Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

US politics 🇺🇲

@USPolity

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

90subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001848132855
TypeChannel
Username@USPolity
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/USPolity

Growth

8890899 Aug 2026, 14:45 — 88 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 15:17 — 88 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 09:38 — 90 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 14:4510 Aug 2026, 09:38
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 88–90 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 09:3890+2
9 Aug 2026, 15:1788no change
9 Aug 2026, 14:4588first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
172.8%
avg views ÷ 90 subscribers
Avg views / post
156
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total3,110
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 05s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC≈2,450 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

پایان جنگ بدون توافق؟ وال استریت ژورنال: ترامپ آماده است به محض باز شدن تنگهٔ هرمز از سوی ایرانیان، به درگیری پایان دهد، حتی بدون توافق هسته‌ای. به گفتهٔ منابع درون دولت، در گفت‌وگوهای غیرعلنی تأکید کرده‌اند: «ما تأسیسات هسته‌ای را از بین برده‌ایم، ماهواره‌ها تحولات میدان را رصد می‌کنند، و ایران تا پایان دورهٔ ترامپ جرات هیچ اقدامی نخواهد داشت. @USPolity

9 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC31 viewsread 9 August 2026

🎵 A Horse With No Name — اسبی بی‌نام 🐎 دیوئی بانل (Dewey Bunnell)، یکی از بنیان‌گذاران گروه America، تنها ۱۹ سال داشت. آن زمان در انگلستان زندگی می‌کرد و پدرش در پایگاه‌های نیروی هوایی آمریکا خدمت می‌کرد. دیوئی از باران‌های همیشگی انگلستان خسته شده بود و برای فرار از این فضای خاکستری، شروع کرد به کشیدن تصاویری از بیابان. در یکی از نقاشی‌ها روی تصویر نوشت: «بیابانی سرشار از زندگی». او در آن دوران به آثار سالوادور دا

9 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC23 viewsread 9 August 2026

📌 رأی سیاه‌پوستان؛ حلقه تعیین‌کننده در انتخابات نوامبر میشیگان 🎯 پیروزی عبدل السید در رقابت درون‌حزبی دموکرات‌ها با اختلافی بسیار اندک به دست آمد و او موفق به جلب حمایت بخش قابل‌توجهی از رأی‌دهندگان سیاه‌پوست نشد . در دیترویت، رأی‌دهندگان سیاه‌پوست به‌طور قاطع به رقیب سنتی‌تر او رأی دادند و نظرسنجی‌ها نشان می‌دهد که عبدل السید پیش از انتخابات تنها حدود ۲۱٪ از حمایت آنان را در اختیار داشت . ⚠️ این شکاف در ایالتی که د

8 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC22 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

سنای آمریکا تاد بلانش را به‌عنوان دادستان کل ایالات متحده تأیید کرد. در میان جمهوری‌خواهان، تنها سوزان کالینز و لیزا مورکوفسکی به او رأی مخالف دادند. دانلد ترامپ وکیل شخصی خودش را به این سمت منصوب کرده است؛ چیزی که برای هر رئیس‌جمهوری می‌تواند یک رؤیای سیاسی باشد و حالا قرار است دو سال و نیم ادامه پیدا کند. اما اینکه رابطه و دوستی میان ترامپ و بلانش تا پایان این دوره دوام خواهد آورد یا نه، هنوز مشخص نیست. پاسخ این پ

8 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC27 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

حمایت پنهانی ترامپ از ونس؟ 📰 واشنگتن پست فاش کرده است که دونالد ترامپ در دیداری خصوصی با حامیان مالی، از معاون اول خود، جیدی ونس، برای انتخابات ۲۰۲۸ حمایت کرده است. ترامپ در دفتر بیضی به حامیان گفته است: "در پایان روز، ما باید جی‌دی را انتخاب کنیم." با این حال، وی در ملاء عام از رقابت بین ونس و مارکو روبیو سخن می‌گوید و مشاورانش تأکید دارند که این حمایت را نباید قطعی تلقی کرد. 📊 نظرسنجی آتلاس اینتل نشان می‌دهد که ر

8 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC25 viewsread 9 August 2026

📝 خلاصه: 🗳️ انتخابات میان‌دوره‌ای نزدیک است و حزب ترامپ با دردسرهای جدی روبه‌روست. 🔻 دردسر جنگ با ایران: ذخایر مهمات آمریکا به‌شدت کاهش یافته؛ ذخایر موشک‌های پاتریوت دو سوم و ذخایر تاد نصف شده است. ترامپ «افشاگران» را مقصر می‌داند و آن‌ها را به زندان تهدید کرده است. 🏭 جبران کمبود موشک‌ها سال‌ها زمان می‌برد و صنایع دفاعی توان همگام شدن با نیازها را ندارند. حتی برخی قانون‌گذاران جمهوری‌خواه نیز درباره آمادگی آمریکا

8 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC31 viewsread 9 August 2026
File

🍿 Washington Week with The Atlantic full episode, August 7, 2026 @USPolity

8 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC35 viewsread 9 August 2026

هر شنبه، برنامه‌ی «واشینگتن ویک با آتلانتیک» رو برای شما قرار میدهیم. نگاهی کارشناسی و بی‌طرفانه به مهم‌ترین اتفاقات سیاسی آمریکا در هفته‌ای که گذشت، در کنار خبرنگاران و تحلیل‌گران سرشناس. زبان این برنامه انگلیسی هست و بصورت Audio قرار میدیم چون حجم ویدیو ممکنه بالا باشه و بخاطر مسائل اینترنت.... . پیشنهاد میشه دنبال کنید. @USPolity

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @USPolity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 814,333 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“US politics 🇺🇲” (@USPolity), 90 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/USPolity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.