Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 61 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 509–559 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Oct 2026, 13:21
553
+8
27 Sept 2026, 06:16
545
+5
29 Aug 2026, 10:28
540
+4
22 Aug 2026, 00:39
536
+18
15 Aug 2026, 06:08
518
+3
8 Aug 2026, 04:04
515
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:28
515
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
261 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
214
82.0%
custom 5168180717607191003
20
7.66%
🤝
12
4.60%
💯
7
2.68%
custom 5165875668788970079
3
1.15%
custom 5366329012333357848
2
0.766%
custom 5168023689307881851
1
0.383%
custom 5168355222128427844
1
0.383%
custom 5366599810021366102
1
0.383%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 19 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Trader_artemev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#IRUS #РФ 🇷🇺
Чего я жду от текущего роста РФ? 🫵
Сейчас я имею два торговых плана.
Изначально было их три, но сегодняшний ожидаемый старт роста доллара к рублю, напомнил мне об инфляции и рисках рубля. По этому третья стратегия купил и держи три года лежит в сторонке пока и вероятность ее использовать 5% примерно. И измениться что-то может только в случае внезапного погружения к недавним минимумам.
То что я рассма…
#LKOH
Как то недавно давно, кажется 9 апреля 25 был пост в ТВ
Собственно 3800 не дали потрогать, но к 3952 сходили.
Я это к чему, верьте графику!
Когда я делал этот анализ, сидел и думал, да ну ты "гонишь"
Лукоил на 3800?!
С этими мыслями и оформил свой сетап. Теперь рефлексирую на результат и Вам даю такую возможность 😲
И да, кто еще не со мной в ТВ, ниже ссылка, подписывайтесь, мне приятно, а Вам мои сетапы …
#Трейдинг #легенда
⚫️ Ушел из жизни Виктор Недейхофер.
Сегодня финансовый мир потерял одного из самых выдающихся и одновременно самых противоречивых трейдеров современности.
Виктор Недейхофер — легенда Уолл-стрит, статистик, чемпион США по сквошу, партнер Джорджа Сороса и человек, который оказал огромное влияние на развитие количественного подхода к торговле.
Он стал одним из первых, кто начал искать на рынке не …
#CHMF #Северсталь 🇷🇺
Купил в портфель по 660руб.
Взял немного, но уже сейчас цена весьма вкусная!
К тому же мы находимся у исторической поддержки.
Кто подписан на меня в Т инвестициях, тому пришел сигнал о покупке 🙂
https://www.tradingview.com/x/PQOAtquk/
#IRUS 🇷🇺
Тем временем индекс Мосбиржи как я и предполагал вернулся за наклонную и сильный уровень 2200 на месяце!
На мой взгляд это очень позитивный сигнал для рынка.
Сейчас ждем формирования разворота и возможно еще раз задернут месячную свечу августа к 2000 для набора позиций.
Помните, крупный игрок не покупает одним приказом, для него это делает пул брокеров и малыми долями по заведомо оговоренным диапазонам ц…
#РФ #Ликвидность #Рубль
Сейчас многие пересылают пост о том, что Сбер и ВТБ якобы испытывают острую нехватку рублей, а ЦБ отказывается помогать. Разобрал ситуацию.
📌 Что вижу я.
Да, напряжение с рублевой ликвидностью действительно есть. Это факт. Но пока это не банковский кризис.
Основные причины:
• крупные дивидендные выплаты;
• переход банковской системы к структурному дефициту ликвидности;
• активные размещени…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Trader_artemev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Панель Приборов FTT @Ta_ftt · 28,193 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𓃒 𝕋ℝ𝔸𝔻𝔼ℝ 𝔸ℝ𝕋𝔼𝕄𝔼𝕍” (@Trader_artemev), 553 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Trader_artemev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.