TweetBird Official pinned a photo

Channel
TweetBird Official
@TweetBird_Official
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
368subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001614941579 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TweetBird_Official |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TweetBird_Official |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 368 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 371 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 371 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
20 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 60.0% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 30.0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 5.00% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2023 to 5 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Hello all - Jeremy here. I've switched focuses from this channel/degening to the following two things: 1. Gathering stats for groups/channels (maybe more on this later) 2. Moving towards full automation for crypto The branding for this channel has less significance of course because the Twitter name change. And also my switch in focus means not making many random calls. A rebrand for the channel in line with auto…
👍6❤2
Live stream started
In the market today: US announcing crypto action: DUMP DUMP DUMP!!!! 😱😱 Announcement is Binance settlement: PUMP PUMP PUMP 🎉🎉 Market bipolar 😅 Practically though... be careful on doing a lot of activity today... might be best to wait for things to settle down.
❤1👍1
TweetBird Official pinned «How to break down a project? Check; - Contract Address – Is it reannounced? If not, why? - Liquidity Lock: How long is the liq lock? - Tokenomics (Any unlocked tokens or tokens unlocking soon) - Tax ( if modifiable)-(is there a marketing wallet? if yes…»
Very nice guide
👍1
How to break down a project? Check; - Contract Address – Is it reannounced? If not, why? - Liquidity Lock: How long is the liq lock? - Tokenomics (Any unlocked tokens or tokens unlocking soon) - Tax ( if modifiable)-(is there a marketing wallet? if yes, is it being spent for improvement?) - Holders both % and numbers - Website (if any utility is alive, such as staking) - Twitter (Check alive since when and ac…
❤3
We have missed a couple decent calls, nothing crazy, but anyway this one is climbing up to the 500k range and could go beyond 👀
People complaining about Grok diving to 30M... meanwhile we've been here the whole time 😎 Anyway it's on to the next play/meta/whatever.
👍1
(Answer btw because it was a crazy risky gamble, until it wasn't) 1.5M now, sure why not
WE WATCHED GROK AI FROM 20K DIP TO 900K HOW DID WE NOT CALL THIS 🤣🤣
🤣1
Update on what's going on here. We were close to calling 2 utility projects for a 3-4x each. One looked sketchy for a bit, one our entry target wasn't hit. Nothing crazy as far as misses go. Some mooners have been launched late at night or overnight sadly... so misses there. There haven't been calls much here but it's for some of the reasons above. And we're working on adjustments personally. Patience still requi…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TweetBird_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 765,225 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TweetBird Official” (@TweetBird_Official), 368 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TweetBird_Official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.