Channel
@Trustedones
On this record: Topic Β· Observations Β· Also posting the same content Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
225subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002102715961 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Trustedones |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Trustedones |
Ecommerce storefront β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 5 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramβs forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Trustedones/221 Β· this entry6 Aug 2024, 07:00 UTC | @FARMINGOFAIRDROPS/136 Aug 2024, 07:00 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Trustedones/236 Β· this entry14 Sept 2024, 04:06 UTC | @FARMINGOFAIRDROPS/3414 Sept 2024, 04:06 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Trustedones/237 Β· this entry17 Sept 2024, 19:49 UTC | @FARMINGOFAIRDROPS/3617 Sept 2024, 19:49 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @SANIYA_TOOL/26620 Jul 2024, 06:58 UTC | @Trustedones/215 Β· this entry20 Jul 2024, 07:01 UTC | 1.00 | 3 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @FARMINGOFAIRDROPS | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (5β1) |
| @SANIYA_TOOL | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @SANIYA_TOOL (6β0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp β in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
βPublished firstβ means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 20 July 2024 to 29 November 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detectorβs own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @SANIYA_TOOL. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy Β· clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through β we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channelβs posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable β 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times β 60%, no better than a coin flip β because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channelβs history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying β a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story β and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 225 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 226 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 226 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 June 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
7 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 5 | 71.4% | |
| β€ | 1 | 14.3% | |
| π | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2024 to 29 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Selling this in just 30/inr Dm on @SANIYAxTG
β€1
Suggest Me A Telegram Rare Username And Get A Telegram Channel For Free Channel link:- https://t.me/Trustedones Send Usernames Here @SANIYAxTG
π1
Those who want to sell your hamsator coin dm on @SANIYAxTG
Now Officially Confirmed β #MonoBix Binance Mini Game π JOIN Here https://t.me/Binance_Moonbix_bot/start?startapp=ref_6187744465&startApp=ref_6187744465 ο»Ώ
https://t.me/SANIYA_TOOL {500} https://t.me/+cHYUZ6q4gYNmYWQ1 {500} Both channel available for sell 500/inr take instant
Binance labs Invested Telegram Projects π₯° Blum - Join Now Side Kick - Join Now
http://t.me/catsgang_bot/join?startapp=c9bVgRuWqdu9kgbi5AHXY Start this bot and dm on @SANIYAxTG AND GET 1000 FRE FOLLOWERS
Any One Who Need There Own Bot Like This For Free YOUR CHANNEL MUST HAVE 1K MEMBER MINIMUM Dm on @SANIYAxTG
πINSTAGRAM FOLLOWERSπ π½Availableπ½ 1k - 22rs {Lifetime Refill}β 10k - 210rs {Lifetime Refill}β 50k - 1000rs {Lifetime Refill}β 100k - 1940rs {Lifetime Refill}β Dm on @SANIYAxTG π
πINSTAGRAM FOLLOWERSπ π½Availableπ½ 60k - 1100rs {Lifetime Refill}β Dm on @SANIYAxTG π
https://t.me/Trustedones https://t.me/+5uOpHuF78Qo2Y2Jl https://t.me/BRANCH_xTG https://t.me/SANIYA_TOOL https://t.me/SANIYA_TOOLS https://t.me/+T7TxCCmk12IyZDJl https://t.me/+cHYUZ6q4gYNmYWQ1 These all channels are available for sell in cheap because leaving the telegram Dm on @SANIYAxTG TO BUY
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Trustedones. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 534,904 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Trustedones named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππππππ'π πππππΈβ (@Trustedones), 225 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Trustedones.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.