Channel
@Tradeops_xyz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
282subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002232304223 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Tradeops_xyz |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Tradeops_xyz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 282 | +16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 266 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 266 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,467 |
| Reactions total | 46 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
46 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 60.9% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 39.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پس چرا Max Pain وبملت رو به سمت ۱٬۱۵۴ نکشید؟ چون خود Max Pain هیچ سفارش خرید یا فروشی وارد بازار نمیکنه. این عدد نقدینگی جابهجا نمیکنه و نمیتونه عرضه و تقاضای بازار نقدی رو مجبور به حرکت کنه. ممکنه بعضی فروشندگان اختیار از نزدیکشدن قیمت سهم به محدودهٔ خاصی نفع ببرن، اما قراردادهای باز بهمون نمیگن این معاملهگرها بدون پوشش ریسک موندن، موقعیت ترکیبی دارن یا اصلاً توان اثرگذاری روی قیمت سهم رو دارن یا نه. ضمن ا…
👍2
Signed Ali
اگر Max Pain آهنربای قیمته، چرا وبملت ۱۳۵ ریال بالاتر از اون بسته شد؟ 📊 نبض پایانی بازار آپشن | ۲۰ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ امروز آخرین روز معاملاتی طملت و ضملتهای برج ۵ بود. وبملت در بازار نقدی روی ۱٬۲۸۹ ریال بسته شد، اما Max Pain نهایی سررسید مرداد روی ۱٬۱۵۴ ریال قرار داشت؛ یعنی ۱۳۵ ریال پایینتر از قیمت پایانی سهم. اگه Max Pain رو «قیمتی که سهم باید تا سررسید به اون برسه» بدونیم، اتفاق امروز عجیب به نظر میرسه. اما مسئله از…
❤2👍1
Signed Ali
نمودار Max Pain سهم وبملت منبع: نبض بازار تریداپس
Signed Ali
پس در بسیاری از اختیارخریدها، افت نوسان ضمنی همراه با کمشدن زمان، از اثر مثبت رشد اهرم قویتر شد. در اختیارفروشها هم افزایش نوسان ضمنی تونست اثر منفی رشد دارایی پایه رو جبران کنه. افزایش نوسان ضمنی اختیارفروشها با افت نوسانسنج تناقضی نداره؛ چون ۷۵٪ وزن محاسبه نوسان این سررسید از اختیارخریدها اومده و افت اونها بهمراتب بزرگتر بوده. این رفتار رو نشونه قطعی نزولیشدن بازار نمیدونیم. چیزی که با اطمینان بیشتری می…
👍5
Signed Ali
اهرم سبز بود، چرا اختیارخریدها قرمز شدن؟ 📊 نبض پایانی بازار آپشن | ۱۸ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ امروز هر ۲۲ دارایی پایه مثبت بودن، اما نقشه بازار آپشن تصویر متفاوتی داشت: بخش بزرگی از اختیارخریدها قرمز بودن و اختیارفروشها بیشتر به رنگ سبز دیده میشدن. اهرم واضحترین نمونه بود. قیمت پایانی اهرم با رشد ۳٫۷۱٪ به ۴۸٬۵۲۷ رسید، اما اختیارخریدهای با ارزش معاملاتی زیاد اون افت کردن؛ درحالیکه اختیارفروشهای متناظر رشد قابلتوجهی داشتن.…
👍1
Signed Ali
نقشه بازار آپشن 18 مرداد 1405 منبع: نبض بازار تریداپس
Signed Ali
جمعبندی تریداپس: بازار امروز فقط روی تابلو صعودی نبود؛ حجم معاملات، رشد موقعیتهای و ساختار نوسان هم نشون میداد که سناریوی صعودی جدیتر وارد قیمتها شده. در سررسیدهای خیلی نزدیک، کاهش موقعیت باز بیشتر از سازوکار هفتهٔ آخر، نزدیکشدن به اعمال و قفلشدن نقدینگی میاد؛ بنابراین اون رو نشونهٔ تغییر جهت بازار نمیدونیم. موقعیتهای تازه بیشتر در سررسیدهای چند هفتهای ساخته شدن؛ یعنی معاملهگرها برای سناریوی اصلی بازار، …
👍5
Signed Ali
📊 نبض پایانی بازار آپشن | ۱۷ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ تابلوی امروز جهت بازار رو روشن کرده بود: هر ۲۲ دارایی پایه مثبت بودن و اختیارخریدها بازار رو در اختیار داشتند. سؤال مهمتر این بود که این صعود کجا به موقعیت تازه تبدیل شد؛ جواب: چند نماد و سررسید مشخص. 🔹 این بار حجم و موقعیتهای باز همجهت شدن اختیارهای خرید حدود ۸۴٪ حجم و نزدیک ۹۴٪ ارزش معاملات رو داشتند. موقعیتهای باز کل بازار ۱۷٫۶۴ میلیون قرارداد بیشتر شد؛ ۱۱٫۹۷ میلیون د…
👍3
Signed Ali
نمای مقایسهای نوسان ضمنی و تاریخی نبض بازار تریداپس
Signed Ali
📂 پرونده تریداپس | شماره ۲ پنجشنبهست و بازار تعطیله؛ فرصت خوبیه که با خیال راحت سراغ موضوعی بریم که توی نظرسنجی، خودتون انتخابش کردید: آیا نوسان ضمنی (IV) بالا یعنی قرارداد گرونه؟ جواب کوتاه؟ نه، لزوماً. وقتی توی زنجیره اختیار دو قرارداد میبینیم که IV یکی ۵۰٪ و اون یکی ۹۰٪ه، خیلی راحت ممکنه دومی رو «گرونتر» بدونیم. اما IV برچسب قیمت نیست؛ ترجمهٔ قیمت آپشن به زبان نوسانه. مدل قیمتگذاری، قیمت قرارداد، قیمت …
👍7
📊 نبض پایانی بازار آپشن | ۱۴ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ بازار امروز سناریوی کاهش تنش رو قیمتگذاری کرد؛ نه توافق قطعی رو. در فضای خبرهای مثبت از پیشرفت گفتوگوهای ایران و عمان و گمانهزنی دربارهٔ احتمال تفاهم و کاهش تنش، شاخص کل بیش از ۱۳۰ هزار واحد بالا رفت و هر ۲۱ دارایی پایهٔ حاضر در نبض بازار مثبت بسته شدن. اما خبر هنوز قطعی نیست. برای همین سراغ آپشنها میریم: آیا فقط همراه موج مثبت حرکت کردن یا موقعیت تازه هم ساخته شد؟ 🔹 ت…
❤3👍3
Signed Ali
📊 نبض پایانی بازار آپشن | ۱۲ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ بازار امروز صعود رو معامله کرد، اما ریسک رو یکطرفه نچید. امروز از ۲۱ دارایی پایه، ۲۰ نماد مثبت بودن. اختیارهای خرید (Call) هم ۷۴٪ حجم و نزدیک ۹۳٪ ارزش معاملات رو در اختیار داشتن. اگه فقط همین بخش رو ببینیم، بازار کاملاً صعودی به نظر میرسه. اما موقعیت باز (OI) تصویر کاملتری بهمون میده: OI کل بازار ۵٫۱۳ میلیون قرارداد بیشتر شد و ۵۸٪ این رشد مربوط به اختیارهای فروش (Put) بو…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Tradeops_xyz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
پرونده بعدی تریداپس درباره چی باشه؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,256,112 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تریداپس - ابزار تحلیلی اختیارمعامله” (@Tradeops_xyz), 282 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tradeops_xyz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.