Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TranSOnly / TS0

@Trans0nly

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

265subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003067480059
TypeChannel
Username@Trans0nly
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Trans0nly

Growth

265266265.59 Aug 2026, 06:16 — 266 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 02:41 — 265 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 06:1610 Aug 2026, 02:41
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 265–266 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 02:41265-1
9 Aug 2026, 06:16266first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 265 subscribers
Avg views / post
55.9
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held17 (8 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total950
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 15s
Average length
2m 05s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC39 viewsread 9 August 2026

我妈告诉我要在老家多待两天但我没带那么多药,于是让我妈去帮我买药 妈:你啥药没了 我:雌二醇 妈:要买啥 我:补佳乐 妈:行,我去看看 我:有空顺便把srs定金转账了 妈:哎呀知道了,你莫慌嘛 https://x.com/i/status/2085931810316530040

9 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC31 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

两个男生居家Daily vlog @宇七的吴老哥: 发布视频 播放量:8132 弹幕:5 评论:31 点赞:625 投币:18 收藏:122 转发:43 发布日期:2026-08-05 11:00:00 上传日期:2026-08-05 09:38:13

9 Aug 2026, 02:19 UTC31 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

蓄发过程中,你会经历什么?需要怎样的心理准备? 本视频讲述一些留长发过程的通用情况,每个人经历会有细微差别,不会完全与视频一致,但可以帮你做好一些心理准备。 @长发人民张: 发布视频 播放量:2.17万 弹幕:33 评论:217 点赞:1187 投币:59 收藏:856 转发:70 发布日期:2026-07-27 12:26:00 上传日期:2026-07-27 10:21:00

8 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC45 viewsread 9 August 2026

见过一个水门做的然后下体全烂掉,给笔者留下了极大的心理阴影。

8 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC45 viewsread 9 August 2026

为什么会觉得Yanhee和kamol比PAI好,不知道这个视频谁做的。总之我觉得兼听则明,多比选几家,自己打电话问问交流接触一下,自己判断比较好。当然水门除非实在缺钱还特别一定要手术的别去。

8 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC62 viewsread 9 August 2026

建议以后还是不要用写 pdf 挂人的方法。人家真的有点问题什么的。更重要的是我们要普及和具体的人无关的,关于社交礼仪、规范、同意、性病防治等的相关知识。具体的人嘛,处不来就踢了就行,发生纠纷了就走法律上更有效的渠道解决。这是我的一点想法。当然,如果因为踢了被对方反过来挂,那这属于对方不行。

8 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC58 viewsread 9 August 2026

我对 astrioia 的评价是:看了 lmy 所写的报告,我觉得我会很愿意跟此人线下吃顿饭什么的,觉得应该能处,不糟糕。但是看此人平时的网络发言抽象程度,确实不想把 ta 放进我管理的人和群里。两个不矛盾。

8 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC68 viewsread 9 August 2026

中文翻译 关于 陆 的那份 PDF,我,Yonah Jeremiah Patrick CIBANI,可以予以确认。 此外,YJPC 希望这会是最后一份 PDF。PDF 帮不了任何人。 YJPC 相信并支持正当程序(due process)。她希望所有争议都能够以友好且有尊严的方式解决。若实在别无选择,则应诉诸司法体系——无论是非公开审理(in camera)还是公开审理——而不是进行有失体面的互相撕咬。

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Trans0nly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 267,377 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TranSOnly / TS0” (@Trans0nly), 265 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Trans0nly.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.