Yes, and this is a report trade that was opened by an automated advisor.

Channel
TradeViAI
@TradeViAI
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
121subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003959789786 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TradeViAI |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 3 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TradeViAI |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 121 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 122 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 125 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 125 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 78.0%
- avg views ÷ 121 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 94.3
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.17%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 July 2026 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 566 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 02:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 07s
- Average length
- 2m 04s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📊 USD/CAD: Сurrent analysis We've prepared an analysis for the USD/CAD pair via tradeviai.com I'm sharing the latest situation right now—key levels, trend structure, and current signals—free for our community👑
👍2
🔄Guys, please update the Expert Advisor on the website to the new version. A bug was found that was causing incorrect calculations using the AutoLot function for metals and commodities. It's now fixed. 👁🗨I'd also like to draw your attention to the screenshot above. This is a review from one usera. By studying these reviews, we come up with new ideas. For example, you might write that something is missing, or you ha…
🔄Update EA to version 3.0 on the website TradeViAI.com ! Some changes and fixes have been made. Previous versions will not work.
⚠️You also need to update the advisor to the new version on the TradeViAI.com website.
🛠Maintenance work completed: 📊 New statistics in TradeViAI: How the system works: When you launch an analysis, the AI evaluates the trade on a confidence scale from 50% to 100% (50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100). The higher the percentage, the more confident the AI is in the signal. Also, if you set the autolot option in the EA settings, you will receive trades based on the confidence scale: from 50 to 70% on the confide…
🛠Dear users, the TradeViAI.com is under maintenance.
TradeViAI pinned «❓TradeViAI What is it? A service for complete asset analysis using AI. It's not just a "neural network response" You receive the collective decision of a team of agents. They scan the news, debate with each other, look for setups, and produce a ready-made…»
📢 Colleagues, who are already using @TradeViAIbot in your work, Share your experiences! 📝How is trading with the bot going? What results are you seeing? Are there any nuances worth knowing? It would be greatly appreciated if you could take the time to drop us a line—your experience is valuable to the community. 🚀 For those who want to try it but are unsure: If you're ready to test the bot but don't fully understand…
👋Hello everyone! This is my first trade⤴️, opened completely manually but using @TradeViAIbot analysis. I'll continue sharing my results from this account. 👌I'll use this account to trade using my knowledge in trading, opening trades manually but guided by analysis TradeViAI !!! 📊I'll also create a separate account where I'll test automated trading with using an EA TradeViAI, and I'll share my results here as well. …
👍2
And here's the full report provided by the AI. You can also study it and draw your own conclusions.
Oh, I forgot to mention, as you might have noticed, the video is sped up. The real-time report is generated with the deep research option, and it's about 30 minutes long. You can see the actual time and duration of the analysis process in the video.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TradeViAI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 209,148 of 1,601,189entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TradeViAI” (@TradeViAI), 121 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TradeViAI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.