All done! Always a pleasure, Runesya-ssi, Mark-ssi, Heyla-ssi, and Esther-ssi. We appreciate you guys oh-so much and we hope you love that. He-he. Enjoy your incredible Monday to the fullest. 🤍

Channel
Wordsmith’s Magnolious Querencia: Endeared Thy–Palimpsest!
@Thysest
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
36subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001610119911 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Thysest |
| Description | Ꮠ.. @ThysestBot 〔WRĪTERE: IV〕Writer of the fēower seasons, being amalgamated with the authority of seasonal masterpiece—euphonious cadence and paean. Rhythmic bound matron with a godsend hailed knowledge, @ThyPalimpsest | @TisThysest. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 7 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Thysest |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 36 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 36 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 7 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 9
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 7s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
30 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 73.3% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 16.7% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2023 to 9 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
〔 @iRoseanne 〕 as Athena Grant-Nash! 🚓—🚒 From “9-1-1” TV Series. The LAPD field Seargent can be counted on to be at the centre of most cases. Athena is blunt, devoted, tough, and able to think outside of the box. She is very accomplished and professional. She sees things as black and white; Either it is right, or it is wrong. She never gives in to the job, and she is described as working too hard for her good. In h…
❤5✍2🕊1
〔 @XiaotingShen 〕 as Henrietta Wilson! 🚓—🚒 From “9-1-1” TV Series. The LAFD firefighter paramedic keeps saving lives in near-miraculous ways. Additionally, her resume is quite large as she has tried her hand at different careers before, including serving as a lifeguard and a sales representative. Hen is shown as caring, kind, and loyal. She has a big heart and is always ready to make sacrifices for others. Her cool…
✍1❤1🕊1
〔 @Markl 〕 as Edmundo Diaz! 🚓—🚒 From “9-1-1” TV Series. The firefighter previously served as an Army Medic stationed in Afghanistan. On the job, Eddie is portrayed as resourceful, dependable, and able to think quickly on his feet, which he has attributed to his experience operating ‘While getting shot at’ in Afghanistan. He is a private person who generally does not share his problems with his co-workers for fear o…
❤1
〔 @njxun 〕 as Howard Han! 🚓—🚒 From “9-1-1” TV Series. The firefighter paramedic enjoys his job but his father disapproves of it. Consequently, the two are estranged. Han is ever cheerful and always cares about the welfare of his colleagues. On many occasions, he has put their needs above his own. Howard is shown as playful, loyal, and devoted. He never goes back on a promise, and always wants to do what is right. H…
❤1🕊1
Wordsmith’s Magnolious Querencia: Endeared Thy–Palimpsest! pinned «📝 Salutations, precious Lezers! We hold dear to grant you something highly special. You may drop your username ID (@) below to get an outstanding gift from us! ♥ 👤 @iRoseanne, thank you. 👤 @xiaotingshen, thank youu 👤 @Markl thank you 👤 @njxun thankyou!…»
📝 Salutations, precious Lezers! We hold dear to grant you something highly special. You may drop your username ID (@) below to get an outstanding gift from us! ♥ 👤 @iRoseanne, thank you. 👤 @xiaotingshen, thank youu 👤 @Markl thank you 👤 @njxun thankyou! 👥 4 people have voted so far. 📖 Anonymous Board 🚫 This poll is closed...
Sticker, posted without a caption
Let's celebrate Ziyoung-nim's festive jubilation, Lezers!
❤3
https://t.me/thebeafrau/2772
ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ “𖤝..𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐚 𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐚𝐧𝐲𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐬𝐰𝐚 𝐜𝐡𝐫𝐲𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦𝐮𝐦 𝐭𝐞𝐚 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐞𝐨𝐮𝐬-𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐧.” 𓍢🕊𖡻 Ofteonw‘th heaven færinga-sugar, her adorable andwlita is admired by others, whose presence is manifested as‘a light that radiates incessantly, exuding the hnesce charm gecynd. and allure and grace o‘a noblewoman who was bl
Let’s join them, Lezers! <3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Thysest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,134,929 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Thysest named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 3 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 3 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wordsmith’s Magnolious Querencia: Endeared Thy–Palimpsest!” (@Thysest), 36 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Thysest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.