Trading Busters Premium Signals pinned a photo
Channel
Trading Busters Premium Signals
@TradingBustersX
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
348subscribers
+23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001917776493 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TradingBustersX |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 26 June 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TradingBustersX |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 348 | +2 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 06:41 | 346 | +9 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 337 | +7 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 330 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 332 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 331 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 327 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:19 | 326 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 326 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 325 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
29 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 55.2% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 31.0% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 13.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2023 to 23 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
You still want to try TRADING BUSTERS? Another losing day on their method
😱4👍3❤2
Signed S3P
Channel name was changed to «Trading Busters Premium Signals»
Trading Busters Premium Signals pinned a photo
Another day, another lose on order 2. You fucking idiot, "SMALL LOSE" is 95% of wallet balance ! 100% lost on order 1 95% lost on order 2 —- Example. If your order 1 you lost 500$, on order 2 you lost 4750$ (95%) They are fucking scammers ! You will pay the monthly subscription and you will win 1% of amount you invested!... When it's a losing day, you will lose ALL OF YOUR BALANCE. If you have 10.000$ you can earn …
❤13👍3
Signed S3P
Trading Busters Premium Signals pinned a photo
See here that they are fuccking scammers !
Signed M3P
Trading Busters Premium Signals pinned «3 losing days in 5 trading days ! TRADING BUSTERS IS SCAM !»
3 losing days in 5 trading days ! TRADING BUSTERS IS SCAM !
Signed M3P
I wait from you photos of how much you lost today.
Signed Moo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Moo
Another losing day on order 2! INCA O ZI CU PIERDERE PE ORDER 2. !
Signed Moo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TradingBustersX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trading Busters Premium Signals” (@TradingBustersX), 348 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TradingBustersX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.