Symptom Formation in To Be-Analysis
❤8

Channel
@ToBe_Analysis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
345subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003913871781 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ToBe_Analysis |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 27 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ToBe_Analysis |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 345 | +15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 330 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 327 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 327 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,148 |
| Reactions total | 239 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
239 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 151 | 63.2% | |
| 👏 | 52 | 21.8% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 8.79% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 4.60% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.837% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.418% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.418% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Symptom Formation in To Be-Analysis
❤8
سیمپتوم بهعنوان پدیده زروانی ما معمولاً سیمپتوم را پدیدهای آسیبزا میشناسیم که با درد، رنج و اختلال در زندگی فرد همراه است. کسی که گرفتار وسواس، اضطراب، فوبیا یا یک رفتار تکرارشونده است، معمولاً میخواهد هرچه زودتر از آن رهایی یابد. از این رو، سیمپتوم در نگاه نخست چیزی به نظر میرسد که باید حذف شود. اما آیا ممکن است همین پدیده دردناک، در سطحی عمیقتر، وظیفهای محافظتی نیز بر عهده داشته باشد؟ آیا ممکن است سیمپتوم،…
❤9👍1
واژهنامهٔ مقدماتی هستیکاوی برای دنبالکردن مطالب این کانال، بهتر است از همین ابتدا با برخی از مفاهیم اصلی هستیکاوی آشنا شویم. تعریفهای زیر کوتاه و مقدماتیاند و همزمان با گسترش نظریه تکمیل خواهند شد. این واژه نامه به طور ثابت در کانال پین می شود تا در هر زمان امکان دسترسی شما به آن فراهم باشد. ۱ـ هستیکاوی | To Be-Analysis: چارچوبی روانکاوانه برای مطالعهٔ نسبت میان هستی، زمان، ابژه، تروما و رنج روانی. پرسش اص…
👏5❤3👍1
An Introductory Glossary of To Be-Analysis To follow the discussions in this channel, it may be helpful to become familiar from the outset with some of the central concepts of To Be-Analysis. The following definitions are brief and preliminary and will be expanded as the theory continues to develop. 1- To Be-Analysis: A psychoanalytic framework for studying the relationships among being, time, objects, trauma, and …
❤5
What Is a Zurvan Phenomenon? From the cup of tea we drink in the morning to the work we choose, from loving and creating art to scrolling aimlessly through social media, nearly everything we do is also a way of passing time. In To Be-Analysis, I call the diverse actions through which we use different objects to pass time “Zurvan Phenomena.” Through these phenomena, the ego employs Zurvan Objects to move out of presen…
❤2
#پدیده_زروانی چیست؟ در هستیکاوی، ما با یک حقیقت بسیار ساده اما تکاندهنده روبرو هستیم. ما انسانها موجوداتی هستیم که درون ظرفی به نام زمان پرتاب شدهایم و از لحظه وقوع ترومای تولد تا پایان زندگی، بزرگترین و اساسیترین دغدغه ما این است که این زمانِ کشدار و بیوقفه را چگونه سپری کنیم. وقتی از این زاویه به زندگی نگاه میکنیم، میبینیم که تکتک کارهایی که در طول روز انجام میدهیم، در واقع تلاشهایی هستند برای گذراندن …
❤2👏2👌1👍1
ببینید این هنرمند با چه حوصله ای این کار سخت و طاقت فرسا را انجام می دهد. او اگر چه خسته می شود و انرژی و زمان زیادی را صرف این کار می کند اما همه ما می دانیم که از هنرش لذت هم می برد. اگر از زاویه هستی کاوانه به این کار نگاه کنیم او با کمک این کار می تواند زمان بی نهایت و غیرقابل تحمل را در ظرفی قابل تحمل تر بریزد. او با این کار گذشته از هر چیز دارد زمان را می گذراند. هنر خلاق را پدیده زروانی کایروسی می نامیم. در ای…
❤9👍4
The Difference Between the Now and the Present The “now” may be understood as a momentary, point-like cut that has no duration or succession of its own. By contrast, the present is a living and extended interval-whether in terms of objective time or ontological time-within which experience unfolds. This unfolding is the condition that makes the formation of the past and the future-or the future past -possible. Theref…
❤4👏1
تفاوت اکنون و زمان حال اکنون را مي توان به منزله يک برش لحظه اي و نقطه اي فهميد که خود آن امتداد و توالي ندارد. در مقابل، زمان حال يک بازه زنده و امتداددار (چه از نظر زمان ابژکتیو و چه از نظر زمان هستی شناسانه) است که تجربه در آن جريان پيدا مي کند و همين جريان يافتن، شرط امکان شکل گيري گذشته و آينده (یا گذشته در آینده) است. بنابراين وقتي گفته مي شود زمان حال مقدم بر گذشته است، منظور آن است که گذشته تنها بر بستر زمان…
❤5👏4👍3
خبرنامهٔ انگلیسیزبان To Be-Analysis در لینکدین آغاز به کار کرد. در نخستین شماره با عنوان «Introducing To Be-Analysis: Being, Time, and the Burden of Being»، دربارهٔ پرسشهایی نوشتهام که در طول بیش از پانزده سال مرا بهتدریج به سوی شکلدادن هستیکاوی هدایت کردند: انسان چگونه زمان را تجربه و تحمل میکند؟ ابژهها چگونه به او در تحمل بار هستی یاری میرسانند؟ و نخستین تجربههای ما از هستی، زمان، جدایی و تروما چگونه شکل …
👏5❤4👍2
پیکرهٔ شیرسر میترایی در موزههای واتیکان؛ تصویری که غالباً به زروان، خدای زمان بیکرانه، نسبت داده میشود، هرچند هویت دقیق آن همچنان محل اختلاف است. The lion-headed Mithraic statue in the Vatican Museums-an image often associated with Zurvan, the god of Infinite Time, although its precise identity remains a matter of scholarly debate. https://t.me/ToBe_Analysis
❤5👍3🙏1
Why “Zurvan Object”? I chose the name “Zurvan Object” because I wanted the structure’s relationship with “time” and myth to be present in the name itself, although in my earlier writings I used the term “Transitional Time Object.” I borrowed this name from the myth of the god Zurvan, who, in the Zurvanite branch of the Zoroastrian tradition, is the personification of “Infinite Time” and the primordial principle of cr…
❤3👏2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ToBe_Analysis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 153,914 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“To Be-Analysis” (@ToBe_Analysis), 345 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ToBe_Analysis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.