Channel
@TipstersCheck
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
505subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001648954830 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TipstersCheck |
| Description | Creando un TripAdvisor sobre tipsters. Un proyecto que busca aportar transparencia a la comunidad de apuestas. 📱App móvil: onelink.to/tipsterscheck Dime sobre qué tipsters quieres comentar y leer en la app: @TipstersCheck_INFO |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 28 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TipstersCheck |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 505 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 505 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 506 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 28 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
109 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 46 | 42.2% | |
| 🎉 | 33 | 30.3% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 7.34% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 5.50% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 4.59% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 4.59% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.75% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 1.83% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.917% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2023 to 24 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hola hola y hola! 👋 Han pasado algunos meses desde la última vez que envié una actualización por aquí. (En @TipstersCheckBets sí hemos seguido activos) No me enrollo: necesitaba un respiro respecto al proyecto y me lo he dado. Esta semana me pondré al día con todo y todos (contestaré las conversaciones pendientes, añadiré a la plataforma el perfil de los tipsters que me habéis solicitado, contaré las novedades por…
🎉12❤2👏1
¡90 participantes! 😍 Enhorabuena a los 10 ganadores, escribidme por privado t.me/TipstersCheck_INFO Gracias a todos los que habéis participado con vuestras recomendaciones y quienes contribuís al crecimiento del proyecto 🫶
🎉7👍4👌2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
Vamos con el resto de premios: 🎮 10 ganadores de la membresía a la comunidad privada de TipstersCheck en Discord:
Me gusta que además de explicar de manera detallada el funcionamiento del servicio del tipster, resalta aquellos aspectos importantes para él y por los cuales está recomendando el tipster. Una reseña muy elaborada y bien argumentada, ¡enhorabuena! 👏
💯5❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍6👌1
Ganador de la suscripción al servicio privado de Andreas Kloft en Julio: 🏅 El premio a la recomendación más elaborada y mejor argumentada es para el usuario "ropp nik" (te he enviado email, o háblame si lo estás leyendo aquí) con esta reseña sobre el tipster TradingChevaux 👇🏽
👍1
Vamos con el sorteo que anunciamos hace 2 semanas para celebrar que alcanzamos las 🌟1000 reseñas en la app.
Acabo de realizar el sorteo, ahora comparto los ganadores y vídeo-prueba. Dadme 4 minutos
🎉3
Hola, hoy a las 19h de 🇪🇸 procederé a realizar el sorteo entre todas las reseñas publicadas en la app desde el 11 de junio hasta la hora del sorteo 😀 Los ganadores se anunciarán en este canal.
👍6
Hemos alcanzado las 1000 reseñas sobre tipsters en la app TipstersCheck 🎉 ¡1000 gracias! 🫶 Para celebrarlo, vamos con un SUPER SORTEO 🎁 Premios (11 ganadores): 🤩🏈 1 mes de servicio Premium de Andreas Kloft en Overgreen para Julio, valorado en 75€. 🎮 10 membresías vitalicias para la comunidad privada TipstersCheck en Discord. Si resultas ganador y ya eras miembro, ganarás una suscripción de un mes al grupo Tipster…
🎉7❤2🍾1👌1👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
🏆2❤1🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TipstersCheck. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 769,558 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TipstersCheck” (@TipstersCheck), 505 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TipstersCheck.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.