12 Nov 2021, 21:28 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @GeorgePapadopoulos
Federal court delivers a major ruling https://conservativebrief.com/appeals-54364/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=539 @GeorgePapadopoulos
Channel
Tom Woods
@ThomasEWoods
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001570397313 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ThomasEWoods |
| Created | 19 August 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ThomasEWoods |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 42 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 42 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 19 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 November 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 56s
- Average length
- 1m 56s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
5 Nov 2021, 22:41 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo
Here's what you need to know: stop being a tool
5 Nov 2021, 22:25 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo
And this is how you know for a fact the claim is false
28 Sept 2021, 19:53 UTC813 viewsread 11 August 2026
Just read a @LeonardPittsJr1 column saying (literally) "good riddance" to people who quit their jobs over vaccine mandates. They're stupid and unscientific -- why, all this could have been over were it not for them! Hey, Mr. Science Man: the vaccines don't stop transmission.
28 Sept 2021, 19:53 UTC765 viewsread 11 August 2026
Actual self-described libertarians are seriously suggesting that AOC is the best member of Congress and much better than @RepThomasMassie. So I smashed this, even though it shouldn't have been necessary
28 Sept 2021, 19:52 UTC716 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @RepThomasMassieVideo
The is the most articulate, sensitive and poised explanation of natural immunity, self ownership, medical freedom, and loving your neighbor that I have seen to this day, and he accomplishes it in under 2 minutes. @RepThomasMassie If US public health officials and elected leaders were this forthright about natural immunity they would garner far more trust from the people they serve. @JJudahIsaac @CDCgov @POTUS @Spea…
12 Sept 2021, 21:24 UTCviews —
Tom Woods pinned «After all the lies, the laughable "science," the stupid plexiglass barriers, the worry that maybe an unmasked three-year-old playing soccer is going to kill you -- I want to invite you to a massive celebration for normal https://tomwoods2000.com/»
12 Sept 2021, 21:24 UTC618 viewsread 11 August 2026
After all the lies, the laughable "science," the stupid plexiglass barriers, the worry that maybe an unmasked three-year-old playing soccer is going to kill you -- I want to invite you to a massive celebration for normal https://tomwoods2000.com/
20 Aug 2021, 20:10 UTC552 viewsread 11 August 2026
🇺🇸
19 Aug 2021, 20:59 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @ThomasEWoods. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,084,668 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tom Woods” (@ThomasEWoods), 42 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ThomasEWoods.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.