Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Totalmateria.com

Channel

Totalmateria.com

@Totalmateria

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

265subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001005998074
TypeChannel
Username@Totalmateria
Descriptionکانال رسمی شرکت هاتف تک نیکنام نماینده Totalmateria.com آدرس: تهران ، صادقیه، برج گلدیس طبقه 12 واحد ۱۲۰۴ تلفن 02144289046 [email protected] [email protected] 👇 تماس با ادمین 👇 👉👉👉👉@aminhtn1👈👈👈👈
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Totalmateria

Growth

2655 Aug 2026, 21:36 — 265 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 00:32 — 265 subscribers5 Aug 2026, 21:367 Aug 2026, 00:32
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 264–266 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 00:32265no change
5 Aug 2026, 21:36265first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 265 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (3 February 20261 August 2026)
Views total112
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
196
Videos
118
Links
60

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTCviews —

Totalmateria.com pinned «در پروژه شما، مهم‌ترین معیار برای انتخاب نهایی متریال چیست؟»

1 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC36 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

در پروژه شما، مهم‌ترین معیار برای انتخاب نهایی متریال چیست؟

  1. انطباق با استاندارد (Compliance)30%
  2. عملکرد فنی (Performance)50%
  3. هزینه (Cost)20%
  4. دسترس‌پذیری و تأمین (Availability)20%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC35 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

اگر سه متریال همگی الزامات پروژه را تأمین کنند، انتخاب شما کدام است؟ در بسیاری از پروژه‌ها، بیش از یک متریال می‌تواند از نظر فنی قابل قبول باشد. اما انتخاب نهایی معمولاً به عوامل دیگری بستگی دارد: ▪️ هزینه ▪️ استحکام ▪️ مقاومت به خوردگی ▪️ دسترس‌پذیری ▪️ الزامات استاندارد ▪️ قابلیت تأمین در آینده به همین دلیل، انتخاب متریال فقط یک جست‌وجوی ساده نیست؛ بلکه یک تصمیم چندمعیاره است. ابزارهایی مانند Total Materia Opt

29 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC41 viewsread 7 August 2026

از همه دوستانی که در نظرسنجی شرکت کردند سپاسگزاریم. جالب بود که بیشتر شرکت‌کنندگان «الزامات استاندارد و کد» را مهم‌ترین عامل در بررسی Material Equivalency دانستند. در بسیاری از پروژه‌های صنعتی نیز اختلاف بین تأمین‌کننده، بازرس و کارفرما دقیقاً از همین نقطه آغاز می‌شود؛ جایی که متریال ممکن است مطابق یک استاندارد باشد، اما هنوز با الزامات پروژه منطبق نباشد. در پست بعدی، یک Case Study واقعی از همین موضوع منتشر خواهیم کر

12 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC71 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

اگر تأمین‌کننده ادعا کند متریال "Equivalent" است، اولین اقدام شما چیست؟

  1. بررسی Project Specification29%
  2. بررسی الزامات استاندارد و کد64%
  3. بررسی شرایط سرویس0%
  4. درخواست مستندات بیشتر از تأمین‌کننده14%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC65 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴 تأمین‌کننده می‌گوید: "این متریال معادل است." MTC ارائه شده است. ترکیب شیمیایی تقریباً مشابه است. خواص مکانیکی مطابق حداقل استاندارد است. قیمت هم پایین‌تر است. آیا همین اطلاعات برای تأیید متریال کافی است؟ در پروژه‌های نفت، گاز و پتروشیمی، یک تصمیم اشتباه در انتخاب یا جایگزینی متریال می‌تواند هزینه‌ای بسیار بیشتر از اختلاف قیمت خرید ایجاد کند. به همین دلیل، مهندسان و بازرسان فنی معمولاً علاوه بر MTC، مواردی م

30 Jun 2026, 13:52 UTC95 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

اگر فقط MTC در اختیار شما باشد، قبل از تأیید متریال اولین موردی که بررسی می‌کنید چیست؟

  1. مطابقت با Project Specification60%
  2. شرایط تحویل (Delivery Condition)10%
  3. خواص مکانیکی و آزمون‌ها30%
  4. محدودیت‌های کد و استاندارد0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jun 2026, 10:33 UTC84 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔎 آیا گواهی آنالیز کارخانه (MTC) برای تأیید یک متریال کافی است؟ در بسیاری از پروژه‌های نفت، گاز و پتروشیمی، اولین مدرکی که بررسی می‌شود MTC است. اما آیا فقط با تکیه بر این گواهی می‌توان درباره پذیرش یا رد یک متریال تصمیم گرفت؟ در عمل، مهندسین و بازرسان فنی معمولاً موارد دیگری را نیز بررسی می‌کنند؛ از جمله: ▪️ انطباق با Project Specification ▪️ شرایط تحویل (Delivery Condition) ▪️ الزامات استاندارد و کدهای طراحی

23 Jun 2026, 08:13 UTC89 viewsread 7 August 2026

📊 نتیجه نظرسنجی در پاسخ به سؤال «بزرگ‌ترین ریسک در Material Substitution چیست؟» بیشترین رأی به گزینه «تفاوت خواص مکانیکی» اختصاص یافت. اما نکته جالب اینجاست که در بسیاری از پروژه‌ها، خواص مکانیکی تنها بخشی از ماجرا هستند. تفاوت در شرایط عملیات حرارتی، الزامات استاندارد، شرایط سرویس و حتی ریزساختار ماده می‌تواند باعث شود دو متریال که روی کاغذ مشابه به نظر می‌رسند، در عمل عملکرد کاملاً متفاوتی داشته باشند. به همین

21 Jun 2026, 11:53 UTC82 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

بزرگ‌ترین ریسک در Material Substitution چیست؟

  1. تفاوت خواص مکانیکی50%
  2. تفاوت عملیات حرارتی19%
  3. عدم تطابق با استاندارد/Spec25%
  4. عدم تأیید مشتری13%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Jun 2026, 11:51 UTC69 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

آیا همه جایگزینی‌های مواد قابل قبول هستند؟ در بسیاری از پروژه‌ها، تصمیم‌گیری درباره Material Substitution فقط به مقایسه ترکیب شیمیایی محدود نمی‌شود .خواص مکانیکی، عملیات حرارتی، شرایط سرویس، الزامات استاندارد، شرایط جوشکاری و تأیید مشتری همگی می‌توانند در نتیجه نهایی مؤثر باشند .به نظر شما در پروژه‌های واقعی، کدام عامل بیشترین ریسک را در Material Substitution ایجاد می‌کند؟

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Totalmateria. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

در پروژه شما، مهم‌ترین معیار برای انتخاب نهایی متریال چیست؟

  1. انطباق با استاندارد (Compliance)30%
  2. عملکرد فنی (Performance)50%
  3. هزینه (Cost)20%
  4. دسترس‌پذیری و تأمین (Availability)20%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

اگر تأمین‌کننده ادعا کند متریال "Equivalent" است، اولین اقدام شما چیست؟

  1. بررسی Project Specification29%
  2. بررسی الزامات استاندارد و کد64%
  3. بررسی شرایط سرویس0%
  4. درخواست مستندات بیشتر از تأمین‌کننده14%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Jun 2026, 13:52 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

اگر فقط MTC در اختیار شما باشد، قبل از تأیید متریال اولین موردی که بررسی می‌کنید چیست؟

  1. مطابقت با Project Specification60%
  2. شرایط تحویل (Delivery Condition)10%
  3. خواص مکانیکی و آزمون‌ها30%
  4. محدودیت‌های کد و استاندارد0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Jun 2026, 11:53 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

بزرگ‌ترین ریسک در Material Substitution چیست؟

  1. تفاوت خواص مکانیکی50%
  2. تفاوت عملیات حرارتی19%
  3. عدم تطابق با استاندارد/Spec25%
  4. عدم تأیید مشتری13%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Jun 2026, 12:08 UTCAnonymous Poll27 voters

اگر تأمین‌کننده به جای AISI 4140، گرید 42CrMo4 پیشنهاد دهد، چه می‌کنید؟

  1. تأیید می‌کنم11%
  2. ابتدا خواص و استانداردها را بررسی می‌کنم56%
  3. بدون تأیید مشتری قبول نمی‌کنم33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Totalmateria.com” (@Totalmateria), 265 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Totalmateria.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.