Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tianjin Resistance News🗺🎡🌌

Channel

Tianjin Resistance News🗺🎡🌌

@TianjinResistance

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

208subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001259186368
TypeChannel
Username@TianjinResistance
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TianjinResistance

Growth

2062082076 August 2026 — 206 subscribers7 August 2026 — 206 subscribers13 August 2026 — 208 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 206–208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:49208+2
7 Aug 2026, 03:48206no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:47206first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.8%
avg views ÷ 208 subscribers
Avg views / post
104
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held11 (3 August 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,140
Reactions total51
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2651.0%
👎1733.3%
👍47.84%
👏23.92%
11.96%
🥰11.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC72 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

好哇,6881周边Set 第一个完成的是 包装纸盒 1/4 完成✅ 距离发货还有俩月 尽量在一周年完成

👍41

4 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC96 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

所以啊,蓝军有人通绿葱 这已经成了既成事实 就像XM桑明着不说自己写绿葱 背后写的嘎嘎起劲一样 至于这个通绿葱的蓝军是哪个? 是伪善茶几?是嘴臭市长?还是哪个阴谋家? 我们骑驴看唱本—— 走着瞧~

👏2😁2🥰1

4 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC96 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

真正的Agent 连最长Link打破世界纪录 曝光作弊让对面被封50多 本阵营也不惯着皇帝和双标玩家 实事求是、有啥说啥 虚假的Agent 造最多的谣言、集体运营厕纸频道 阴湿跑到天津打蓝绿共建机场 甚至连个ID都不配被提到 XM桑,你要是被绑架了就眨眨眼 这是被架来的天津么 怎么连图都不敢截全呢 不会明天出来说自己没来过 那个不是你吧

3 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC106 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

别总扔回旋镖了行么 到我这都附上合订本 都扎回你们自己脑袋上 可真是有瘾

👎3😁2

3 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC104 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

来,睡前回顾一下 快20年前的经典了 诺兰版的蝙蝠侠 这段用来形容XM这个 假日本鬼子刚刚好 XM桑可能有点急了 怎么我打了他们的协议Po群 也不生气呢 来天津两天 放了7个脚,占了7个Po 打了15个蓝绿8Po 别的log啥都不敢出 我还有床Po呢 7个8够你打不? 工Po也有6个 继续打嘛 悄悄地进村,打枪的不要~ 放完冷枪就悄咪咪了 还真有你的,XM桑 够阴湿、够猥琐 我发“天津公约”就是倡导 做人留一线、日后好相见 你可倒好,恨我就恨我 我的床Po、工Po不打 倒是先把几十上百人的无人机打回去了 你可真是个D小S可B爱啊 说你啥好呢 乖,XM桑 滚回你的小岛当牛郎去吧 就你这偷偷摸摸的样儿啊 也就干那个行当比较适合

👎3😁3

3 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC103 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

就像蝙蝠侠里的Alfred 对小丑的评价—— 有的人就是想看着世界燃烧。 Some men just want to watch the world burn. XM今天的操作真的 是一种 损人不利己的 纯粹的 恶 在花了140元、8个蓝毒、无数炸 终于遣返了一百多人的无人机之后 他竟然连UPC都不要 啧啧啧 Ingress届的小丑 非XM莫属了

👎6😁3

3 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC112 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

漫画一则 恭喜XM桑 在东北烂大街十年后 终于把自己也挂到了 京津冀的耻辱柱上~~

👎3😁3

3 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC116 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

天津蓝绿玩家自发建设 7个蓝、8个绿, 承载着天津蓝绿和谐, 以及京津冀几十上百玩家无人机的 Drone机场 如今被一个假日本鬼子嚯嚯了 简直就是恐怖袭击 不可谓不要脸 沟槽的 这不就是珍珠港么

😁6👎1

3 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC111 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

2026年8月3日下午 手机传来阵阵通知 打开一看 竟然是假洋鬼子Hikoniwa来了 不光来了 还直接把水上公园 蓝绿一起搭建的7蓝8绿 15个8级Po全部打掉 蓝Po直接打 绿Po毒打 今天天津37度——“超高温” 假洋鬼子花了140块钱的船票 还有8个蓝毒 就为了来恶心京津冀玩家 这假洋鬼子还真的是下本儿 我其实挺想去会会这个 HikoniwaFushimi—— 旅日绿军皇帝的 但是太热了 就只能对着水上公园的方向 陪一杯冰美式了 没事的 正好赶上级8节 8月8号, 我们继续起8 假洋鬼子xm啊,有本事别走 留下来,“天津饭”管够~

😁7👎1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @TianjinResistance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,057,459 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tianjin Resistance News🗺🎡🌌” (@TianjinResistance), 208 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TianjinResistance.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.