Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

İstanbul (A1) جلسه اول

@Turk_DiL1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,369subscribers

+730 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001386914629
TypeChannel
Username@Turk_DiL1
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Turk_DiL1

Growth

9,63510,36910,0026 August 2026 — 9,639 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,639 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,645 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,635 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,369 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +730. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,525–10,479 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:2310,369+734
10 Aug 2026, 08:419,635-10
7 Aug 2026, 15:239,645+6
6 Aug 2026, 20:459,639no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:399,639first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 June 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.3%
avg views ÷ 10,369 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,180
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 June 202212 August 2026)
Views total2,350
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 00:02 UTC610 viewsread 12 August 2026

تخفیف طلاییمون رو از دست ندید دوستان

10 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC≈1,740 viewsread 12 August 2026

کلاسامون 50 درصد تخفیف خورده جهت اطلاع از شرایط پیام بدید @Turkdilebadi1

23 Aug 2024, 06:19 UTC≈60,100 viewsread 12 August 2026

برای شرکت در جلسات و درس های بعدی، کلمه ی #استانبول رو به پی وی استاد ارسال کنید 🆔 @Turkdilebadi1 🇹🇷 ظرفیت بسیار محدود ✅

9 Jun 2022, 19:36 UTC≈140,000 viewsread 12 August 2026

درس اول به اتمام رسید ✅ ممنونم از همه ی دوستانی که در این جلسه شرکت کردن 🙏 برای شرکت در جلسات و درس های بعدی، کلمه ی #استانبول رو به پی وی استاد ارسال کنید 🆔 @Turkdilebadi1 🇹🇷 ظرفیت بسیار محدود ✅

9 Jun 2022, 19:28 UTC≈128,000 viewsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

9 Jun 2022, 19:27 UTC≈75,100 viewsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

توضیحات کامل صفحه 18 Burası Çin Burası Rusya Buradı İtalya Burası Mısır Burası Amerika

9 Jun 2022, 19:27 UTC≈122,000 viewsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

تمرینات مهم ✅ حتما در پی وی ارسال کنید

9 Jun 2022, 19:22 UTC≈62,100 viewsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

توضیحات کامل صفحه 17 تمرین دارد ✅ پاسخ نوشتاری‌ تمرین 8 Burasi Eyfel külesi Burası büyük ve çok güzel Burası İngiltere Burası büyük ve çok güzel Burası Mısır piramitleri Burası sıcak ve tarihi

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Turk_DiL1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 14,218 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“İstanbul (A1) جلسه اول” (@Turk_DiL1), 10,369 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Turk_DiL1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.