Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Toxic Ancap

Channel

Toxic Ancap

@ToxicAncap

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

175subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001147223127
TypeChannel
Username@ToxicAncap
Created19 November 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ToxicAncap

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

172175173.57 August 2026 — 172 subscribers8 August 2026 — 172 subscribers31 August 2026 — 174 subscribers8 September 2026 — 173 subscribers15 September 2026 — 175 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 40 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 172–175 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 23:36175+2
8 Sept 2026, 16:18173-1
31 Aug 2026, 01:25174+2
8 Aug 2026, 14:46172no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:45172first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 16 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3468.0%
👍1632.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC47 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @gnapinfoPhoto

А ви кажете, немає справедливості. За десятки вбитих мобілізованих, за тисячі знищених солдат у м'ясних штурмах - з чувака зняли премію. Ну і ще півроку він не зможе отримати черговий орден. І це при тому, що цей м'ясник навіть на посаді залишиться.

🔥2

27 Jul 2026, 09:40 UTC101 viewsread 8 August 2026

Закінчується епоха https://www.storj.io/blog/storj-announces-voluntary-financial-restructuring-to-resolve-legacy-liabilities-and-position-the-business-for-growth

26 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC84 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @gnapinfoPhoto

Вагнер: українська версія. Повернеться із ЗСУ і далі дітей вбиватиме.

🔥1

22 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC113 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @gnapinfoPhoto

Пішов прогрів. Як крали - то без вас, а як «відновлювати» - то за ваш рахунок.

🔥4

18 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC150 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/portugaliya_lissabon/3344 Що тут дивного? Взяли у тимчасове користування. І винюхали.... Що ж воно, стоїть-то...

👍3🔥1

16 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC116 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Єбать, раби... Вони *зараз* знають як *можна* коли *хазяїн* показав. Коли їм десять років до цього ( в т.ч. зародку майбутньої Д7) розповідали як варто і задавали сократівські питання (щоб це було їх власне рішення, а не імплантоване зовні), то то було не воно. Треба було хазяйського хуя в дупі щоб з'явився моральний стрижень! Себто, його втрата. Хуя. В дупі. Єбать, Боже, пали це нахуй... https://t.me/gudymen…

🔥4

15 Jul 2026, 23:08 UTC87 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @gnapinfoPhoto

«Остаточне вирішення українського питання»

🔥6

15 Jul 2026, 11:16 UTC101 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Цей ранок приніс чудові новини: державна судова система (яка, як ми знаємо страж законності і права) вимагає у компанії одночасно дві протилежні речі. https://t.me/forklog/49018 Ну і новина про цензуру на вимогу найкращих представників народу https://t.me/forklog/49016 вам теж в поміч

👍1

8 Jul 2026, 08:43 UTC122 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/960588/openai-government-5-percent-stake-trump Ото що ви знаєте за проституцію!? 😊

7 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC117 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/dgt10011/status/2031757205888762205 Для тих, кому многабукафф, - скопіюйте текст в свій улюблений штінт-агент і попросіть тези. І попитайте що робити з вашим життям враховуючі ці спостереження. Візит поліції думок буде вам бонусом.

7 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC112 viewsread 8 August 2026

Демократія має бути керованою! https://t.me/forklog/48924

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ToxicAncap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Toxic Ancap” (@ToxicAncap), 175 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ToxicAncap.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.