Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЭуЭ KREMARIK

Channel

ЭуЭ KREMARIK

@UNU_KREMARIK

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

80subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001654360820
TypeChannel
Username@UNU_KREMARIK
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/UNU_KREMARIK

Growth

5581686 August 2026 — 55 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55 subscribers22 August 2026 — 67 subscribers29 August 2026 — 79 subscribers8 September 2026 — 81 subscribers17 September 2026 — 80 subscribers806 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 41 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51–85 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 00:0180-1
8 Sept 2026, 07:3981+2
29 Aug 2026, 04:1279+12
22 Aug 2026, 23:4667+12
10 Aug 2026, 08:0155no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:4655first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52760264186968335645351.5%
custom 52854198643604987672322.3%
custom 52830547976692837021110.7%
custom 54135966607291393381110.7%
custom 527375104380765824043.88%
🤡10.971%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC18 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

А теперь из новостей Мне подарили на др ноут, так что я постепенно осваиваю криту💊

custom 52854198643604987677

7 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC26 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

А теперь причина, по которой я долго отсутствовала : Ивенты. Я их набрала сразу несколько штук, так что большую часть времени занималась ими ( а также я просто откладывала все до последнего ) А теперь к картинкам. Это итоги работы тайного адепта от Сун) Суть ивента была в том , чтобы нарисовать другому персонажу по черно-белому мудборду. Я нарисовала персонажа в стиле Солярпанк, а мне, по моему запросику, нарисовали

custom 54135966607291393389

7 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC25 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Знали бы вы, как мне стыдно со своего старого видео ( а вернее - с его наличия) , но удалять я его не буду, так как его все еще смотрят 🥺

custom 52760264186968335648

7 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC35 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Не судите строго, я не люблю монтировать 🥺 https://youtu.be/SJh_RGsbh20?is=GHe0j4bUs3dYfPLJ

custom 52760264186968335647

5 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC23 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Родные, я ебу дала 🙂

custom 52854198643604987678custom 52760264186968335645custom 52737510438076582404

5 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC23 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Я только что поняла, что в спокойной музыке, которую я вставляла в последние свои видео ( для других ивентов ) , Какой-то прикол в середине ,а я то до середины не слушаю .😐

custom 52830547976692837025

4 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC26 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Два дня работы над рендером. Добейте меня 😳 Автор идеи ( такой же мученик, как я) и создатель лайна : @For_x_in_rang

custom 52830547976692837026custom 52760264186968335645custom 52854198643604987672

3 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC31 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Народ, не теряем, я в монтаже 🐈

custom 527602641869683356411

1 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC45 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

А вот и моя красоточка А ей идет 😃

custom 527602641869683356412🤡1

1 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC47 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @secretssquadPhoto

⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀💀 ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀 💀 💀💀 💀💀 💀💀💀💀💀 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀 ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ Большой коллаб между @TheDarknesssqd и @secretssquad «Со мной договорились, чтобы мы делали вид, что работаем у них, а они у нас. И какой у них шикарный директор! Редко такого увидишь, ставлю ему «лосяру» 👍» — Константин Скелетрон Художники: 1. @UNU_KREMARIK — @aftwb 2.

custom 52760264186968335645custom 54135966607291393382

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @UNU_KREMARIK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЭуЭ KREMARIK” (@UNU_KREMARIK), 80 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UNU_KREMARIK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.