these sanctions is to punish SA for its actions against Israel, period. The plight of Whites is the excuse and the smokescreen. And even then, the Trump solution is the same as the Palestinians in Gaza: "help" them to resettle elsewhere, in other words…
👍6🔥1
Filthy Communist George Galloway on his role in engineering White genocide in South Africa. Interesting sentence at the end: "Every house I slept in, every dinner I ate, every car I drove in, was provided by Jewish activists of the African National Congress [African Communist party]"
🤮9👍2👎2
Even if Aaron Bushnell was not a self-hating, Abrahamic, far-left Communist ideologue, even if he was not a part of the LGBT crowd, even if he resembled some image of a dissident, the fact still remains – he committed political protest-suicide in total defense of Arab Muslims and, by extension, of Salafi jihadism. He burned himself to death chanting a slogan completely out of solidarity with his own race. He hated h…
💯5👎1
"Based" Keith Woods and his cringe takes. I know it's an old post. But, his views never changed.
🤡3✍1👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Uaithne14. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Uaithne” (@Uaithne14), 114 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Uaithne14.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.