Channel
@ThorS_Info
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
182subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001253364898 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ThorS_Info |
| Created | 24 November 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ThorS_Info |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 182 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 181 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 181 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 August 2025 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 423 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
77 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 48 | 62.3% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 9.09% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 9.09% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 6.49% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 5.19% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 3.90% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 Digitale Kontrolle im Eiltempo: Gesetz für deutsche EUDI-Wallet vorgelegt! 🇩🇪🇪🇺Das Thema digitale Identität nimmt in Deutschland eine gefährliche Dynamik an. Die Bundesregierung hat am 3. August 2026 den Entwurf für das neue "Digitale Identitätengesetz" vorgelegt, um den rechtlichen Rahmen für die europäische digitale Brieftasche (EUDI-Wallet) zu schaffen. Der offizielle Start ist bereits für Januar 2027 geplant.…
😱1
Und noch etwas kündigt sich an... Passend dazu bereite ich gerade etwas vor, das mir schon lange am Herzen liegt: eine kleine Reihe, in der ich euch Wissenschaft so erkläre, dass sie wirklich jede und jeder verstehen kann – ohne Studium, ohne Formeln, die abschrecken. Wissenschaft zum Anfassen, bei der ihr nicht nur zuschaut, sondern selbst mitmacht und experimentiert. Los geht es im August. Den Anfang macht das woh…
❤9
🕊 Es ist offiziell – und ich freue mich riesig Ende letzter Woche kam die Bestätigung von der Behörde: Unser CIRAS Institute ist als Verein in Wien eingetragen! Das offizielle Entstehungsdatum ist der 30. Juni 2026. Für mich persönlich ein riesiger Moment – nach Monaten der Vorbereitung dürfen wir jetzt als eigenständiges wissenschaftliches Institut loslegen. Und wisst ihr was? Der 30. Juni hat es in sich. Schaut e…
❤7🙏1
https://t.me/+TGV0vm_eqKH8VcHI
📊 Wie siehst du das Thema „Digitale ID“ ab 2027?
The shares total 189%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🚨 Digitale ID ab 2027: Geniale Erleichterung oder der Freifahrtschein ins Social-Credit-System? Beim Thema Digitalisierung in Deutschland scheiden sich ja oft die Geister. Ab Anfang 2027 soll bei uns schrittweise die neue digitale ID eingeführt werden – die sogenannte EUDI-Wallet. Damit können wir unseren Personalausweis, Führerschein und andere Dokumente direkt auf dem Smartphone speichern. Vom Prinzip her klingt …
🌱 Können Pflanzen Gedanken lesen? Das Geheimnis von Cleve Backster 🤔 In den 1960er Jahren schloss der US-Verhörspezialist Cleve Backster eine Zimmerpflanze an einen Lügendetektor an. Als er nur daran dachte, ein Blatt anzuzünden, schlug das Gerät wild aus! Später erkannte die Pflanze sogar den „Mörder“ einer Nachbarpflanze wieder. Backster war überzeugt: Pflanzen haben Gefühle, Angst und ein Gedächtnis. 🤯 🔬 Das Dil…
❤2💯1🙏1
Dieses Jahr hat mich bis an meine innersten Grenzen geführt – und darüber hinaus. Dorthin, wo nichts mehr sicher war und alles Alte gehen musste. Es war schmerzhaft, manchmal leise, manchmal brutal ehrlich. Doch es war notwendig. Was zerbrochen ist, durfte zerbrechen. Was nicht mehr zu mir gehörte, ist gegangen. Mein altes Ich hat losgelassen. Ein neues hat begonnen zu atmen – mit einer anderen Klarheit, einer ander…
❤19🔥3😁1🙏1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7🙏2
https://m.bild.de/politik/inland/hausdurchsuchung-bei-welt-kolumnist-21-monate-nach-dem-tweet-klopfte-die-polizei-68fa43b3c00d9a7eefc70cff?t_ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
Während es früher nur uns investigative Journalisten von den alternativen Medien getroffen hat, haben mittlerweile auch Kollegen des Mainstreams in diesem Land mit Konsequenzen seitens des Staates zu tun. Im Gegensatz zu uns wurde allerdings nicht in den Medien über solche Sanktionen und Razzien berichtet oder wenn wurden wir als die "Bösen" öffentlich an den Pranger hingestellt. Ich kann mich beispielsweise noch gu…
👍3
Dies passiert wenn Politik und Bürger einen Volksentscheid nicht ernstnehmen. Dann gewinnen Aktivisten mit ihren extremen Ansichten. Hamburg wird jetzt quasi "abgewrackt". Dies ist nicht nur für die Hamburger Bevölkerung und Industrie der absolute "Supergau", sondern wird wenn alles gemäß dem Bürgerentdcheid umgesetzt wird, für ganz Deutschland massive Folgen haben. Es zeigt einmal mehr wie "verdummt" die Menschen …
💯2💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ThorS_Info. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📊 Wie siehst du das Thema „Digitale ID“ ab 2027?
The shares total 189%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 325,906 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ThorS Info öffentlich” (@ThorS_Info), 182 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ThorS_Info.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.