Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 美国漏打交流群

Supergroup

美国漏打交流群

@USA_Sep_Chat

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

8,630members

-489 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

19 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001641695057
TypeSupergroup
Username@USA_Sep_Chat
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 October 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/USA_Sep_Chat

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,6309,1478,888.519 August 2026 — 9,119 members20 August 2026 — 9,147 members23 August 2026 — 9,147 members24 August 2026 — 9,106 members27 August 2026 — 9,044 members30 August 2026 — 8,992 members2 September 2026 — 8,973 members7 September 2026 — 8,946 members11 September 2026 — 8,906 members15 September 2026 — 8,886 members26 September 2026 — 8,810 members5 October 2026 — 8,728 members12 October 2026 — 8,683 members15 October 2026 — 8,630 members19 August 202615 October 2026
14 measurements spanning 56 days, net -489. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,552–9,225 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
15 Oct 2026, 00:048,630-53
12 Oct 2026, 02:028,683-45
5 Oct 2026, 01:568,728-82
26 Sept 2026, 13:378,810-76
15 Sept 2026, 07:158,886-20
11 Sept 2026, 21:018,906-40
7 Sept 2026, 03:588,946-27
2 Sept 2026, 14:238,973-19
30 Aug 2026, 14:158,992-52
27 Aug 2026, 21:069,044-62
24 Aug 2026, 11:549,106-41
23 Aug 2026, 21:459,147no change
20 Aug 2026, 09:229,147+28
19 Aug 2026, 13:459,119first reading

Engagement

No public post preview. We read this entry on 24 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“美国漏打交流群” (@USA_Sep_Chat), 8,630 members as measured 15 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/USA_Sep_Chat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.