Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

تِـبْࢪٌ |•

@Tibberchannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

202subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002560401388
TypeChannel
Username@Tibberchannel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Tibberchannel

Growth

2028 Aug 2026, 15:00 — 202 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 17:40 — 202 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:008 Aug 2026, 17:40
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 201–203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 17:40202no change
8 Aug 2026, 15:00202first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 202 subscribers
Avg views / post
26.9
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total537
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 38s
Average length
1m 49s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52987163916191902831458.3%
custom 5359560895494119959625.0%
custom 5821397143990047423416.7%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC12 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @el3akida27Video

⚠️ على النساء أن تُغلق الخاص. ولا تدخلي باسْمِكِ ✖️ على النساء إغلاقُ الخاص، وعدمُ الردِّ على أيِّ رجلٍ غريب. 🎙فضيلة الشيخ علي بن زيد المدخلي حفظه الله تعالى

Signed لميس أمُّ الوليد

7 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC21 viewsread 8 August 2026

ᯓ بالرحمة تُنال الرحمة، قال النبي ﷺ، وهو الصادق المصدوق: « الرَّاحِمُونَ يَرْحَمُهُمُ الرَّحْمَنُ، ارْحَمُوا مَنْ فِي الأَرْضِ يَرْحَمْكُمْ مَنْ فِي السَّمَاءِ ». والعكس بالعكس، فقد جاء في الصحيحين: « مَنْ لا يَرْحَمْ لا يُرْحَمْ ». ↲ وأولى الناس برحمتك: الأقربون منك، ثم جميع الناس، بل حتى الحيوانات؛ فإنك إن رحمتها رحمك الله. وقد ثبت في صحيح مسلم عن النبي ﷺ أنه ذكر أهل الجنة، ونصَّ منهم على رجل قال فيه: « ورجل رح

Signed خويلة بن محمود

7 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC18 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

ᯓ خطبة جمعة بعنـ↯ـوان: 『اصـبرا صـبرًا جـميلًا 』 ↜علي بن زيد المدخلي حفظه الله.

Signed خويلة بن محمود

6 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC27 viewsread 8 August 2026

ᯓ قال محمد الأمين الشنقيطي رحمه الله في قوله تعالى: ﴿وَمَا آتَاكُمُ الرَّسُولُ فَخُذُوهُ وَمَا نَهَاكُمْ عَنْهُ فَانْتَهُوا﴾. قال الشيخ رحمه الله: إن السنة كلها مندرجة تحت هذه الآية الكريمة، أي: أنها ملزمة للمسلمين العمل بالسنة النبوية، فيكون الأخذ بالسنة أخذًا بكتاب الله، ومصداق ذلك قوله تعالى: ﴿وَمَا يَنْطِقُ عَنِ الْهَوَى ۝ إِنْ هُوَ إِلَّا وَحْيٌ يُوحَى﴾ [النجم: ٣-٤]. وقد قال السيوطي: الوحي وحيان: • وحي أُمرن

Signed خويلة بن محمود

6 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026

ᯓ السُّنة عند السلف! جاء عن سعيد بن المسيب أنه قال في مجلسه بالمسجد النبوي: لعن الله في كتابه الواصلة والمستوصلة، والواشمة والمستوشمة، فقالت امرأة قائمة عنده: وفي كتاب الله؟ قال: نعم. قالت: لقد قرأته من دفته إلى دفته، فلم أجد هذا الذي قلت. فقال لها: لو كنت قرأتيه لوجدتيه، أو لم تقرئي قوله تعالى: ﴿وَمَا آتَاكُمُ الرَّسُولُ فَخُذُوهُ وَمَا نَهَاكُمْ عَنْهُ فَانْتَهُوا﴾. وقد لعن رسول الله ﷺ الواصلة والمستوصلة، ومن لعن

Signed خويلة بن محمود

6 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC26 viewsread 8 August 2026

ᯓ ثُمَّ إِنَّ عَلَيْنَا بَيَانَهُ (١٩) ﴿ثُمَّ إِنَّ عَلَيْنَا بَيَانَهُ﴾ أي: بيان معانيه، فوعده بحفظ لفظه وحفظ معانيه، وهذا أعلى ما يكون، فامتثل ﷺ لأدب ربه، فكان إذا تلا عليه جبريل القرآن بعد هذا، أنصت له، فإذا فرغ قرأه. ⤶ وفي هذه الآية أدب لأخذ العلم، أن لا يبادر المتعلم المعلم قبل أن يفرغ من المسألة التي شرع فيها، فإذا فرغ منها سأله عما أشكل عليه، وكذلك إذا كان في أول الكلام ما يوجب الرد أو الاستحسان، أن لا يبا

Signed خويلة بن محمود

6 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC29 viewsread 8 August 2026

ᯓ أعجب من منكر للسنة يأكل السمك أوليس الله عز وجل قال جل وعلا ﴿حُرِّمَتْ عَلَيْكُمُ الْمَيْتَةُ وَالدَّمُ وَلَحْمُ الْخِنزِيرِ وَمَا أُهِلَّ لِغَيْرِ اللَّهِ بِهِ﴾. من وظيفة السنة في القرءان الكريم تخصصيها لعام القرءان كما قال ﷺ: « أحلَّت لَكُم ميتتانِ ودَمانِ، فأمَّا الميتَتانِ ، فالحوتُ والجرادُ، وأمَّا الدَّمانِ، فالكبِدُ والطِّحالُ ». والحديث اخرجه ابن ماجه وصححه الألباني.

Signed خويلة بن محمود

6 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC29 viewsread 8 August 2026

ᯓ قال الألباني رحمه اللّه: جاء عن الإمام الشافعي رحمه اللّه أنه قال: "السنة كلها" - يعني بطبيعة الحال ما صح منها - "هو ممَّا أفهَمَه الله جل وعلا نبيَّه ﷺ". فالقاعدة في تفسير القرآن إنما هو بالرجوع إلى القرآن والسنة، ولا ينبغي أن نقول بالرجوع إلى القرآن ثم السنة؛ لأن هذا فيه تصريح بأنه في المرتبة الثانية، نحن لا نريد أن نتكلَّم فيما لا يليق إلا بأهل العلم فنقول: نعم السنة من حيث ورودها هي بالمنزلة الثانية بالنسبة

Signed خويلة بن محمود

6 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC30 viewsread 8 August 2026

ᯓ قال الإمامِ محمد بن إدريس الشافعي رحمه اللّٰه تعالى: « السُّنَةُ إِمّا أن تكون مقرِّرةً ومؤكَّدةً حُكْماً جاء في القرآن الكريمِ، أو مبيِّنةً وشارحةً له، أو للاستدلال بها على النَّسْخ، أو مُنْشِئَةً حُكْماً سَكَت عنه القرآنُ ».

Signed خويلة بن محمود

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Tibberchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 513,202 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تِـبْࢪٌ |•” (@Tibberchannel), 202 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tibberchannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.