Channel
@Tuidan52
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,916subscribers
-104 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003973696161 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Tuidan52 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 23 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Tuidan52 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 1,916 | -98 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 2,014 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 2,020 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 2,020 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 June 2026 – 14 July 2026) |
| Views total | 91 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
世界杯初盘推荐 —————————————-- 法国 vs 西班牙 07/15 03:00 推荐：西班牙胜 全场：大 2.5 让球：西班牙 +0/0.5 角球：大9 比分：2-2 2-3 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考 182体育2026世界杯指定投注平台 签到活动、首存活动、日存活动（每日存款每日送） 体育、电子、百家乐、棋牌等周流水活动 😘专属VIP客服： @Svip182ty6 😘双向用户点击： @Svip182ty6_Bot 😁😊😁😁： 1821062.com
南澳大利亚州联赛 —————————————-- 阿德莱德蓝鹰 vs 莫德柏里喷射机 南澳大利亚州联赛 07/13 18:00 让球[欧洲盘] 阿德莱德蓝鹰 0@1.81 —————————————-- 澳大利亚维多利亚州超级联赛 1 —————————————-- 布琳狮子 vs 布伦瑞克城 澳大利亚维多利亚州超级联赛 1 07/13 18:30 大/小[欧洲盘] 大 3.5@1.92 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考 182体育2026世界杯指定投注平台 签到活动、首存活动、日存活动（每日存款每日送） 体育、电子、百家乐、棋牌等周流水活动 😘专属VIP客服： @Svip182ty6 😘双向用户点击： @Svip182ty6_Bot 😁😊😁😁： 1821062.com
韩国乙级联赛 —————————————-- 釜山偶像 vs 金浦FC 韩国乙级联赛 07/12 18:30 让球[欧洲盘] 釜山偶像 0@1.80 —————————————-- 忠南牙山 vs 庆南FC 韩国乙级联赛 07/12 18:30 让球[欧洲盘] 忠南牙山 -0/0.5@1.88 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
中国甲级联赛 —————————————-- 深圳青年人 vs 定南赣联足球俱乐部 中国甲级联赛 07/12 19:00 让球[欧洲盘] 深圳青年人 -0.5@1.80 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
韩国K1联赛 —————————————-- 仁川联 vs 安养FC 韩国K1联赛 07/12 18:30 让球[欧洲盘] 仁川联 -0.5@2.08 —————————————-- 济州联队 vs 大田韩亚市民 韩国K1联赛 07/12 18:30 让球[欧洲盘] 济州联队 +0/0.5@1.81 —————————————-- 首尔FC vs 江原FC 韩国K1联赛 07/12 18:30 大/小[欧洲盘] 大 2@1.88 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
世界杯初盘推荐 —————————————-- 西班牙 vs 比利时 07/11 03:00 推荐：西班牙胜 全场：大 2.5/3 让球：西班牙 -1 角球：大9.5 比分：2-1 3-1 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考 182体育2026世界杯指定投注平台 签到活动、首存活动、日存活动（每日存款每日送） 体育、电子、百家乐、棋牌等周流水活动 😘专属VIP客服： @Svip182ty6 😘双向用户点击： @Svip182ty6_Bot 😁😊😁😁： 1821062.com
世界杯初盘推荐 —————————————-- 法国 vs 摩洛哥 07/10 04:00 推荐：法国胜 全场：大 2.5 让球：法国 -1 角球：小10 比分：2-1 3-2 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考 182体育2026世界杯指定投注平台 签到活动、首存活动、日存活动（每日存款每日送） 体育、电子、百家乐、棋牌等周流水活动 😘专属VIP客服： @Svip182ty6 😘双向用户点击： @Svip182ty6_Bot 😁😊😁😁： 1821062.com
❤1
世界杯初盘推荐 —————————————-- 巴西 vs 挪威 07/06 04:00 推荐：平局 全场：大 2.5/3 让球：挪威 +0.5/1 角球：大 9.5 比分：2-1 2-2 墨西哥 vs 英格兰 07/06 08:00 推荐：英格兰胜 全场：大 2/2.5 让球：英格兰 -0/0.5 角球：大 8.5 比分：1-2 1-3 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考 182体育2026世界杯指定投注平台 签到活动、首存活动、日存活动（每日存款每日送） 体育、电子、百家乐、棋牌等周流水活动 😘专属VIP客服： @Svip182ty6 😘双向用户点击： @Svip182ty6_Bot 😁😊😁😁： 1821062.com
❤1
世界杯初盘推荐 —————————————-- 加拿大 vs 摩洛哥 07/05 01:00 推荐：摩洛哥胜 全场：大2/2.5 让球：摩洛哥 -0.5/1 角球：大8.5 比分：1-2 1-3 巴拉圭 vs 法国 07/05 05:00 推荐：法国胜 全场：大3 让球：法国 -1.5/2 角球：大9.5 比分：1-3 2-4 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考 182体育2026世界杯指定投注平台 签到活动、首存活动、日存活动（每日存款每日送） 体育、电子、百家乐、棋牌等周流水活动 😘专属VIP客服： @Svip182ty6 😘双向用户点击： @Svip182ty6_Bot 😁😊😁😁： 1821062.com
世界杯初盘推荐 —————————————-- 澳大利亚 vs 埃及 07/04 02:00 推荐：平局 全场：小2 让球：澳大利亚 +0/0.5 角球：大8.5 比分：0-0 1-1 阿根廷 vs 佛得角 07/04 06:00 推荐：阿根廷胜 全场：小3 让球：佛得角 +2/2.5 角球：小8.5 比分：2-0 3-0 哥伦比亚 vs 加纳 07/04 09:30 推荐：哥伦比亚胜 全场：大2/2.5 让球：哥伦比亚 -1/1.5 角球：大8.5 比分：2-1 3-1 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考 182体育2026世界杯指定投注平台 签到活动、首存活动、日存活动（每日存款每日送） 体育、电子、百家乐、棋牌等周流水活动 😘专属VIP客服： @Svip182ty6 😘双向用户点击： @Svip182ty6_Bot 😁😊😁😁： 1821062.com
世界杯初盘推荐 —————————————-- 西班牙 vs 奥地利 07/03 03:00 推荐：西班牙胜 全场：大2.5/3 让球：西班牙 -1.5/2 角球：大9.5 比分：3-0 3-1 葡萄牙 vs 克罗地亚 07/03 07:00 推荐：葡萄牙胜 全场：大2.5/3 让球：葡萄牙 -0.5/1 角球：大9 比分：2-1 3-1 瑞士 vs 阿尔及利亚 07/03 11:00 推荐：瑞士胜 全场：小2/2.5 让球：瑞士 -0.5 角球：小9 比分：1-0 1-1 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考 182体育2026世界杯指定投注平台 签到活动、首存活动、日存活动（每日存款每日送） 体育、电子、百家乐、棋牌等周流水活动 😘专属VIP客服： @Svip182ty6 😘双向用户点击： @Svip182ty6_Bot 😁😊😁😁： 1821062.co
世界杯初盘推荐 —————————————-- 英格兰 vs 刚果民主共和国 07/02 00:00 推荐：英格兰胜 全场：大2.5 让球：英格兰 -1.5 角球：大9.5 比分：3-0 3-1 比利时 vs 塞内加尔 07/02 04:00 推荐：比利时胜 全场：小2.5 让球：比利时 -0/0.5 角球：小9.5 比分：1-0 1-1 美国 vs 波黑 07/02 08:00 推荐：美国胜 全场：大2.5/3 让球：美国 -1/1.5 角球：大9.5 比分：3-0 3-1 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考 182体育2026世界杯指定投注平台 签到活动、首存活动、日存活动（每日存款每日送） 体育、电子、百家乐、棋牌等周流水活动 😘专属VIP客服： @Svip182ty6 😘双向用户点击： @Svip182ty6_Bot 😁😊😁😁： 1821062
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Tuidan52. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 999,846 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“182体育精准体育推单、足球、NBA、、世界杯” (@Tuidan52), 1,916 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tuidan52.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.