Channel
@Ton_latamm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
350subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002158116270 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ton_latamm |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ton_latamm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 350 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 353 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 353 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
28 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍾 | 10 | 35.7% | |
| 😱 | 10 | 35.7% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 25.0% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2025 to 11 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️ ÚLTIMA HORA: Coleccionista pierde $800K en estafa de USDT falso Un importante coleccionista chino ha sido estafado con +888 8 321, un número de Telegram que vale más de $800,000. El estafador de alguna manera logró enviar una oferta de intercambio con USDT falso en GetGems, a pesar de que la plataforma supuestamente solo acepta tokens verificados. EVITEN USAR GETGEMS HASTA QUE ESTO SE RESUELVA!!!
🤯3
🚀 La cadena de bloques TON acaba de actualizarse y ahora es 10 veces más rápida. ⚡️ La tasa de bloques aumentó en 6 veces. ⏱️ Las transacciones ahora son instantáneas, en menos de un segundo. 🪙 Este fue el paso 1 de 7 para Hacer que TON vuelva a ser grande (MTONGA). Próximo paso: reducir las ya bajas tarifas de transacción en 6 veces. ✂️
🍾2
🚀 The TON blockchain just got upgraded and is now 10× faster. ⚡️ Block rate increased 6×. ⏱ Transactions are now instant, subsecond. 🪙 This was step 1 of 7 to Make TON Great Again (MTONGA). Next step: cut the already low transaction fees by 6×. ✂️
el fomo vuelve a los nfts en ton?
🎁Top Telegram NFT Sales | First Week of January 🥇 Anonymous Number +888 8 080 sold for 192,900 ($366,369) 🥈 Anonymous Number +888 8 123 sold for 135 000 TON ($250 383) 🥉Plush Pepe #826 sold for 54 147 TON ($102 735) > Plush Pepe #1707 sold for 45 000 TON ($85 380) > Plush Pepe #1205 sold for 31 000 TON ($58 877) > Plush Pepe #1384 sold for 19 500 TON ($37 035) 💃Great start for Telegram and TON NFTs in 2026! Do yo…
Check out this Christmas game on Telegram 🎄 If you join, we both get gifts! Then you can decide if you wanna keep playing or not :) Here’s the link 👇👇👇
Temporada EVAA XP Termina en 24 horas ⏱😇 Esta es tu última oportunidad para asegurar la asignación de tokens $EVAA de la manera más fácil posible. FARM XP 👈 Temporada de minería $EVAA comienza justo después. Mantente atento a los anuncios ⛏ App | Soporte | X | Guías | Ref | SDK
LA ESPERA HA TERMINADO 😇\n\n El $EVAA TGE está oficialmente programado para el 03.10.2025. \n\nHas visto los números. Has visto el respaldo. Ahora es momento de poseer el núcleo de la revolución DeFi de TON 🤑\n\n⌨️ SITIO WEB TGE ⌨️\n\n$EVAA es la base del protocolo de préstamos #1 de TON, ya confiado con depósitos ATH de más de $118M, 300K+ billeteras y un volumen de más de $1.4B.\n\n Tener $EVAA te da ventajas direc…
🤯1
Como van tus colecciones de stickers favorita? Bien🍾 Mal 🤡
🍾3🤡1
🔴🏦🇺🇸 Las probabilidades de un recorte de tasas de interés se disparan tras las débiles señales del mercado laboral. Ahora se esperan tres recortes de 25bp de aquí a diciembre en cada reunión. ➡️ La probabilidad de un recorte más agresivo de 50bp, prácticamente inexistente antes del NFP, aumentó a alrededor del 38% en las reuniones de septiembre-diciembre tras los datos más débiles. Esto refleja que el mercado ahora …
🤯1
FUD?
😱2
Despues de esto los stickers de dogs volaron 🚀
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Ton_latamm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TON LATAM💎” (@Ton_latamm), 350 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ton_latamm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.