Channel
@TrendingVzla
On this record: Topic Β· Observations Β· Also posting the same content Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
5,207subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001343764998 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TrendingVzla |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TrendingVzla |
Memes & entertainment β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramβs forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @TrendingVzla/26899 Β· this entry18 Sept 2025, 00:53 UTC | @frasesitaas/810718 Sept 2025, 02:01 UTC | 1.00 | 68 minutes |
| @TrendingVzla/26902 Β· this entry21 Sept 2025, 00:06 UTC | @frasesitaas/811021 Sept 2025, 02:09 UTC | 1.00 | 2.0 hours |
| @TrendingVzla/26903 Β· this entry22 Sept 2025, 00:06 UTC | @frasesitaas/811122 Sept 2025, 02:07 UTC | 1.00 | 2.0 hours |
| @TrendingVzla/26904 Β· this entry5 Oct 2025, 00:03 UTC | @frasesitaas/81125 Oct 2025, 02:04 UTC | 1.00 | 2.0 hours |
| @TrendingVzla/26905 Β· this entry6 Oct 2025, 00:02 UTC | @frasesitaas/81136 Oct 2025, 02:00 UTC | 1.00 | 2.0 hours |
| @TrendingVzla/26907 Β· this entry8 Oct 2025, 00:05 UTC | @frasesitaas/81158 Oct 2025, 02:03 UTC | 1.00 | 2.0 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @frasesitaas | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2.0 hours | this entry (8β1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp β in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
βPublished firstβ means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 13 September 2025 to 22 October 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detectorβs own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @TrendingVzla β which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through β we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channelβs posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable β 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times β 60%, no better than a coin flip β because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channelβs history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying β a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story β and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 5,207 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 5,213 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 5,224 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 5,227 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 September 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
πΈπ ππΜπ ππ π’πππ£πππ π ππ’πππ’π π‘ππππ ππ ππππ‘πππ π£πππΜπ πππππ’π π‘ππππ ππ ππππ ππππ πππππ ππ π π’ππΜππ -πΆβπππππ π΅π’πππ€π πππ₯
Signed JP
πππ¦ π’π π πππππ ππππππππ‘π, ΒΏπππ ππ’πΜ π‘ππππππππ π‘πππ π‘ππ ππ π ππππ?[π·ππ ππ’πΜπ ππ ππ’π π π’ πππππ ππ ππππ ππ’π π π βπ’πππππ π πππππ ππ’π πππ π π ππ π‘ππ πππππππ§ βπ’πππππ πππππ‘πππ -πΈπππ πΆππππππ₯
Signed JP
πΏπ πππππππππ ππ ππ₯ππ π‘π. πΏπ π’Μππππ ππ’π ππ₯ππ π‘π, ππ ππ πππ ππ ππ π ππ πππππ§ -π΄πππΜπ πΆπ»πΈπ½πππ₯
Signed JP
πΈπ βπππππ π π ππ ππππ£ππ§π πππ ππ ππ’ππ π¦ πππ π£ππππππππ π¦ πππ£πππ ππ’π ππ πππππππππ ππ π‘πΜ ππ πππ πππ ππ π ππππππππ ππ ππ π£πππ -πΆπππ£πππ‘ππ π₯
Signed JP
ππ πππ’πππ ππ ππ πππ ππ π£πππ ππππ ππ πππ ππΜπΜ π π£ππ£πππππ₯
Signed JP
πππ ππ’πππ πππ ππ ππ’π ππ π‘ππππ. πππ πππππππ, π’ππ ππππ πππ ππ’πππ πππ πππππππππ π¦ ππ π ππ πππππ§; ππ’πππ πππ πππππ π¦ ππ ππ π‘ππ ππ‘ππππππ. π ππ’πππ πππ π πππππ’ππΜπ π¦ ππ π‘ππππππ. ππππ ππ π‘ππ πππ π‘πππππ π ππ ππ ππ’πππ -π½ππππ πΏπ’ππ π΅πππππ π₯
Signed JP
πΏππ πππππππππ ππ’πππ π π ππππππ ππππ πππ π πππ’ππππππ π‘πππππππ₯
Signed JP
ππ πππππ, ππ’πππ π ππ ππ πππ§πΜπ ππ ππ πππ π ππ ππππ’πππ. ππππ ππ πππ π, ππππΜπ ππππ π ππ ππ πππ§πΜπ πππ πππππ ππ ππππ’πππ -πΆβπππππ πΆβππππππ₯
Signed JP
πππ π‘ππππ ππ’π ππππππππ π ππ πππ ππππππ ππππππππ‘πππππ‘π π π’π ππππ’ππ π, π πππ π ππππ‘πππππ πππ πππ π‘πππ‘ππ ππ’π ππβππππ π πππππ π‘πππππππ π πππ πππ ππ -πΉπππππππβ ππππ‘π§πβππ₯
Signed JP
ππ ππ’ππππ ππππ ππππ πππππ‘π ππππ πππβπ, ππππ ππ πππππ πππ£ππππ‘π, ππ’ππππ πππππ‘π, ππΜπππ π‘πππ ππΜπππ, πππ‘ππ πππ πππ‘ππ...ππ πππππ πππ ππ πππππ -πππππ π΅ππππππ‘π‘ππ₯
Signed JP
ππ ππ πππππ ππππ πππππππ ππππ βππππ πππΜπ. -πππ πππππππ, ππ’πππ. -πΈπ π πππππππ, ππ’πππ. -πππ π‘ππππππΜπ, ππ’πππ. -πΈπ πππ ππππππ, ππ’πππ. -πΏπ ππππππππππππ, ππ’ππππ₯
Signed JP
π΄πππ’πππ πππππ πππππ ππππ ππππππ, ππ π‘πππππ π£π’πππ‘π ππ‘ππΜπ -ππππππ‘ π΅πππππππ‘ππ₯
Signed JP
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TrendingVzla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 1,118,592 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ»ππππ ππππ³.β (@TrendingVzla), 5,207 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TrendingVzla.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.