Channel
@The_Kliushin_Insight
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
761subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002093919700 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @The_Kliushin_Insight |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/The_Kliushin_Insight |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 761 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 767 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:49 | 766 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 766 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (27 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,142 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
☕️ Но если честно: Чрезмерный оптимизм — это очень правильный жизненный подход для человека стремящегося. Лучше быть постоянным оптимистом и идеалистом, чем «реалистом» или «пессимистом». • Пессимизм вреден (без комментариев) • Реализм полезен, но ограничивает пространство для маневрирования, так как урезает вашу фантазию в вопросах о возможном развитии будущего. Воображение важнее чем интеллект. (так сказал Эйнш…
Мы с вами наблюдаем явление под названием: «Прогрев»💪
Ох уж этот Илон Маск – отчет SpaceX за 2 квартал 2026 Первый в истории полноценный корпоративный отчет от SpaceX. Начну с самого интересного – рубрика «сказки Маска на ночь»: · «Более 1 млн т на орбиту в год, в конечном счёте 10 млн т» – при фактических 2100 тонн в год, что предполагает рост выхода на орбиту в 480-5000 раз, т.е. чистая фантастика. · «Через год мы будем делать минимум один полёт St…
Отчет SpaceX за 2 квартал 2026 (начало здесь) Connectivity – единственный сегмент, генерирующий прибыль. Он же частично финансирует убытки двух других. Отношение CapEx / Revenue выросло до 235% в 2кв26 vs 228% в 1П26, 111% в 2025, 80% в 2024 и 43% в 2023. Все уходит в ИИ – 83% от всех капитальных расходов. В ИИ 90% ёмкости идёт внешним клиентам, включая прямых конкурентов Grok. Названы два клиента: Google и Anth…
Кто намерен работать в импортозамещенном Starlink, можете попробовать такое свежее направление образования 🤯
Инженерное образование от БЮРО 1440 Создание спутниковой связи нового поколения требует компетенций десятков инженерных специальностей. Вместе с ведущими техническими вузами страны БЮРО 1440 запускает профильные образовательные программы, которые дают студентам теорию и практику для старта карьеры в нашей команде. За два года мы запустили 12 таких программ по всей стране — от Москвы до Новосибирска. В 2026 году про…
Накатал 300 часов в Victoria 3 за Романовых Ощущается как курс лекций по политэкономии 1836-1936 Назовите мне более проработанный симулятор планеты земля в стиле Grand Strategy. Полагаю что у вас не получится, детализация симуляции тут на запредельном уровне. Жду 4ю версию с продвинутыми ИИ-агентами. Кто готов зарубиться онлайн, я принимаю вызов @ne_cyberslav
Кстати, кому я не сообщил: Я не успел податься на сентябрь 2026 в Китайский университет из-за проблем с загранпаспортом и учебной визой. Буду подаваться в SUSTech Shenzhen на сентябрь 2027.
Вот красиво, на нормальной платформе для написания статей
Очень плохо работает новая фишка для написания TG-статьи. Даже абзац нельзя нормально перенести... Отвратительно...
Posted without readable text
Overbafer пилит импортозамещение Palantir. Поддерживаю!
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @The_Kliushin_Insight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 808,776 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Kliushin Insight” (@The_Kliushin_Insight), 761 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/The_Kliushin_Insight.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.