🔶زبان گیاهان ✅ تربت جام آنلاین تلگرام: 🆔 https://t.me/Torbatjam_Online روبیکا: 🆔 https://rubika.ir/TorbatjaamOnline
❤3

Channel
@Torbatjam_Online
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
79,497subscribers
-49 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001067087523 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Torbatjam_Online |
| Description | ✅بزرگترین کانال تفریحی - خبری مردمی حوزه تربت جام و منطقه 🔸آخرین اخبار مهم ،محلی ،اجتماعی ،استخدامی 💵سفارش تبلیغات: @Tj_online2 🎤ارسال خبر و سوژه: @TJ_Online1 @Ad_Online ⭕️اینستاگرام: https://www.instagram.com/torbatjam.online |
| Created | 31 May 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Torbatjam_Online |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 79,497 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 79,499 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 79,497 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:27 | 79,504 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 79,506 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 79,509 | -23 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 79,532 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 79,528 | -20 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 79,548 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 79,546 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 79,546 | first reading |
383 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 383 (5 August 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,502,674 |
| Reactions total | 11,871 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 110 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11,367 reactions across 363 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,429 | 39.0% | |
| 👎 | 3,677 | 32.3% | |
| 👍 | 1,808 | 15.9% | |
| 💔 | 1,453 | 12.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 383 of the 383 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,871reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 383 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔶زبان گیاهان ✅ تربت جام آنلاین تلگرام: 🆔 https://t.me/Torbatjam_Online روبیکا: 🆔 https://rubika.ir/TorbatjaamOnline
❤3
🏴 إِنَّا لِلَّهِ وَإِنَّا إِلَيْهِ رَاجِعُونَ با نهایت تأسف و تأثر، درگذشت مرحومه فاطمه عثمانی را به اطلاع دوستان، آشنایان و بستگان محترم میرسانیم. 🕊 مراسم تشییع پیکر آن مرحومه امروز، یک شنبه ۲۵ مرداد ساعت ۱۷:۱۵ در بهشت محمدیه برگزار میگردد حضور شما عزیزان در این مراسم، باعث شادی روح آن مرحومه و تسلی خاطر بازماندگان خواهد شد. ✅ تربت جام آنلاین تلگرام: 🆔 https://t.me/Torbatjam_Online روبیکا: 🆔 https://rubika.ir/T…
💔21❤7👎2
بعد از این که بانک مرکزی کارمزدهای ساتنا و پایا رو نجومی بالا برد حالا دیگه داره از آب هم کره میگیره آخرین کارشون برای درآمدزایی این بوده که روی برداشت پول از عابربانک ها هم کارمزد گذاشتن! ✅ تربت جام آنلاين 🆔 @Torbatjam_online
💔37👎21❤9
🔸داورزن با دمای ۴۱.۲ درجه گرمترین و فریمان با ۱۵.۸ درجه خنکترین نقاط استان در ۲۴ ساعت گذشته هستند ✅ تربت جام آنلاين 🆔 @Torbatjam_online
❤11👎1
با یه ضربه چپ کرد🤣🤣 ✅ تربت جام آنلاين 🆔 @Torbatjam_online
❤8
سلام به خاطرات گوریل انگوری ✅ تربت جام آنلاين 🆔 @Torbatjam_online
❤21
امروز 16 August، روزِ (True Love Forever) عشق واقعی برای همیشهست. +تو این روز باید به تنها عشق زندگیت، کسی که با تمام وجود عاشقشی و عشقش قراره تا آخرین روز زندگیت توی قلبت بمونه، این روز رو تبریک بگی❤️ ✅ تربت جام آنلاين 🆔 @Torbatjam_online
❤16💔2👎1
🔹کارمزد ساتنا و پایا افزایش یافت 🔹جدیدترین نرخ کارمزدهای بانکی نشان میدهد کف کارمزد پایا با رشد ۳۳ درصدی به ۴۰۰ تومان و سقف آن با افزایش ۶۰ درصدی به ۱۲ هزار تومان رسیده است. 🔹سقف کارمزد ساتنا نیز ۵۰ هزار تومان شده و کارمزد کارتبهکارت تا یک میلیون تومان ۱۱۰۰ تومان و به ازای هر یک میلیون تومان بیشتر، ۳۵۰ تومان افزایش مییابد. ✅ تربت جام آنلاين 🆔 @Torbatjam_online
👎17❤2
درخواست عضو کمیسیون عمران مجلس: حقوق کارکنان برای نیمه دوم سال افزایش پیدا کند 🔹افزایش حقوق پرسنل با وجود اینکه در بودجه مصوب شده بود، دولت به طور کامل عمل نکرده و ۲۰ درصد افزایش داده است. 🔹در حوزه معیشت و کنترل بازار، اقدامات عملیاتی ضروری است و دولت باید با جدیت بیشتری وارد عمل شود./ایسنا ✅ تربت جام آنلاين 🆔 @Torbatjam_online
❤13
امیدبهزندگی در ایران به ۸۰ سال رسید معاون بهداشت وزارت بهداشت: 🔹️ امیدبهزندگی کشور به ۸۰ سال رسیده درحالیکه سال ۱۳۵۷، ۵۵ سال بوده است./فارس ✅ تربت جام آنلاين 🆔 @Torbatjam_online
👎92❤6💔6
مهلت ثبتنام آزمون ارشد علوم پزشکی تمدید شد ثبتنام آزمون کارشناسی ارشد علوم پزشکی سال ۱۴۰۵ که قرار بود روز گذشته شنبه ۲۴ مرداد به پایان برسد، از سوی مرکز سنجش آموزش پزشکی تا ساعت ۱۰ صبح روز ۲۸ مرداد تمدید شد. ✅ تربت جام آنلاين 🆔 @Torbatjam_online
❤4
🔺️🔻آسیب به ۴۴ کارخانه دارویی در ایام جنگ رئیس سازمان غذا و دارو: 🔹️ارز دارو فقط به دارو تخصیص مییابد و بانک مرکزی، سازمان غذا و دارو و سایر نهادها نمیتوانند ارز را از این مسیر منحرف کنند. 🔹️سهم سلامت از تولید ناخالص داخلی در کشورهای پیشرفته بالای ۱۰ درصد و در کشور ما تقریباً ۴ درصد است. 🔹️امروز دسترسی مردم به هوش مصنوعی ارتقا یافته و افراد با داروهای جدیدی که در جهان مطرح و معرفی میشود آشنا میشوند اما ما باید بر…
❤3💔3👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 383 posts we hold for @Torbatjam_Online. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Torbatjam_Online edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 44,801 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تربت جام آنلاین” (@Torbatjam_Online), 79,497 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Torbatjam_Online.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.