Не знала, что первый том Аутсайдеров тоже яой, как третий — Это adventures of the outsiders глава 36 #ЛжеЩП
🌚13🥴4❤🔥2👾1💅1😭1custom 52156074988362922741custom 53347926093720521401

Channel
@ThefalseDormouse
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
308subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002463164418 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ThefalseDormouse |
| Description | Прозаик среднего звена, художник видов из окна 💥 Донаты: 2202206862123317 Анонимка: http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=4zjzo Щитпост: https://t.me/+qh1rTo2Awk9jOTky Мой профиль в ТТ: @thefalsedormouse |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ThefalseDormouse |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 308 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 308 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (31 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,731 |
| Reactions total | 298 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
298 reactions across 13 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙏 | 46 | 15.4% | |
| 🤝 | 40 | 13.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 35 | 11.7% | |
| custom 5215607498836292274 | 19 | 6.38% | |
| 💘 | 19 | 6.38% | |
| 😭 | 17 | 5.70% | |
| 👾 | 15 | 5.03% | |
| 🌚 | 14 | 4.70% | |
| custom 5201675363662461362 | 13 | 4.36% | |
| custom 5208926136041483966 | 11 | 3.69% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 3.69% | |
| 💅 | 10 | 3.36% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 3.36% | |
| custom 5334792609372052140 | 9 | 3.02% | |
| 💋 | 6 | 2.01% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 1.68% | |
| 🥴 | 5 | 1.68% | |
| custom 6325713200318777460 | 3 | 1.01% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 1.01% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 1.01% | |
| 3 further kinds | 4 | 1.34% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 298reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Не знала, что первый том Аутсайдеров тоже яой, как третий — Это adventures of the outsiders глава 36 #ЛжеЩП
🌚13🥴4❤🔥2👾1💅1😭1custom 52156074988362922741custom 53347926093720521401
Перерыв на смешное, пока я делаю не смешное — Виктор, я почти готов поцеловать тебя — Эй, бэт-бой, прикрой свои ноги, а-то кто-нибудь может начать задавать вопросы Мои любимые The new BL Titans — The New Teen Titans глава 23 #ЛжеЩП
❤🔥6💋5custom 52156074988362922742🌚1👾1💅1💘1🔥1
Вы знаете, что я практически никогда не участвовала в конфликтах, и вообще не люблю это всё, но сегодняшний инцидент вывел меня из себя настолько, что я не буду два года молчать, как в случае с моей несуществующей травлей. Как думаете, публиковать пост прямо здесь или в подслушано? Предупреждаю, если вы полезете туда, будьте готовы к ретравматизации от множества упоминаний сексуального насилия #ЛжеЩП
custom 520167536366246136213🙏6❤🔥2custom 53347926093720521402👾1💅1💔1😭1
Рандомная мысль #31: я в таком ахуе с когнитивных искажений людей, которые оправдывают Слэйда. Каждый такой срач можно использовать, как основу для дипломной работы по моей специальности... #ЛжеЩП
🤝16custom 63257132003187774603❤🔥1👾1💋1💯1🙏1custom 53347926093720521401
Если бы вы знали, как сильно я его ненавижу... Готовлю маленький пост для щитпоста, потому что весь думаю об арке Тары и суде над этим существом — Tales of the Teen Titans глава 54 (теперь добавляю источники, раз вы хотите) #ЛжеКомиксы
😭13💘4👾2🤝2❤🔥1custom 52470076396651294261custom 53347926093720521401
И просто хочу уточнить: нездоровые отношения ≠ насилие и абьюз. Я написала всё в очень общих чертах, потому что пост и так огромный, но надо понимать, что это спектр, а не бинарная система, где отношения либо идеальные, либо абьюзивные #ЛжеЩП
🙏8🤝4💅2❤🔥1👾1💘1
Организационный вопрос. Вам бы хотелось, чтобы я указывала название комикса и главу, когда публикую какие-то панельки оттуда? #ЛжеЩП
custom 521560749883629227412💯3❤🔥2🍾2👾1💅1💘1custom 52089261360414839661
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Здравствуйте, вы же психолог и тем более с красным дипломом! Так что хотелось бы узнать именно с психологической точки зрения возможно ли такое что человеку нравятся абьюзивные токсичные пейринги и он осознает что они токсичные и при этом он абсолютно ментально здоров? Или только если у тебя возможные ментальные проблемы то тебе нравятся абьюзивные пейринги? Просто я сам не разбир…
❤🔥8🔥4🙏3🤝2✍1👾1💅1custom 52089261360414839661
Ко мне сейчас в бане подошла крошечная девочка (годика три) и сказала, что потеряла маму. "А где мама?" 🐱 Мы нашли маму... #ЛжеЩП
🙏11custom 52089261360414839665🎉3🍾1👾1💅1
Рандомная мысль #30: Когда мне попадаются очень кринжовые ларп тиктоки по DC, и я вижу, что это репостнул кто-то из тех, на кого я взаимно подписана, я боюсь увидеть там своих друзей... Было? #ЛжеЩП
🤝12custom 53347926093720521404💯2👾1💅1💘1😭1🙏1
Они заставляют меня плакать #ЛжеКомиксы
🥰10💘6❤🔥3👾2💅1😭1🙏1custom 52156074988362922741
Честно говоря, мне очень сложно с ДикКори... Сейчас постараюсь объяснить некоторые эмоционально сложные для меня штуки, так что, пожалуйста, прочитайте внимательно, полностью и тд (( Я люблю их вместе и по отдельности. Они оба очень талантливо написанные персонажи. Так же, как и их отношения. Наверное, ситуация с ними для меня близка к ситуации с Хэлом. Я просто приведу как пример, а потом объясню, как это относится…
❤🔥9🙏5🤝3👾1💘1custom 52089261360414839661
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ThefalseDormouse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 181,672 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“тгк: лжесоня” (@ThefalseDormouse), 308 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ThefalseDormouse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.