Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

International Traders

@TraderInternational

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

56subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001070591006
TypeChannel
Username@TraderInternational
DescriptionPrice Action Concepts Only post my analysis and content. Admin: @INTLtraderadmin
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/TraderInternational

Growth

567 August 2026 — 56 subscribers10 August 2026 — 56 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55–57 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 07:3156no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:2156first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 March 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
57
Links
79

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

25 Mar 2021, 18:18 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ETHUSD IMO this dip is for buying we are good as long as we are above Monthly Open.

23 Mar 2021, 16:02 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Coinbase pro whales started again. Last time we made a new ATH after several big outflows. @TraderInternational

21 Mar 2021, 10:46 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

BATBTC Expecting at least 50% bounce from this level. @TraderInternational

20 Mar 2021, 20:19 UTC721 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

SXPUSDT 5$ is inevitable! expecting a dip and after that a bit of consolidation before takeoff @TraderInternational

17 Mar 2021, 18:20 UTC533 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

EOSUSDT after flipping the 3D S/R, imo it's time for EOS to shine. clear targets on the chart, Let's see what happens next! @TraderInternational

17 Mar 2021, 09:22 UTC444 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

AVAXBTC +12% so far Price is going to where the majority of liquidity pool is.

16 Mar 2021, 15:20 UTC408 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

CRVBTC strong move IMO I longed it with a very small amount of money, I'll add if we get a dip before the real pump! @TraderInternational

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TraderInternational. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Mar 2021, 09:48 UTCAnonymous Poll60 voters

Short term BTC market sentiment:

  1. I am bullish40%
  2. I am bearish28%
  3. Show results32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2021 to 30 March 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 544,452 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“International Traders” (@TraderInternational), 56 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TraderInternational.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.