Channel
@TongTonglol
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
115subscribers
+97 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004447009509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @TongTonglol @yangshizi0 |
| Created | 25 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TongTonglol |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 10:22 | 115 | +14 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 101 | +40 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:26 | 61 | +41 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 20 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 18 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 18 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 25 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (25 August 2026 – 7 October 2026) |
| Views total | 620 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Oct 2026, 10:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
【验证留名】：BB 【验证时间】：10月7日 【老师艺名】：桐桐 【所在位置】：龙首原 【颜值描述】：9分 【身材描述】：不错，约160左右，比较瘦 【皮肤描述】：很滑，透亮那种，年轻就是好 【区器描述】：b 【服务过程】：看到上新约了头课，一进门，有女友感，主打年轻漂亮，人很热情，可甜可御。很健谈，不会有冷场感。服务没问题，手法比较专业，之前干过纯正规，毕竟18的身体谁不爱呢。上面两点粉嫩，啄的时候都不敢用力，怕吸破了。挺拔，非常白，很柔软。 浑身香喷喷的。主要是腰很细，纤细如柳，让人爱不释手。 【优点缺点】：优点就是年轻，服务很棒，毕竟男人永远喜欢18岁。 【推荐评分】：10分
进门看到桐桐老师，眼前也是一亮，漂亮😻小小一只，老师先放好水，帮我精细冲洗，细微擦拭，然后体验跪式服务，确实很有特色，妹妹很主动，手法相当专业，很久也是没有好好体验过服务了，也挺会说话，服务很好，很热情， 会主动迎上来，最后愉快出 【优点缺点】：很好，基本无缺点
今天开课啦😘😘😘
桐桐 19岁身高160 体重90 🐻B A 套餐：轻松释放（359/60 分） 舒缓放松 + 猫爬鼻息 + 窃窃私语 + 胸砂 + 坐根 + 玉足挑逗 + 手足无限 B 套餐：半裸制服（459/70 分） 玉体半裸 + 欲火缠身 +玉指漫游+猫爬鼻吸+耳边私语+玉体缠身+丝足挑逗（包含 A 套餐） 桐桐：@TongTongOL 双向： @tongtongnmbot 频道 ： @TongTonglol
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel name was changed to «桐桐的频道»
看来我不如上面老哥，没舌吻 但是有亲嘴。 刚上岗的嫩妹就是好，服务态度也好，胸揉起来挺软挺爽的，嘬起来也不错。身材好，18岁正是青春年华，皮肤好，性格偏。年龄挺小还喜欢搞掌控哈哈
刚出来 美包包😂 服务很棒 按摩到位 纯纯的嫩妹 颜值和照片一样 身材很棒 皮肤也白 可以舌吻 下面毛还剃了 美炸了！！！ 强烈推荐！！！
Video, posted without a caption
洋柿子 18岁 身高168 体重98斤 🐻b 人照一致 私影转丝足 A套餐：半裸丝足（429/70分限一次） 全身放松+半裸释放+玉指漫游+猫爬鼻吸+耳边私语+玉体缠身+丝足挑逗 B套餐: 全裸丝足(520/70分钟限两次) 全身放松+全裸丝足+玉指漫游+猫爬鼻吸+耳边私语+玉体缠身+丝足挑逗 电报： @Yangshizi00 双向： @YANGSHIZIII_bot 频道： @yangshizi0
Channel name was changed to «洋柿子🍅的频道»
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @TongTonglol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“桐桐的频道” (@TongTonglol), 115 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TongTonglol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.