Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

медиа есть сообщение

@The_medium_is_the_message

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

122subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002085831562
TypeChannel
Username@The_medium_is_the_message
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/The_medium_is_the_message

Growth

12210 Aug 2026, 02:02 — 122 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 03:51 — 122 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 02:0210 Aug 2026, 03:51
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 121–123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 03:51122no change
10 Aug 2026, 02:02122first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 13 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1222.6%
🔥1222.6%
917.0%
👏713.2%
👻35.66%
😁35.66%
🤔35.66%
😢23.77%
🍌11.89%
💅11.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 14 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 11 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @The_medium_is_the_message. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 April 2026 to 14 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Jun 2026, 14:04 UTC90 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @uparta

Про работу на портфолио с большими богатыми клиентами Людям нравится выпендриваться всякой ерундой. Бизнес - не исключение. Чистая прибыль - сложная задача, поэтому гораздо проще, как вариант, набрать себе в клиенты крупных известных компаний или людей, а затем повесить их логотипы на сайт, и рассказывать про работу с великими и могущественными на конференциях. Чтобы все, включая самого владельца, думали, что если т

👍2

14 Jun 2026, 14:04 UTC68 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Иногда почитываю Журбу. Сегодня в одном посте он объяснил все, что нужно знать про работу с большими брендами «для кейса». Всем словам верить. Проверено неоднократно. Красивый логотип в разделе «с кем мы работаем» не равен деньгам на счете. Единственная допустимая работа «для кейса» — это кейс, где вы получили прибыль. Если это крупный банк, ИТ-компания, мероприятие, ведомство — замечтательно. Но это может быть и

1

31 May 2026, 11:18 UTC92 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ai_nomPhoto

Риски ИИ превосходят угрозу ядерного оружия Это заявление не членов Qanon, а военных и представителей международных организаций на одном из ключевых азиатских форумов по безопасности Shangri-La Dialogue в Сингапуре. Начальник обороны Нидерландов Онно Эйхелсхейм заявил: ИИ — это огромный риск с точки зрения эскалации. Но я не наивен. Его будут использовать. Его уже используют. ⬛️Параллельно с этим — заявление от с

👍3👻32🍌1💅1

31 May 2026, 11:18 UTC77 views6 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

Интересно, как в будущем назовут события 2020-х годов. Сингапурский кризис? Многополярный? При самом негативном исходе предлагаю назвать: You've hit your usage limit.

3👏3

16 May 2026, 20:59 UTC127 views6 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

Чтобы проверить почту — не нужно знать как работает TCP/IP. Чтобы подключиться к серверу — не нужно понимать как устроены транзисторы. Чтобы сделать таблицу с формулами и условиями — не нужно знать как данные хранятся. Просто заполняешь ячейки и получаешь результат. Это классическая концепция из компьютер сайнс — уровни абстракции. Каждый новый уровень скрывает сложность предыдущего. В конце пятидесятых появился

👍3😁3

1 May 2026, 21:51 UTC243 views5 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

State of Brand опубликовали данные которые пиарщики ждали (боялись) двадцать лет. 85% упоминаний брендов в AI-выдаче приходит со сторонних сайтов. Не с вашего лендинга, не с вашей продуктовой страницы. С того что о вас написали другие — журналисты, блогеры, аналитики, отраслевые издания. Это значит одно: PR получил метрику. Не «охват», не «тональность упоминаний», не «индекс цитируемости» который никто не умел о

🤔3👍2

24 Apr 2026, 15:42 UTC132 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Сейчас активно продвигается тезис: мол, в эпоху ИИ выиграют люди ручного труда. Благородный нарратив, где справедливость восторжествовала. Звучит красиво, но есть нюанс. Основные заказчики этого самого ручного труда — и были условные айтишники, маркетологи, менеджеры и прочие воротнички. Те, кто и были потребителями ремонта, сборки, доставки, клининга, мастеров домой и прочего бытового сервиса. Если этих людей увол

👏43

21 Apr 2026, 11:34 UTC329 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Считаю «Очень сказочные дела» недостаточной полумерой и бесплатно предлагаю Газпром-медиа несколько идей, чтобы наконец-то занять топ-250 Кинопоиска нормальным кино.

🔥5

14 Apr 2026, 15:23 UTC136 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Любопытно, как сервисы адаптируются к новым потребностям. Вот тут Resend при создании API сразу предлагает функцию Copy for AI — чтобы юные (и не очень) вайб-кодеры не тратили свои ценные токены на то, чтобы разобраться, что с этим всем делать и как жить. Хозяйке (вендорам) на заметку.

👍2

13 Apr 2026, 11:25 UTC128 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Когда-то у мобильников был стиль

🔥7😢2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @The_medium_is_the_message. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,062,067 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“медиа есть сообщение” (@The_medium_is_the_message), 122 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/The_medium_is_the_message.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.