$BOB - 15x 🤝 , I'm expecting a 100x very soon. https://t.me/ExplainThisBob
🔥25❤17👏3👍1

Channel
@TopG_CALLS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
303subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001641220168 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TopG_CALLS |
| Description | Journey to 8 figs Only TOP G calls NFA / DYOR For inquiries contact: @AndrewTateOG |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 25 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TopG_CALLS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 303 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:39 | 303 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
556 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 321 | 57.7% | |
| 👍 | 95 | 17.1% | |
| ❤ | 81 | 14.6% | |
| 🌚 | 23 | 4.14% | |
| 🤩 | 14 | 2.52% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 2.16% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 0.899% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.54% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 556reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2023 to 27 April 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$BOB - 15x 🤝 , I'm expecting a 100x very soon. https://t.me/ExplainThisBob
🔥25❤17👏3👍1
https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xbe8bc29765e11894f803906ee1055a344fdf2511 Bought this. Looks interesting $BOB ~700k mc
🔥25👍4❤2
Bought this $70k mc Pepe's best friend Saw some of my fellow $PEPE holders buying this so i decided to join them. https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xdb9df6fdb2c525992b5908ed8ea542782162940a TG: t.me/LandWolfErc20
🔥18❤11
$TRUTH now at 2.6Mil, 10m next 🔥 TG: https://t.me/TruthGPTPortal
🔥28👍4
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x3606a7c5db88a6c9046ea63409250cf79e07671a Heard it's alpha 👀 $HODL
👍16🔥5🤩3
aped this 460k mc https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xc1d93Fd8AaF76b17781bFdd5A1CB09ca5Ce72c13 Send it G's
🔥15👍7
Gambled here around 190k mc looks sendy https://t.me/bebecoineth https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xa07db25cd4635b353d0c7ecaa77b86bcd5bb915c
🔥16❤6👍2🤩1
This is starting to move 360k 📈
🔥16👍3
https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x827f0b4db4865cf0719c0c01dae6412ed16f9380 Pepe killer , this could run , dip 80k marketcap. Tg: https://t.me/thepepekiller
🔥12❤4👏2
Bought this dip @ 180k $TROLL https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x2bc39c41d4e1e8b7287c5516fc19bb5c33884990 TG: https://t.me/trollfaceportal
🔥18👍8
TopG CALLS / @AndrewTateOG pinned a GIF
The beast inside you has awoken. It's time to rise up and show the world what you're capable of. You have the power within you to achieve greatness, to conquer any obstacle in your path. Don't hold back, don't be afraid. Let the beast within drive you forward, push you to new heights. Believe in yourself and your abilities. You are strong, you are fierce, you are unstoppable. The journey ahead may be difficult, but w…
❤33🔥7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TopG_CALLS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@TopG_CALLS named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TopG CALLS / @AndrewTateOG” (@TopG_CALLS), 303 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TopG_CALLS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.