Bro you're supposed to be moving at Hyperspeed If you told an older guy that at 20 years old he could buy a laptop and start making 100k/m he would move so fast BECAUSE IMAGINE BEING YOUNG, AND RICH?? THATS WAY BETTER THAN OLD AND RICH And I don't even need to imagine, it's a reality for me But the thing is, you guys just numb all that fire with TikTok, porn, youtube videos If you're in this channel YOU HAVE AM…

Channel
Twitter Mastermind
@TwitterMastermind
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
158subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002361126614 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TwitterMastermind |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TwitterMastermind |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 158 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 159 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 159 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 8 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 7s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Coded a Twitter Drops system. Built it once. Now it prints cash. $100K months. Barely lift a finger. This thing runs itself — I just watch it work. Discovering this felt like hitting a gold mine. Now my members in the Mastermind get all the insider knowledge. Unlock the blueprint
You online live once. People like me and my members are stacking wins while you’re snoozing. Printing money while you binge Netflix. Building empires while you scroll aimlessly. Winners don’t sleep on themselves. Losers always got a reason. Stop being in no man's land and just pick a side.
📣📣 CHANGING THE GROUP FROM X METHOD TO TWITTER MASTERMIND Most people think of X as Twitter - so I think it suits more. Everything stays the same. Message me if you want in @RealDrX
Lambo day — thanks to OFM. Can’t name another business that’s this fun, scalable, and profitable. There’s always another level to hit with your model or agency. That’s why I don’t stop. The job’s never done. The ones winning? We just know more than you. Just learn from people actually making millions, simple. Learn the Method
Most of these gurus love making online business sound harder than it is. The reason 55% of people never start an online hustle is because this shit is a JUNGLE (factual information) People bullshit to push some overpriced ‘course’ and promise you’ll get rich. Don’t be a clown and fall for it. Time wasted now is time your NEVER getting back. Why wait around when you can just pay a measly fee for all the right info…
Getting these testimonials everyday just confirms it I'm the twitter goat. What your mentor’s teaching you now? I did that half a year ago. If you’re not learning from me, you’re already late. Unlock Premium
I poured everything into building the X Method time, money, sleep, all of it. I’m walking into billionaire territory with this. No doubt. My traffic method prints money. Simple as that. A lot of you are asking for the details on the group. Check the pinned message
You’re done losing. Everyone else is printing off OFM why not you? Still doubting? See for yourself 👇 https://t.me/TMResults
This life’s too good bruh. And people still sleep on Twitter like it’s not about to be the best social media platform in the WORLD for marketing. Forget OFM a moment, just in general it’s insane Learn my fucking ways and actually start printing with your model TODAY Learn the method
The most underrated skill in business? TIME MANAGEMENT. Master this, and not only will you get further you’ll actually enjoy the ride. That’s why it’s so important to PAY for the right information. Your basically just time traveling
I’m traveling the world with my girl and making money straight from my laptop. Isn’t that the dream? Even better my members are doing it too. Living life on their terms and still stacking cash. This could be you. All it takes is starting now and actually doing the work. Message me to unlock the X Method. @RealDrX
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @TwitterMastermind. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@TwitterMastermind named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Twitter Mastermind” (@TwitterMastermind), 158 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TwitterMastermind.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.