Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

US Politics

@USAPol2022

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,415subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001426580161
TypeChannel
Username@USAPol2022
Created16 March 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/USAPol2022

Growth

2,4152,4192,4176 August 2026 — 2,419 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,419 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,417 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,415 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,414–2,420 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:332,415-2
9 Aug 2026, 09:532,417-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:302,419no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:242,419first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 9 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

349 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁9126.1%
🔥6618.9%
👍6518.6%
4312.3%
🤯4212.0%
👏185.16%
🥰113.15%
🤔102.87%
👎20.573%
😢10.287%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 349reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTC879 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Стрім 12 зірок про україно-польські стосунки і перспективи євроінтеграції в цьому контексті. Майже почали!

6👍2🔥2🥰1

9 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTC811 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @XIIsterne

🇪🇺Ми розпочали. Долучаємось до розмови за посиланням!

🔥4👍31

12 Jun 2026, 18:21 UTC≈2,150 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ви помітили яку увагу викликав Хантер Байден останнім часом? Його активність в соціальних мережах, відвертість висловлювань і очевидно ексцентричний образ зробили його зіркою твіттера. А тепер і Ньюсом його на подкаст покликав. Ви спитаєте чи я натякаю на його політичне майбутнє? Звісно ні. Ну яке майбутнє може бути у непутящого сина колишнього президента, ще й з історією залежності. О, чекайте. Спитайте Буша! Як

😁45🔥41👍1🤔1

11 Jun 2026, 17:57 UTC≈1,540 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

За декілька хвилин починаємо стрім «12 зірок». Сьогодні говоримо про Францію. Долучайтесь!

👍11🔥3🥰1

29 May 2026, 17:02 UTC≈2,060 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Стало цікаво чому ростуть рейтинги Піта. А за останні пів року він зробив те що у нього добре виходить: був ефективним комунікатором позицій демократів. Він відносно вдало балансує між захистом спадщини адміністрації Байдена і атаками на Трампа. Зокрема в питаннях економіки. Ось один з прикладів, коли в інформаційно ворожому оточенні він досить гостро та артикульовано доводить розгубленим консервативним ведучим,

👍12🔥105🤔2

28 May 2026, 18:38 UTC≈1,680 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🫏🔵Ще одне опитування: Буттіджеч 18% Ньюсом 16% АОС 11% Шапіро 10% Гаріс 10% Бешир 9% ХЗ 18%

🤯10😁4👍31

27 May 2026, 07:58 UTC≈1,680 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пакстон впевнено перемагає чинного сенатора Корніна в праймеріз. Цей сезон праймеріз в республіканській партії — це справжня різанина, де під ніж пішли всі, хто хоч трохи проявляв ознаки несумісності з Трампом. Тут і сенатори штату Індіана (досить локальний рівень), які раніше не підтримали ініціативи Трампа щодо перемалювання меж виборчих округів. Тут же сенатор Біл Кессіді і конгресмен Томас Мессі — один критик

👏14👍63🤯3😁2🥰1

14 May 2026, 18:04 UTC≈1,460 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @XIIsterne

🇪🇺Ми розпочали. Долучаємось до розмови за посиланням!

👍74🥰1

14 May 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,790 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Чим займаєтесь сьогодні ввечері? Пропоную послухати наш стрім. Поговоримо про реваншистські основи ЄС, без яких нам цього явища не зрозуміти. Будете слухати?

🔥101🥰1

12 May 2026, 19:37 UTC≈1,810 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Хто на вашу думку переміг би в 2028?

  1. АОС23%
  2. Рубіо77%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 May 2026, 18:38 UTC≈2,190 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

До мідтермів-2026 трохи менше півроку, але багатьох уже цікавлять президентські вибори 2028. І ось маємо опитування, кого демократи і республіканці хотіли б бачити в бюлетенях. 🫏🔵 Топ-кандидати від демократів: Александрія Оказіо-Кортез 26% Піт Буттіджеч 22.4% Ґевін Ньюсом 21.2% Камала Гаріс 12.9% 🐘🔴 Топ-кандидати від республіканців: Марко Рубіо 45.4% Джей Ді Венс 29.6% Рон Десантіс 11.2% Цілком логічне, хоча мо

🤯26🤔5👍4😁31😢1

18 Apr 2026, 11:25 UTC≈1,860 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @XIIsterne

🇪🇺 Радіостанція «Директива фон дер Ляєн» Оперативно викладаємо запис нашої крайньої розмови про вибори в Угорщині. Орбан програв, хто тепер буде надокучати Брюсселю? Чи готова Європа приймати рішення щоб не допустити появи нових Орбанів? Що чекає на правих популістів? Чи зможуть союзники новообраного премʼєра по Європейській Народній Партії скористатися рецептом? І чому Христове Воскресіння вкотре нагадує про спра

👍5🔥4👏21

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @USAPol2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 May 2026, 19:37 UTCAnonymous Poll552 voters

Хто на вашу думку переміг би в 2028?

  1. АОС23%
  2. Рубіо77%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 9 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 694,100 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“US Politics” (@USAPol2022), 2,415 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/USAPol2022.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.