As someone who leverages both Claude Code and Codex (with a preference towards Codex) - theres a plethora of info, blogs, videos, newsletters geared around Claude Code but not so much Codex. Why....? Groks reply... FWIW both are fab and I run both simulatanously https://t.co/f3T0p2CD0m — XO (@Trader_XO) Feb 8, 2026

Channel
TraderXO
@Trader_XO
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
327subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001256397758 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Trader_XO |
| Description | This is the official channel of Trader_XO Price & Market Rhythm | Product Partner @OKX Full-time Trader - @pandilladeflujo Bitcoin - Commodities - Equities - FX - Indices |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Trader_XO |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 327 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 327 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3
- Links
- ≈9,870
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Just wanted to give a shout-out to a good trader friend. @tradermatt He used to be active on X during 2017–2019 with quality trading content and takes before taking a long hiatus. He's consistently called major moves and trades, particularly on the way down with a no bs — XO (@Trader_XO) Feb 5, 2026
https://t.co/noVCKR6q91 — XO (@Trader_XO) Feb 5, 2026
Absolutely love this Competition is healthy Another weekend of playing around! https://t.co/YL0Gb4tiNN — XO (@Trader_XO) Feb 5, 2026
The move towards to the 200 weekly ma shouldn’t come as a surprise The pace at which it could get there is what will surprise most… Let’s see But if you know you know 50/200/300 weekly MAs https://t.co/eC0DwrtyXd — XO (@Trader_XO) Feb 5, 2026
$BTC Sweet Science... How did we do? https://t.co/CyeAIpSSao https://t.co/iY7XUJzoAQ — XO (@Trader_XO) Feb 5, 2026
All in on codex .... https://t.co/UCePgKB0Ph — XO (@Trader_XO) Feb 4, 2026
$ETH Sorry what was that again? blue line? I'd like to think were close to significant enough low around here for a mean reversion into the daily bands. Cheers https://t.co/Bu0D4tX2GK https://t.co/tD6TluCzkB — XO (@Trader_XO) Feb 2, 2026
I'd hope to see some sharp bounces on silver and gold into next week... all on low volume... If so, thats something I'd be very interested in selling. Meanwhile NQ - still feels distributive to me. ES fails once again to find acceptance above 7000 on the monthly close. https://t.co/HbsJTfG4qL https://t.co/0iDl3unY9T — XO (@Trader_XO) Feb 1, 2026
$BTC This is by far my favourite higher-timeframe Bitcoin strategy, particularly for avoiding downside risk, or in my case, systematically taking advantage of it. I have outlined expectations in the previous tweet below - and once it again it appears to be playing out thus https://t.co/8HrJAUz4Ki https://t.co/2rqoTs0xp6 — XO (@Trader_XO) Feb 1, 2026
A fairly quiet month with most of my attention on AI / Coding over the last several weeks. Took fewer trades (3 in total during Jan) as planned with the transition back towards higher time frame swings 4th profitable month in a row since starting this back in October - https://t.co/1wYftdXQYi https://t.co/KStgOgY1cR — XO (@Trader_XO) Feb 1, 2026
Some lovely pain.... https://t.co/qYP9Lz6E7H https://t.co/7vozna98fN — XO (@Trader_XO) Jan 31, 2026
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Trader_XO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Trader_XO named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TraderXO” (@Trader_XO), 327 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Trader_XO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.